Adjournment Proceedings

This debate focused on rising food prices and the broader cost of living. Conservative members argued that grocery bills continue to increase at an inflationary rate that exceeds general inflation and questioned how the government intended for its billion-dollar food fund to lower costs. The Liberal government responded by asserting that high energy prices are driving inflation and stated they are addressing the issue with a $3.2 billion fund dedicated to improving local food infrastructure and supporting community programs. Members debated whether systemic infrastructure changes or direct government interventions were the most effective way to stabilize food prices.Written by AI from the debate. Updated .

Official text (opens in a new tab)

4 statements

Tamara Kronis, Nanaimo—Ladysmith

Conservative
“Grocery prices are still too high, and more people are using food banks. Sending cheques does not fix the real costs of growing and moving food. The government is spending one billion dollars on a food fund, but it has no clear goals. I want the government to report publicly on whether this fund lowers food shipping costs, and I want to know which federal costs it will cut to make food cheaper.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, on May 1, I asked how many food bank expansions the Liberal government needed to see before it would bring grocery bills down. The minister responded by citing the Canada groceries and essentials benefit and temporary fuel tax relief. Well, those measures do not seem to have helped. Nearly six months later, families in my community still need an answer about the price of food. Last week, Food Banks Canada released its latest “Hungercount Report”. It recorded more than 2.35 million food bank visits in March of this year, which is more than double the number in 2019 and up 9% since last year across the country. In B.C., visits rose by 14% compared to the previous March. Behind those numbers are people who are struggling to make their paycheques, pensions and disability benefits cover the essentials. The latest Statistics Canada figures show that grocery prices are 33% higher than they were in September 2020. Of course, the wages and benefits have not kept up with that increase. I recognize that the grocery benefit does help eligible households, that fuel tax relief has been extended as Conservatives requested and that people do need that breathing room, but the government has to explain how it will reduce the underlying costs of getting food onto the shelves. The answer cannot be a never-ending stream of cheques and an ever-lengthening lineup at food banks. For Vancouver Island, that means working with us on improving the infrastructure that supports our supply chains and paying attention to freight, cold storage and distribution. It also means making it easy for local farmers and independent grocers to reach customers. It means removing unnecessary federal costs and barriers, while protecting food safety and strengthening competition. The government has now opened applications for its $1 billion food-link fund. It says that this will improve distribution and lower food costs. Given the ineffectiveness of earlier measures, I would feel better if we had clear deadlines and measurable results. Will the parliamentary secretary commit tonight to public reporting on whether the fund meets its approval deadlines when projects begin operating and whether they lower distribution costs for island communities? Beyond that fund, which federal costs will the government remove to make producing and transporting food more affordable? A $1-billion commitment deserves a clear accounting of what it will deliver. Families should be able to judge the results at the grocery store. The government owes all Canadians a plan that reduces the need for that help. Once again, we find that these plans are short on details in many ways. They are short on key performance indicators, and we lack confidence that they will produce measurable results. When will families in Nanaimo—Ladysmith and across this country finally see lasting relief in their grocery bills?

Ryan Turnbull, Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Finance and National Revenue and to the Secretary of State (Canada Revenue Agency and Financial Institutions)

Liberal

Linked statement

“High energy prices are driving up the cost of food. We are helping people right now by making the school food program permanent and giving families emergency relief. Conservatives are wrong to call the school food program garbage, because it feeds children. We are also spending $3.2 billion to fix deeper problems in the food system. This money will help local communities build better storage and supply chains, which increases competition and keeps food prices steady.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Relevance 91 of 100

    Of this reply, 92% addressed the question or point raised.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, we know that Canadians are struggling with the cost of living. Of course, we also know that the oil price shock is what is driving the consumer price index up. The consumer price index would be at 2.4% if it were not for the rise in energy prices that has driven it up to 3.1%. That directly impacts the cost of food over time, and we see that the inflation of food prices is significant and elevated. That is exactly why we have given families a boost today and a bridge to tomorrow. That includes helping both with more emergency or immediate relief and support, which includes a billion-dollar investment, and making the national school food program permanent. It also includes the groceries and essentials benefit. I am glad to hear the member opposite acknowledge that those programs really help people. Often we hear from the Conservatives that they do not acknowledge them. They call the national school food program “garbage” or claim that it does not serve any food to children, when we know in fact that is false. I have witnessed it with my own eyes when I have toured food programs in my riding. We have also moved forward on a national food security strategy, which is significant at $3.2 billion. Previously, we never had what I would say is a medium- to long-term strategy to address the structural problems in the food system. We have had numerous reports done by the Competition Bureau that looked at corporate consolidation within the food system all along the supply chains. The reality is that this leaves our food system vulnerable to shocks in the global market. Commodity prices affect the input costs for our farmers, the cost of transportation and distribution, and the costs for our retailers, all of whom assume some of those costs and eventually pass them down to consumers in raised prices at the grocery store. Therefore, over time, having a food system that is vulnerable and highly dependent upon global supply chains is not the most resilient strategy. What we are doing is investing in the infrastructure that communities need in order to be able to distribute food and to develop shorter supply chains and more sustainable regional food systems that have cold storage and distribution, that do value added. On Vancouver Island, in Victoria and the surrounding areas, there is much activity in the food system. I have toured it and met with many of the groups in the past. Before I was in politics, I served on the board of Food Secure Canada, an organization that has advocated for sustainable local food systems. This national food security strategy is something I have advocated for since entering politics seven years ago. I am very proud to stand with a government that is making a $3.2-billion investment into the structural challenges in the food system, to develop the infrastructure and capacity at the community scale, to develop more resilience and essentially create competition so independent grocery stores would be able to get access to local food and do it in a more affordable way that is somewhat insulated from the commodity price fluctuations that have made our food system quite vulnerable to shocks.

Tamara Kronis, Nanaimo—Ladysmith

Conservative
“Food prices are rising faster than general inflation, and more people are using food banks. The government creates programs without clear goals to measure success. I want to know how this billion-dollar fund will lower costs, by how much, and by when.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I was glad to hear the parliamentary secretary acknowledge the drivers behind some of the increases in the consumer price index in this country, the CPI, but the reality is that the price of food continues to grow at an inflationary rate that exceeds the CPI. The government comes up with program after program, yet there is a lack of measurables, KPIs and clear targets they can be measured against. Given that in the parliamentary secretary’s own community demand has become so intense that last year there had to be incredible expansion in the number of slots, my question is this: How will these programs work, by how much and by when, and how will Canadians know that this billion-dollar fund actually lowered their costs?

Ryan Turnbull, Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Finance and National Revenue and to the Secretary of State (Canada Revenue Agency and Financial Institutions)

Liberal
“Our fund is $3.2 billion, not just one billion. We are giving money directly to local charities and groups that feed people in our communities. To really stop hunger, people need good incomes. Wages in Canada are now growing faster than prices, and we are creating many jobs.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Relevance 44 of 100

    None of this reply addressed the specific point raised or the topic under debate.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, again, it is more than just a billion-dollar fund. It is $3.2 billion. The local food infrastructure fund has already made a significant difference in my community. There are organizations, mostly non-profits and charities, in my community that offer solutions at a community scale to the food insecurity challenges we see rising in our communities. They are doing a great job. What we are doing is boosting their efforts by offering more financing and support directly from the federal government, which arguably is something we have not had before and is probably the missing piece to really addressing the root causes of food insecurity. Every expert in the country will tell us that food insecurity is the direct result of income insecurity. Therefore, really, the long-term solution to food insecurity is to make sure we have high-paying jobs in Canada. Wages have been outpacing inflation in Canada. The Canadian economy has added twice the number of jobs—

Discussion

No comments yet

See the full discussion

Comment rules

More from sitting 157

  1. Oral Questions Finance 12 statements
  2. Oral Questions Intergovernmental Relations 6 statements
  3. Oral Questions Finance 4 statements
  4. Oral Questions Intergovernmental Affairs 6 statements
  5. Oral Questions Finance 10 statements
  6. Oral Questions Steel and Aluminum Industry 13 statements
  7. Oral Questions Natural Resources 6 statements
  8. Oral Questions The Economy 8 statements
  9. Oral Questions Labour 2 statements
  10. Oral Questions Parks Canada 2 statements
  11. Oral Questions Labour 2 statements
  12. Oral Questions Taxation 8 statements
  13. Private Members' Business Points of Order 2 statements
  14. Oral Questions Finance 6 statements
  15. Government Orders Safe Social Media Act 23 statements
  16. Private Members' Business Protecting Young Persons from Exposure to Pornography Act 7 statements
  17. Government Orders Safe Social Media Act 202 statements
  18. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  19. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements