Parole Eligibility

During Statements by Members, a Conservative member raised parole eligibility for people convicted of murder. He cited the case of Toronto police constable Todd Baylis, saying the officer’s family has had to attend repeated parole hearings for his killer, and argued that victims’ families should not have to relive traumatic events at frequent hearings. He called on the government to require longer intervals between parole reviews, saying the Liberals had made a promise on this that was not kept, and framed the issue as a choice between criminals and victims. The comments relate to a bill amending the Corrections and Conditional Release Act so that parole reviews for murder offenders occur on statutory time frames rather than on the offender’s application.Written by AI from the debate. Updated .

Official text (opens in a new tab)

1 statement

Ned Kuruc, Hamilton East—Stoney Creek

Conservative
“I want the government to make killers wait longer between parole hearings. Families of victims should not have to attend so many hearings to keep them in prison. The Liberals broke a promise to make this change, and they are choosing criminals over victims.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, Todd Baylis, a Toronto police constable, was tragically shot and killed in the line of duty, and now Mr. Baylis’s family has to attend multiple parole hearings for his killer. Victims’ families should not be forced to relive their most traumatic moments just to keep these vile criminals behind bars where they belong. Conservative Bill C-243 would have extended the time between parole hearings, something the Liberals promised the Toronto Police Association they would do. They broke that promise and voted down Bill C-243 last March. Even more alarming is that in January of next year, one of Canada’s most vicious and disgusting criminals, Paul Bernardo, is up for parole. The victims’ families should not have to relive that. The Liberals chose the rights of criminals. Conservatives will always side with the rights of victims.

Discussion

No comments yet

See the full discussion

Comment rules

More from sitting 142

  1. Statements by Members Parole Eligibility 1 statement
  2. Oral Questions The Economy 12 statements
  3. Oral Questions Intergovernmental Affairs 6 statements
  4. Oral Questions Justice 15 statements
  5. Oral Questions Canadian Identity and Culture 4 statements
  6. Oral Questions Justice 11 statements
  7. Oral Questions The Economy 22 statements
  8. Oral Questions Air Transportation 6 statements
  9. Oral Questions Canadian Identity and Culture 2 statements
  10. Oral Questions Foreign Affairs 2 statements
  11. Oral Questions Climate Change 2 statements
  12. Government Orders Building Canada Strong Act 65 statements
  13. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  14. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  15. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  16. Private Members' Business Criminal Code 9 statements