MEMBER OF PARLIAMENT

Dan Mazier

Follow by RSS

Mazier presses for an investigation into what he calls the $300-million PrescribeIT failure and challenges health benefits for rejected asylum claimants, and sponsors a bill to keep supervised drug consumption sites 500 metres from schools and daycares. He hammers away at a single demand until it is answered, repeating lines like “My question is simple” and asking ministers for a “yes or no”.Written by AI from their statements. Updated .

Average grade
A–
89 / 100 over 40 statements
Signal 83 / 100
Relevance 71 / 100
Respect 99 / 100
Clarity 98 / 100
Loses points more than most for Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business.1.8 times as often as most members.What the tags mean ×1.8 Loses points less than most for Something stated as certain with nothing to back it.Less often than most members.What the tags mean A promise with no date, no measure and no one responsible.Less often than most members.What the tags mean Thanks and tributes.Less often than most members.What the tags mean Averaged over the 40 of 66 statements graded so far.

Statements 66

Adjournment Proceedings ·

Adjournment Proceedings

“The member did not answer my question, so I will ask again. Is it fair that rejected asylum claimants get better free health care than the Canadians paying for it?”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, the Liberal member did not answer my question, so I will ask it again. Does the parliamentary secretary for health believe it is fair that rejected asylum claimants receive better taxpayer-funded health benefits than those Canadians who are paying for them, yes or no?

“The government spent more than $275 million on health benefits for asylum seekers whose claims were rejected. They get extra care like physiotherapy and home care that many Canadians do not get. I want to know if the government thinks this is fair to the taxpayers paying for it.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, it is always an honour to do the late show. I want to begin with a brief comment, given that we are discussing the work of the health committee. We just received word that the CEO and president of Canada Health Infoway, Michael Green, has been fired by the Infoway board. As Canadians are finding out, Canada Health Infoway is a taxpayer-funded organization the Liberals funnelled $300 million through to run the failed PrescribeIT program. This news comes just hours after Conservatives uncovered that Mr. Green pocketed over $830,000 in taxpayer-funded compensation last year, which included a maximum performance bonus of over $215,000. The only reason Michael Green was fired from Canada Health Infoway is that Conservatives exposed the Liberals’ $300-million PrescribeIT failure. The health minister had every tool to audit and evaluate Infoway, but instead she let the CEO of a failing program pocket millions in taxpayer-funded compensation, including maximum performance bonuses. Conservatives will not stop investigating PrescribeIT until we find out where every dollar went and who else got rich. We are not here to discuss the $300-million PrescribeIT scandal, though. We are here to discuss the $1.5-billion interim federal health program scandal. Thanks to my colleague from Red Deer, Conservatives have uncovered that the Liberals have spent more than $275 million on health benefits for asylum seekers whose claims were rejected by the government’s own Immigration and Refugee Board. According to the Liberal government, rejected asylum claimants remain eligible for deluxe health benefits like physiotherapy, home care and speech therapy. As such, my question is simple. Does the Liberal member believe it is fair that a rejected asylum claimant receives better taxpayer-funded health benefits than the Canadians who are paying for them?

Oral Questions ·

Health

“The government gave 300 million dollars to a health project that failed, and they kept funding it even after they knew it was failing. I want the government to support our motion to have the Auditor General investigate this.”
  • A repeated line

    “If the Liberals have nothing to hide.”

    Said 3 times by 2 members since April 27.

    Every time it was said
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, the Liberals gave $300 million to Canada Health Infoway for PrescribeIT. The taxpayer-funded CEO, Michael Green, testified at committee that the Canada Health Infoway board terminated PrescribeIT, yet the health minister claimed it was the Liberals. Officials also revealed that the Liberals kept shovelling millions into PrescribeIT even after they knew it was failing. This $300-million scandal is not adding up. If the Liberals have nothing to hide, will they support our motion to call the Auditor General in to investigate PrescribeIT?

“The Liberals spent $300 million on an electronic prescription program that failed and is being shut down. I want the Auditor General to investigate where this money went, and I want to know if the Liberals will support that investigation.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, the health minister’s officials revealed that the Liberals spent $300 million on the PrescribeIT program with nothing to show for it. The Liberals promised that PrescribeIT would replace fax machines for prescription drugs, but now PrescribeIT is being quietly shut down after fewer than 5% of all prescriptions went through the program. No one can tell Canadians where the money went. Conservatives are calling on the Auditor General to investigate PrescribeIT. Will the Liberals support an investigation or will they continue their $300-million cover-up?

Oral Questions ·

Health

“The government spent $300 million on an electronic prescription program that gave Canadians nothing. I want to know who got that money.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, $300 million spent on PrescribeIT is making ArriveCAN look like pocket change. The Liberals paid Canada Health Infoway to design the program, which then paid Telus Health to develop the program, which then may have outsourced the work offshore. The CEO of Canada Health Infoway could not even tell the health committee how much the government paid him for this failure, claiming he did not know his own salary. Canadians got nothing from PrescribeIT. The $300-million question is, who got rich?

“The government spent $300 million on a prescription software program that barely worked and is now being shut down. I want to know where that money went.”
Official Hansard

Mr Speaker, Canadians are learning that the Liberals spent $300 million on a software program called PrescribeIT. The Liberals promised PrescribeIT would replace fax machines for prescription drugs, but instead, less than 5% of prescriptions went through the program. Now the Liberals are quietly shutting down PrescribeIT, hoping Canadians won’t notice that their money is gone. Given that taxpayers funded a program that they do not own for a service that never worked, my question is simple: Where did the $300 million go?