Adjournment Proceedings

In an adjournment debate, Conservative MP Jacob Mantle raised a question he had asked the Minister of Agriculture about tax rules that make it costly for farmers to pass their land to the next generation, asking whether the government would fix these rules in the fall. Liberal MP Ryan Turnbull replied that farm succession is a real challenge, pointed to a recent bill making the capital gains tax exemption permanent for sales of businesses to employee ownership trusts or worker co-operatives, and said the government is open to exploring how that model could help farmers. Mantle also used his remaining time to say he disagreed with the Speaker’s ruling from the previous day, arguing it had given the government an unfair procedural advantage in proposing changes to a bill. Turnbull also said the government had cut taxes and offered support for jobs, apprentices and first-time homebuyers, and criticized the Conservatives for voting against that cost-lowering bill.Written by AI from the debate. Updated .

Official text (opens in a new tab)

2 statements

Ryan Turnbull, Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Finance and National Revenue and to the Secretary of State (Canada Revenue Agency and Financial Institutions)

Liberal
“Farmers struggle to pass their farms to the next generation. Our recent bill helps owners sell businesses to their workers without paying capital gains tax. This model could help farmers too, and the government is open to exploring that.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, it is good to be here in the very last moments before the House rises for the summer. I know that there are a large number of farms in the member opposite’s riding. There are farm succession plans all across this country, and farmers do struggle with succession, so I understand the issue the member is speaking about. We have done some things recently, in the spring economic update implementation act, on this front with capital gains exemption. It applies only to employee ownership trusts and worker co-operatives, but I think it highlights where the government is open to looking at options for succession to make it easier to hand down businesses. In this case, the one I am referencing is employee ownership trusts, which is a model I have advocated for. Worker-owned co-operatives will get the same tax treatment. It is a measure I have supported from day one because it offers owners of businesses that are small- to medium-sized, or they could be larger, the opportunity, when they want to sell the business, to protect those businesses and also to hand them down to workers. This creates wealth-building opportunities for frontline workers in a grocery chain, for example. There are many examples in the U.K. For example, Waitrose is a company run by John Lewis Partnership. It is a good example of how employee ownership trusts can create a shared equity model where frontline workers get to participate in the proceeds of the company. I think it is similar to a model that could be applied to farms in this country, although I do not know of any workup of the details on that at this point. I thank the member for bringing this up. I think it is an important consideration.

Ryan Turnbull, Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Finance and National Revenue and to the Secretary of State (Canada Revenue Agency and Financial Institutions)

Liberal
“The Conservatives say they care about struggling Canadians, but they use people's hard times for political gain. We cut taxes and offered help for jobs, apprentices, and first-time homebuyers. If the Conservatives really want tax cuts, they should not have just voted against our bill that lowers costs for people.”
  • Reply to a comment in debate

    Relevance 0 of 100

    None of this statement addressed the specific topic under debate.

    See full analysis
  • A repeated line

    “We have suspended the excise tax on fuel.”

    Said 3 times by 2 members since May 6.

    Every time it was said
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I would just say that it has become apparent in the House, through question period and many of the proceedings, that the Conservatives claim that they are about protecting and supporting vulnerable people, but in fact, they just seem to use those people’s hardship for political gain. They see them as a political opportunity, whether it is young people, seniors or other vulnerable people. We have seen them not support measures such as the groceries and essentials benefit. They mocked the Canada summer jobs program, which offers 100,000 jobs. They just voted, again, against Bill C-30, which is offering skilled trades apprenticeship supports of $31,000 in total for each apprentice. We have cut taxes in a number of areas, including income tax and the consumer carbon tax. We have suspended the excise tax on fuel. We have cut the tax on first home purchases. We have offered enhanced tax deductions for businesses in research and development and for buying new machinery and equipment. If the hon. member really is for tax cuts, why did he just vote against seven new tax measures that will help with affordability for Canadians? It does not make sense to me. That includes Bill C-30, this afternoon at third reading, which the member voted against.

Discussion

No comments yet

See the full discussion

Comment rules

More from sitting 139

  1. Government Orders Spring Economic Update 2026 Implementation Act 53 statements
  2. Government Orders Spring Economic Update 2026 Implementation Act 14 statements
  3. Government Orders Arab Heritage Month Act 3 statements
  4. Oral Questions The Economy 13 statements
  5. Oral Questions Government Priorities 2 statements
  6. Oral Questions Government Priorities 2 statements
  7. Oral Questions Housing 11 statements
  8. Oral Questions The Environment 2 statements
  9. Oral Questions Housing 4 statements
  10. Oral Questions The Economy 6 statements
  11. Government Orders Government Orders 3 statements
  12. Oral Questions Public Safety 5 statements
  13. Oral Questions The Economy 8 statements
  14. Oral Questions Indigenous Affairs 6 statements
  15. Oral Questions Gender-Based Violence 2 statements
  16. Oral Questions Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship 6 statements
  17. Oral Questions Justice 2 statements
  18. Oral Questions Justice 4 statements
  19. Oral Questions Foreign Affairs 2 statements
  20. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  21. Oral Questions Indigenous Affairs 2 statements
  22. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  23. Oral Questions Prime Minister of Canada 2 statements
  24. Oral Questions Official Languages 2 statements
  25. Oral Questions The Economy 4 statements