Finance

Question period on finance ahead of Thursday’s budget. The Bloc Québécois asked whether the budget would address Quebec’s interests, including protection from foreign Internet and energy companies, a doubled grocery rebate, removal of GST on used goods, a pension increase for seniors 65 to 74, a $2-billion reserve for tariff-related job losses, help for forestry companies, and action on housing and homelessness. The Liberal minister pointed to past cultural funding, tax cuts, the dental care plan, child and grocery benefits, and a $10-billion infrastructure agreement with Quebec, and said to wait for the budget. Conservatives asked whether the government would keep its fiscal anchor of a declining deficit-to-GDP ratio, questioned its use of the IMF net debt calculation that includes Canada Pension Plan assets, and raised projected debt service costs approaching 14% of revenue. Liberals replied that Canada has the strongest fiscal position in the G7 and a top credit rating, cited GDP growth, exports and investment, and said the budget, titled “Masters of Our Destiny,” would invest in affordability.Written by AI from the debate. Updated .

Official text (opens in a new tab)

4 statements

Michael Chong, Wellington—Halton Hills North

Conservative
“I asked this question twice last week and got no answer. The Prime Minister promised to lower the deficit compared to the size of our economy. The parliamentary budget officer says the government will break that promise. Will the government keep it in the next budget?”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I asked this question twice last week but did not get an answer. It is an important question because it speaks to the fiscal credibility of the Prime Minister , so again I will ask it. Last budget, the Prime Minister established a fiscal anchor of a declining deficit to GDP. The PBO projects that the government will not keep to this fiscal anchor. Will the government keep to this fiscal anchor in the upcoming budget?

Michael Chong, Wellington—Halton Hills North

Conservative
“The government uses Canadians' pension money to make its growing debt look smaller. Will the government stick to the debt limits it set in its last budget?”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, the net debt calculation the government used in its last budget is the IMF’s net debt calculation, which includes the Canada pension plan. I am sure that Canadians listening would not like to know that the government’s calculation involves using the assets of the Canada pension plan to offset its rapidly growing debt. The Prime Minister came to office with a much vaunted fiscal resume, and again I ask the question, will the government keep to the fiscal anchors it established in the last federal budget?

Adam Chambers, Simcoe North

Conservative
“Paying interest on the debt is the fastest-growing cost in the budget. Experts warn that the government will soon spend nearly 14% of its revenue just on interest. The government does not seem to care.”
  • A repeated line

    “A former governor of the Bank of Canada.”

    Said 5 times by 5 members since April 28.

    Every time it was said
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, a former governor of the Bank of Canada, David Dodge, has a simple rule: The government should be wary when it spends more than 10% of its revenue on debt service costs. The Parliamentary Budget Officer says that figure will grow to nearly 14% in just a few years, and in fact, debt service payments are the fastest-growing line item in the budget. Does the government want this to be the fastest-growing line item in the budget? The Liberals’ actions suggest they do not even care.

Adam Chambers, Simcoe North

Conservative
“Past finance ministers kept their promises to lower the deficit. The Prime Minister is breaking his spending limits at the very first chance.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I appreciate my colleague very much, but let us spare Canadians the lecture. When Paul Martin was the finance minister, he met every single deficit reduction target and fiscal anchor that was imposed. At the very first opportunity, the Prime Minister is choosing to break it. In fact, there has not been a finance minister in over a decade that has bothered to even care to keep the fiscal promise. What good is a promise if the Prime Minister has no intention of keeping it?

Discussion

No comments yet

See the full discussion

Comment rules

More from sitting 161

  1. Government Orders Government Orders 107 statements
  2. Oral Questions International Trade 8 statements
  3. Oral Questions Major Projects Office 2 statements
  4. Oral Questions Finance 14 statements
  5. Oral Questions The Economy 6 statements
  6. Oral Questions The Environment 4 statements
  7. Oral Questions International Trade 5 statements
  8. Oral Questions Foreign Affairs 6 statements
  9. Oral Questions Natural Resources 2 statements
  10. Oral Questions International Trade 6 statements
  11. Oral Questions The Economy 2 statements
  12. Oral Questions Public Services and Procurement 4 statements
  13. Oral Questions Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship 2 statements
  14. Oral Questions Steel and Aluminum Industry 6 statements
  15. Oral Questions Canada Revenue Agency 2 statements
  16. Oral Questions National Defence 2 statements
  17. Oral Questions Health 2 statements
  18. Oral Questions Natural Resources 3 statements
  19. Government Orders Budget 2025 Implementation Act, No. 2 44 statements
  20. Oral Questions National Defence 8 statements
  21. Private Members' Business Respecting Families of Murdered and Brutalized Persons Act 11 statements
  22. Government Orders Budget 2025 Implementation Act, No. 2 21 statements
  23. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  24. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  25. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements