Analysis · Question Period answer · beta

Caroline Desrochers

Liberal on The Budget 2026-11-06

84 words · 4 sentences · 6 clauses

Replying to Yves Perron (Bloc Québécois)

“Mr. Speaker, Quebec had two demands with respect to this budget: health care and the reimbursement of nearly $700 million owed to Quebec for welcoming asylum seekers, because we are the ones looking after them. The federal government has been dragging its feet on this debt to Quebec since 2024, when Quebec was taking in a disproportionate share of asylum seekers, without the federal government providing any assistance or ensuring fair distribution. As the saying goes, a debt paid is a friend kept. On this issue, however, the federal government has not been treating Quebec like a friend. Why do the Liberals have money for everything except repaying their debts to Quebeckers?”

Statement grade

C+

66 / 100, held down by Relevance

A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.

Claims 73%Promise 27%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Claims · 61 wordsas my colleague is well aware, we made historic investments in health care in the 2025 budget.¹ We are continuing to do so in the 2026 budget, for example with a $2-billion program that will invest in mental health infrastructure and in tackling addiction, ²and with a new $5-million fund that will support projects that integrate social services, health and housing.³ Promise · 23 wordsWe are committed to this.Partly on pointVague promise We are going to end homelessness, Vague promiseand we will do so in partnership with the provinces and municipalities.Off point

At a glance

Lost points for
Didn't answerNone of this answer addressed the specific question that was asked.

Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.

What the tags mean

Signal · 100

0 of 8 deductions are Signal

Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.

Nothing lost points.

Relevance · 36

6 of 8 deductions are Relevance

Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the question asked.

Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about.What the tags mean “as my colleague is well aware, we made historic investments in health care in the 2025 budget.”About past health investments, not the repayment owed to Quebec that was asked about.
Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about.What the tags mean “We are continuing to do so in the 2026 budget, for example with a $2-billion program that will invest in mental health infrastructure and in tackling addiction,”About health funding programs, not the debt to Quebec raised in the question.
Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about.What the tags mean “and with a new $5-million fund that will support projects that integrate social services, health and housing.”About a new social services and housing fund, not the asylum seeker reimbursement asked about.
Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about.What the tags mean “We are committed to this.”A general commitment to health spending, not a response on the debt to Quebec.
Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate.What the tags mean “We are going to end homelessness,”About ending homelessness, a different subject from the debt repayment asked about.
Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate.What the tags mean “and we will do so in partnership with the provinces and municipalities.”About partnership with provinces and municipalities on homelessness, not the question asked.

Respect · 100

0 of 8 deductions are Respect

Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.

Nothing lost points.

Clarity · 83

2 of 8 deductions are Clarity

Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.

A promise with no date, no measure and no one responsible.What the tags mean “We are committed to this”A commitment with no actor, measure, date or success condition beyond the prior claims.
A promise with no date, no measure and no one responsible.What the tags mean “We are going to end homelessness”A sweeping goal with no date, measure or success condition named.

Claims · 3

This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.

1“we made historic investments in health care in the 2025 budget”The 2025 federal budget included investments in health care.search
2“a $2-billion program that will invest in mental health infrastructure and in tackling addiction”The 2026 federal budget includes a $2-billion program investing in mental health infrastructure and tackling addiction.search
3“a new $5-million fund that will support projects that integrate social services, health and housing”The 2026 federal budget creates a new $5-million fund supporting projects that integrate social services, health and housing.search

Analysed on 2026-11-07