Major Projects Office

Question period focused on the Major Projects Office, specifically staff seconded from private companies who work in the office and are paid by those companies. The Conservatives asked how many such staff are paid by companies whose projects the office reviews, asked the minister to name those companies, release the rules, and say how many staff have stepped aside over conflicts, arguing that conflicts are reviewed internally without independent ethics oversight. The Liberals replied that the seconded employees come from sectors including transportation, financial services, and agriculture, that such exchanges have been standard practice for over 50 years involving governments, businesses, and non-profits, and said the office is creating thousands of jobs on projects across the country.Written by AI from the debate. Updated .

Official text (opens in a new tab)

2 statements

Shannon Stubbs, Lakeland

Conservative
“Companies pay staff who work in the government's Major Projects Office. These staff help make decisions worth billions of dollars. The minister will not say where they come from. I want to know how many staff are paid by companies whose projects the office reviews, and I want the minister to name those companies.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, after 11 years of Liberals, there are two worlds: one where Canadians follow the rules and count every dollar but cannot get ahead, and another where political and business insiders get a seat at the big table and make up their own rules. Companies pay staff in the Liberal Major Projects Office, which makes decisions worth billions of private and public dollars. I questioned it six months ago and last night, but the minister will not even say which sectors the staff are from. So much for accountability and transparency for taxpayers. How many MPO staff are paid by companies whose projects the office reviews, and will the minister name the companies?

Shannon Stubbs, Lakeland

Conservative
“Private companies help pay staff in the Major Projects Office, but the government checks for conflicts of interest on its own without independent oversight. The minister should release the rules, name the companies, and say how many staff have stepped aside because of conflicts.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, last night the minister actually called disclosure a “gotcha moment“ when accountability is literally his job. Companies help pay staff inside the Major Projects Office, but conflicts are reviewed internally without independent ethics oversight. The Liberals want Canadians to trust the safeguards but hide how and to whom those safeguards apply. The minister should release the rules, name the companies and say how many staff have been recused. If the safeguards are so strong, why is the secrecy even stronger, and what does the minister have to hide?

Discussion

No comments yet

See the full discussion

Comment rules

More from sitting 162

  1. Oral Questions Taxation 2 statements
  2. Oral Questions Taxation 4 statements
  3. Oral Questions Publics Services and Procurement 4 statements
  4. Oral Questions Finance 11 statements
  5. Oral Questions The Economy 4 statements
  6. Oral Questions Finance 6 statements
  7. Oral Questions International Trade 6 statements
  8. Oral Questions Major Projects Office 4 statements
  9. Oral Questions Emergency Management 2 statements
  10. Oral Questions Artificial Intelligence 6 statements
  11. Oral Questions Finance 2 statements
  12. Oral Questions Public Services and Procurement 2 statements
  13. Oral Questions Finance 2 statements
  14. Oral Questions National Defence 2 statements
  15. Oral Questions Housing 2 statements
  16. Oral Questions Major Projects Office 14 statements
  17. Oral Questions Public Services and Procurement 2 statements
  18. Oral Questions The Economy 4 statements
  19. Oral Questions Steel and Aluminum Industry 4 statements
  20. Private Members' Business Wartime Service Recognition Act 12 statements
  21. Government Orders Budget 2025 Implementation Act, No. 2 31 statements
  22. Government Orders Medical Assistance in Dying Safeguards Act 177 statements
  23. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  24. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements