Analysis · Question Period question · beta

Yves-François Blanchet

Bloc Québécois on Indigenous Affairs 2026-11-05

83 words · 4 sentences · 5 clauses

Statement grade

A+

Average 100 / 100

A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.

Claims 87%The question 13%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Claims · 72 wordsthe chief of the Assembly of First Nations, Cindy Woodhouse Nepinak, has criticized Bill C-39, saying that it violates the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.¹ We are hearing the same thing from the Native Women’s Association of Canada, ²which has also expressed concerns about the environmental impacts of the bill and the potential repercussions for women.³ Except for the government members, no one really agrees with Bill C-39. The question · 11 wordsWill the Prime Minister also tell indigenous peoples to keep quiet?

At a glance

Nothing lost points.

Choose a measurement above to see how it scored.

Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.

What the tags mean

Signal · 100

Nothing lost points on Signal.

Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.

Relevance · no score

Not applicable: nothing to answer. Excluded from the average.

Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue.

Respect · 100

Nothing lost points on Respect.

Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.

Clarity · 100

Nothing lost points on Clarity.

Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.

Claims · 3

This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.

1“the chief of the Assembly of First Nations, Cindy Woodhouse Nepinak, has criticized Bill C-39, saying that it violates the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples”Assembly of First Nations National Chief Cindy Woodhouse Nepinak has criticized Bill C-39, saying it violates the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.search
2“the Native Women’s Association of Canada”The Native Women’s Association of Canada has made the same criticism, that Bill C-39 violates the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.search
3“expressed concerns about the environmental impacts of the bill and the potential repercussions for women”The Native Women’s Association of Canada has expressed concerns about the environmental impacts of Bill C-39 and its potential repercussions for women.search

Analysed on 2026-11-06