International Trade

Question period focused on Canada’s trade relationship with the United States. Conservative members asked what the government’s plan is for reaching a trade deal, saying the Prime Minister has given shifting messages about the U.S., that Canada’s retaliatory tariffs raised prices and hurt low-income Canadians without changing American behaviour, and that businesses closing and job losses show the government is focused on politics rather than results. Minister Dominic LeBlanc replied for the government, saying the Conservatives were drawing connections that do not exist, that Canada responded to what it called unjustified and illegal American tariffs to defend Canadian workers and businesses, and that by-elections were called so affected areas would have representation. He also said the Conservatives would not have stood up to the Americans.Written by AI from the debate. Updated .

Official text (opens in a new tab)

3 statements

Shuvaloy Majumdar, Calgary Heritage

Conservative
“The Prime Minister keeps changing what he says about trade with the United States. He changes his mind to help his party win by-elections. I want to know what his real plan is, or if he is just putting his party ahead of Canada.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, the Prime Minister called this the greatest crisis since the Second World War. Then he said Trump is a transformational president. He said integration is subordination and then wanted more integration to “make America great again.” He decried a world of fortresses and then “fortress North America”. He said that we are “at war” and the U.S. wants to break us to own us. Now he has a chat with the President about T-shirts and dress shirts. There is a new deal, the best deal, then no deal beats a bad deal, and now a bad deal beats no deal at all. Every position changes except for one: whatever helps Liberals in December’s by-elections. What is the actual plan, or is it just putting his party ahead of the country?

Shuvaloy Majumdar, Calgary Heritage

Conservative
“The government's tariffs against the United States did not change American behaviour. They just raised prices and hurt low-income Canadians. What is the real plan to improve our trade?”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, “defend workers”? Last month, economist Trevor Tombe told the foreign affairs committee there is no evidence the Liberal countertariffs changed American behaviour, none. What they did was raise prices across the board and slash the income of Canadians earning under $30,000. Liberals are taxing our most vulnerable to punish Washington, and Washington could not be bothered. Beyond the domestic Liberal politics designed to control our national debate, what is the plan beyond “elbows up” to actually level up?

Jacques Gourde, Lévis—Lotbinière

Conservative
“Businesses are closing and people are losing their jobs. The Prime Minister is playing politics instead of getting results. When will he deliver the major trade deal he promised with the United States?”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, while businesses are shutting down, workers are losing their jobs and families are struggling to make ends meet, the Prime Minister would rather play his Trump card. He said last week that he could wait two and a half years to secure a trade agreement. Conveniently, after calling by-elections, he suddenly picked up the phone and called the U.S. President. Canadians do not want theatrics. They want results. When will the Prime Minister finally deliver the major trade deal he promised?

Discussion

No comments yet

See the full discussion

Comment rules

More from sitting 162

  1. Oral Questions Taxation 2 statements
  2. Oral Questions Taxation 4 statements
  3. Oral Questions Publics Services and Procurement 4 statements
  4. Oral Questions Finance 11 statements
  5. Oral Questions The Economy 4 statements
  6. Oral Questions Finance 6 statements
  7. Oral Questions International Trade 6 statements
  8. Oral Questions Major Projects Office 4 statements
  9. Oral Questions Emergency Management 2 statements
  10. Oral Questions Artificial Intelligence 6 statements
  11. Oral Questions Finance 2 statements
  12. Oral Questions Public Services and Procurement 2 statements
  13. Oral Questions Finance 2 statements
  14. Oral Questions National Defence 2 statements
  15. Oral Questions Housing 2 statements
  16. Oral Questions Major Projects Office 14 statements
  17. Oral Questions Public Services and Procurement 2 statements
  18. Oral Questions The Economy 4 statements
  19. Oral Questions Steel and Aluminum Industry 4 statements
  20. Private Members' Business Wartime Service Recognition Act 12 statements
  21. Government Orders Budget 2025 Implementation Act, No. 2 31 statements
  22. Government Orders Medical Assistance in Dying Safeguards Act 177 statements
  23. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  24. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements