“I share the member's anger. Our police and security agencies work with partners around the world to stop threats, like the recent arrest in Belgium. Because this is an active investigation, we should not guess about the details. We will keep working to protect Canadians.”

“Mr. Speaker, I share the member opposite’s outrage in this regard. Canada’s law enforcement and intelligence agencies maintain strong partnerships with their domestic and international counterparts to identify, investigate and respond to threats, including incidents such as the arrest made in Belgium. This is an active investigation. It would be inappropriate of me and the member opposite to speculate. We will continue to work to protect Canadians and Canadian interests with our partners at home and abroad.”

“Belgium is investigating this matter, and Canadian police and security officials are helping them. We should not jump to conclusions before the investigation is done.”

“Mr. Speaker, it is obvious that the member opposite does not understand how due process works. The Belgian officials are currently investigating this matter. We are co-operating in every way we can, including the RCMP and CSIS. It would be inappropriate for the House to opine and come to conclusions without the full benefit of all the facts that are available.”