Natural Resources

During question period on natural resources, Elizabeth May raised the case of ten First Nations going to court over the Pacific Link pipeline’s designation as a project in the national interest, saying it lacks a set route, completed engineering, and an environmental assessment, and violates treaty and constitutional rights; she also cited concerns for the B.C. coast and the Salish Sea. Minister Tim Hodgson replied that the project received the most extensive consultation ever held, with more than 100 submissions and more than 100 in-person meetings, and that the government would continue working with Indigenous peoples on project reviews. May also raised a point of order about heckling, asking cabinet ministers not to shout down other members.Written by AI from the debate. Updated .

Official text (opens in a new tab)

3 statements

Elizabeth May, Saanich—Gulf Islands

Green

Linked statement

“Ten First Nations, including one in my riding, are taking the Pacific Link pipeline to court. They say it violates their rights because the project does not have a set route, completed engineering, or an environmental impact study. We need to protect the British Columbia coast, the Salish Sea, and marine areas.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, 10 first nations have now gone to court to challenge the designation of the so-called Pacific link pipeline in the national interest. They point out that it contradicts and violates their treaty rights and constitutional rights, because how can they possibly assess whether a project impacts their treaty rights when the route is not finalized, the engineering has not been done and there is no environmental impact statement? The Tsartlip First Nation is one of the 10 and is completely within the boundaries of my riding. I thank them in their language, SENĆOŦEN: HÍSW̱KE SIÁM. Someone has to stand up for the British Columbia southern coast, for the Salish Sea, for our precious marine protected areas—

Tim Hodgson, Minister of Energy and Natural Resources

Liberal
“We did more consultation on this project than ever before. We had over 100 meetings and over 100 written submissions. We will keep working with Indigenous peoples to properly review these projects.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, the consultation that happened in listing the project the member is referring to was the most intensive consultation ever held. There were more than 100 submissions. There were more than 100 in-person meetings. It was the most comprehensive consultation that has been done on a project, and it was the earliest consultation that has been done. We will continue to work with indigenous peoples to make sure projects are properly reviewed.

Elizabeth May, Saanich—Gulf Islands

Green
“I want cabinet ministers to set a good example and stop shouting down other members. The energy minister yelled over a member who never heckles, and that is wrong.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I rise on a point of order. I am persnickety about the Standing Orders, and I particularly like Standing Order 16. I have never heckled in this place in 15 years. I know some members do, and I find it offensive when opposition members heckle members of the government’s cabinet, but I find it even more offensive when the hon. member for Simcoe North, who happens to be one of the MPs whom I never hear heckle, is shouted down by the bellowing of the Minister of Energy. I would ask that cabinet members try to set an example.

Discussion

No comments yet

See the full discussion

Comment rules

More from sitting 161

  1. Government Orders Government Orders 107 statements
  2. Oral Questions International Trade 8 statements
  3. Oral Questions Major Projects Office 2 statements
  4. Oral Questions Finance 14 statements
  5. Oral Questions The Economy 6 statements
  6. Oral Questions The Environment 4 statements
  7. Oral Questions International Trade 5 statements
  8. Oral Questions Foreign Affairs 6 statements
  9. Oral Questions Natural Resources 2 statements
  10. Oral Questions International Trade 6 statements
  11. Oral Questions The Economy 2 statements
  12. Oral Questions Public Services and Procurement 4 statements
  13. Oral Questions Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship 2 statements
  14. Oral Questions Steel and Aluminum Industry 6 statements
  15. Oral Questions Canada Revenue Agency 2 statements
  16. Oral Questions National Defence 2 statements
  17. Oral Questions Health 2 statements
  18. Oral Questions Natural Resources 3 statements
  19. Government Orders Budget 2025 Implementation Act, No. 2 44 statements
  20. Oral Questions National Defence 8 statements
  21. Private Members' Business Respecting Families of Murdered and Brutalized Persons Act 11 statements
  22. Government Orders Budget 2025 Implementation Act, No. 2 21 statements
  23. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  24. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  25. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements