Industry

During Question Period, Gabriel Ste-Marie of the Bloc Québécois asked about the government’s decision to end the Canadian consumer protection initiative, a fund that supported research into living costs and competition. He argued the roughly $7 million in savings was trivial compared to what the government spends elsewhere, including on oil companies, and said cutting it would leave no one examining grocery prices, phone contracts, or airline fees. Industry Minister Mélanie Joly replied that the government will present a new vision for competition in Canada, intends to work with consumer protection organizations on funding, and noted that consumer protection is largely a provincial and territorial responsibility. She added that the government wants consumers informed of their rights and is working to increase competition in the grocery and telecommunications sectors.Written by AI from the debate. Updated .

Official text (opens in a new tab)

2 statements

Gabriel Ste-Marie, Joliette—Manawan

Bloc Québécois
“The government is cutting seven million dollars for research that helps protect consumers from high living costs. It still gives billions to oil companies. I want to know why the minister protects big business instead of Canadians.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, the Liberals announced on Thursday that they were eliminating the Canadian consumer protection initiative. That is a fund that supported research into things like the cost of living and competition. It would have gotten $7 million between 2025 and 2027. That is peanuts to a government that is handing out tens of billions of dollars to oil companies. However, losing that funding reduces our organizations’ ability to work. When it comes to consumer protection, why is the minister standing up for big business instead of Canadians?

Gabriel Ste-Marie, Joliette—Manawan

Bloc Québécois
“The government is cutting consumer protection programs to save a tiny amount of money. This helps big companies instead of people, because no one will investigate grocery prices, phone contracts, or airline fees. I want the minister to explain why.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I hope that is the case, because eliminating the Canadian consumer protection initiative will have no impact on public finances. It is a drop in the bucket. Then again, eliminating it is quite a gift for large corporations that cut corners. The Liberals are preventing consumer protection agencies from investigating things like shrinkflation in grocery stores, contracts in the telecommunications and banking sectors, airline pricing practices, and the list goes on. They are literally helping large companies protect themselves from consumers who are well informed about their rights. How can the minister justify that?

Discussion

No comments yet

See the full discussion

Comment rules

More from sitting 126

  1. Private Members' Business Offender Rehabilitation Act 7 statements
  2. Government Orders Budget 2025 Implementation Act, No. 2 39 statements
  3. Government Orders Budget 2025 Implementation Act, No. 2 16 statements
  4. Oral Questions The Economy 12 statements
  5. Oral Questions The Environment 6 statements
  6. Oral Questions The Economy 14 statements
  7. Oral Questions Industry 4 statements
  8. Oral Questions The Economy 10 statements
  9. Oral Questions Canadian Identity and Culture 2 statements
  10. Oral Questions The Economy 18 statements
  11. Oral Questions Indigenous Affairs 3 statements
  12. Oral Questions The Environment 2 statements
  13. Oral Questions Foreign Affairs 2 statements
  14. Oral Questions Justice 6 statements
  15. Oral Questions The Economy 2 statements
  16. Government Orders Budget 2025 Implementation Act, No. 2 89 statements
  17. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 3 statements
  18. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 3 statements