MEMBER OF PARLIAMENT

Dane Lloyd

Follow by RSS

Lloyd pushes a bill to delay parole for offenders who hide victims’ remains, tougher bail and mandatory prison time for violent offenders, clean water for First Nations like Enoch Cree Nation, and a stronger Alberta within a united Canada, while attacking Liberal spending on the cost of living and youth job losses. He often leaps from a few examples or figures to a sweeping verdict, arguing “It is a direct result of the current Liberal government’s policy.” He backs his points with dollar figures and job numbers.Written by AI from their statements. Updated .

Average grade
B
76 / 100 over 23 statements
Signal 86 / 100
Relevance 58 / 100
Reasoning 70 / 100
Respect 100 / 100
Clarity 94 / 100
Averaged over the 23 of 25 statements graded so far.

In their own words

Loses points more than most for

Loses points less than most for Thanks and tributes.Less often than most members.What the tags mean

Says again and again

Statements 25

Oral Questions ·

Finance

“Government spending and taxes are driving up the cost of living and making debt more expensive for Canadians. I want the Prime Minister to get government spending under control so people can afford to pay their bills.”
  • Opposition question in Question Period

    Reasoning 33 of 100

    This statement drew 3 conclusions, but gave no reasons for 2 of them.

    See full analysis
  • A repeated line

    “Canadian families are the most indebted in the world.”

    Said 3 times by 3 members since June 8.

    Every time it was said
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, the gap in this country between the haves and the have-nots is growing wider and wider. Liberal inflationary spending and taxes are driving up the cost of living for those who are struggling and padding the pockets of the wealthiest. Canadian families are already the most indebted in the G7. With rising inflation and interest rates, they will now have to pay more for their mortgage, car payments and line of credit. Every single dollar that the Liberal government borrows makes every dollar that Canadians have to borrow more expensive. When will the Prime Minister finally get his spending under control so that Canadians can afford to pay their bills?

“The Bank of Canada just raised interest rates, making it harder for struggling families to pay their mortgages and debts. Costs for fuel, food, and homes keep rising because of the government's deficit spending. The Prime Minister needs to stop the spending and taxes that are driving up costs.”
  • A repeated line

    “The Bank of Canada raised its interest rate for the first time in three years.”

    Said 3 times by 3 members since October 30.

    Every time it was said
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, the Bank of Canada just raised its interest rate for the first time in three years, hitting Canadians with higher mortgage and borrowing costs at a time when families are already struggling to make ends meet. The cost of fuel, food and homes keeps rising. Families are already going further into debt each month just to make ends meet, and now they have to pay higher interest. We know that inflation and interest are rising due to the Liberal government’s massive deficit spending. Why will the Prime Minister not stop his inflationary spending and his taxes that are driving up the cost for struggling Canadians?

Government Orders ·

Canadian Space Launch Act

“Maritime Launch Services was a penny stock before the government gave it hundreds of millions of tax dollars. The market showed this company was very risky. The government is bad at investing in private businesses. How can anyone be sure taxpayers will ever get their money back?”
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, before the government announced this sweetheart deal with Maritime Launch Services, the stock for this company was trading at around four cents a share. Following this government announcement, it went up to 60¢, and today it is at about 46¢. What that tells me is that this was an extremely risky proposition the company was putting forward, and the market did not ascribe a lot of value to it. How can the government be so confident that it knows better than the free market how to allocate scarce financial resources, when a company that is essentially a penny stock is getting hundreds of millions of dollars in taxpayer funding? The current government does not have a good record of investing money in the private sector. How can the member be confident this penny stock is going to get a return for Canadian taxpayers?

Statements by Members ·

Alberta

“Albertans voted to say they want a stronger province in a united Canada. They are unhappy with Ottawa, not the country. The federal government must change how it treats Alberta now. It needs to support our natural resources, respect provincial powers, and respect gun owners who follow the law.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, on October 19, Albertans sent a strong message to Ottawa: We want a stronger Alberta within a united Canada. Conservatives for Canada knocked on tens of thousands of doors and reached over a million Albertans, and the message we heard from them was loud and clear. Albertans do not have a problem with Canada; they have a problem with Ottawa. Albertans on both sides of this debate recognize that we need serious reform in Ottawa, reform that unleashes the potential of our natural resources sector, not 10 years from now, but today. We need reform that respects provincial jurisdiction, respects law-abiding firearms owners and respects Alberta’s tremendous contribution to our Confederation. This referendum was not an endorsement of the status quo. It cannot go back to business as usual in Ottawa. Albertans showed the country that we love Canada. It is time for Ottawa to show that it loves Alberta.

Government Orders ·

First Nations Clean Water Act

In response to a question from Elizabeth May

“We must respect First Nations rights. The government needs to stop fighting First Nations in court and work with them instead, so they can get clean water.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Relevance 47 of 100

    None of this reply addressed the specific point raised or the topic under debate.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, we need to respect the rights of first nations. We need to ensure that first nations have a government that will have their back and will not constantly appeal and fight them in court, so they can get the clean water they deeply deserve. It is about partnership and about ensuring accountability as well.

“The government broke its promise to end boil water advisories on First Nations. Many communities still have dirty water, and abandoned oil wells put their groundwater at risk. At the same time, billions of dollars meant for First Nations settlements are being taken by law firms instead of helping people get clean water. The government must make sure this settlement money actually goes to First Nations.”
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, it has been a very interesting debate today on Bill C-37, the proposed first nations clean water act. There is a saying: It feels like déjà vu all over again. Sadly, today is another day where we are debating yet another bill about getting indigenous peoples in this country access to the safe and clean drinking water they have every right to have access to. I think it is a tremendous failure of the government since 2015. It promised to end boil water advisories, and the fact that we are still seeing widespread boil water advisories, which are leading to disease like hepatitis A and other bacterial infections across indigenous communities across this country, is a real shame. I would like to also start by saying that I am extremely proud to be the MP for Parkland. Parkland resides within the Treaty 6 territory, which includes first nations such as Enoch Cree Nation, Paul First Nation, as well as the legacy of the Michel Band, which unfortunately, back in the 1950s, and in a very controversial and what I would say probably illegal action, lost its first nations status. They were enfranchised. I think it might be the only case in this country. I know that members of the Michel Band are still attempting to get their treaty status back to this day. We are here discussing clean water and indigenous rights. I have been speaking with indigenous peoples in my area and speaking with Chief Cody Thomas of Enoch Cree Nation. I have been working with them for years to find ways to address the need for clean drinking water. A lot of the high-profile cases are related to very rural and very remote communities, but they are not limited. Enoch Cree Nation is a nation that is situated right next to Edmonton, and until recently, it did not have access to drinking water from the city of Edmonton. I know it was a very hard fight, but now Enoch Cree Nation is getting clean drinking water from Edmonton. The fact that a first nation that is literally right next to a major urban area in this country did not have access to clean drinking water until very recently I think makes people realize how big the challenge is with getting it to first nations in very rural and remote areas. That being said, there are still areas of Enoch Cree Nation, as it is a rural community in many places, where homes are reliant on well water. I know my family farm is right next to Enoch Cree Nation, and we are on well water. Since the 1950s, there have been many abandoned legacy oil and gas wells and orphaned oil and gas wells. A number of years ago, during a very low period in oil prices, the Liberal government put forward a policy and put forward about $1 billion to try to stimulate the oil services industry in Alberta into cleaning up some of these orphaned and abandoned wells. I think that was a good policy. However, there are a lot of first nations that have these wells. I believe that in Enoch Cree Nation there are over 200 abandoned oil wells. These oil wells risk contaminating groundwater. There are arsenic risks. Unfortunately, when the government announced that program, there was $137 million left unspent. I put forward a letter to the Minister of Finance at the time, arguing that that money should be re-profiled to support first nations in cleaning up orphaned and abandoned oil wells, so they could protect their groundwater, their drinking water. Unfortunately, the government chose not to deploy the $137 million. I thought that could have gone a long way to supporting primarily Alberta first nations that are dealing with this very important issue. I also want to raise another topic. First nations members in my area came to me about part of this discussion we are having today, which is settlements. We are talking about $4.6 billion. It was rightly stated that a lot of this money is coming because of court cases the government has lost. I think a lot of Canadians are wondering, when we are talking about these billions of dollars, where all of this money is going. I am very concerned, as first nations representatives come to my office to talk to me and it has been increasingly widespread in the media that the funds from these settlements are being appropriated by law firms that are supposedly acting on behalf of these first nations. These monies are not getting into the hands of the first nations people who need those funds. This is not an isolated case, and in one case, it is clear that the government had actually been helping to facilitate what I would call the indentured servitude of a first nation. Indigenous Services Canada hand-picked a first nations board, unelected, and this first nations board was encouraged to sign on with one of these law firms. The senior negotiator for the Government of Canada working at ISC, an employee of the Government of Canada, who got this hand-picked first nation to sign on with this law firm quit the government afterward, and guess what. They were appointed as senior legal counsel for that law firm. This is a conflict of interest, and the government allowed it to happen. I want to give Canadians an example of just how bad some of these cases can be. These first nations are signing very complex legal agreements that contain poison pills that are not normal in the legal sphere, whereby if a first nation even tries to seek any form of independent legal advice to ask if the deal it is receiving is a good deal or not, it will be punished by the law firm. Money will be clawed back and members will be punished for speaking out against the law firm. In Saskatchewan, courts have found that these firms have been overbilling these first nations. When we are talking about supporting first nations, the government needs to ensure that there is accountability so that first nations are actually getting the money. Some of the cases that I am hearing are truly egregious. What we are seeing is the term “irrevocable directive”, whereby a first nation is signing away its rights to receive financial compensation in settlements from the government so that the money will go directly to a law firm rather than to the first nation. The billing practices are then not transparent, and Canadians and first nations are seeing this. They are watching their rights being undermined, and the Government of Canada is not doing anything about it. When we talk about ensuring that we get fresh water for first nations and that the Government of Canada is being fair to first nations, we need to ensure that there is accountability in the process to ensure that first nations are not being exploited by any third party actors and that they are fully aware, without intimidation, of their legal right to seek independent legal advice when they are signing agreements that involve their rights. We are talking about very high-profile cases in Alberta, where trust funds contain tens of millions of dollars, possibly over hundreds of millions of dollars, in funds that are intended to go to first nations. These are subject to ongoing litigation, but the fact that we are in a place in this country where first nations have to fight not only the government but the law firms that are supposed to be representing them to get what they justly deserve is a key part of the problem. If we do not deal with that part of the problem, we will continue to see cases of first nations not getting the financial support they deserve to get their water infrastructure and the resources needed to deal with first nations health care. We are talking about cows and plows agreements. We need to ensure that the government is holding all players, including itself, to account. I will certainly be fighting with my Conservative colleagues to hold the government to account to ensure that first nations and indigenous peoples have their rights respected and that they get access to the clean water they deeply deserve and have long deserved. It is long overdue that they get those resources.

Statements by Members ·

Alberta Referendum

“I want Albertans to vote to stay part of Canada in the upcoming referendum. Canada is the best country in the world, and Conservatives are fighting to make Alberta stronger inside a united Canada.”
  • Member's statement

    Signal 30 of 100

    Much of this statement went to praise, blame, greetings, routine procedure or general stories rather than reasons, requests or specific points.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, on October 19, my fellow Albertans will vote on whether Alberta should remain united with our great country or go down the uncertain path of separation. Our country has challenges, but I would choose our country over any other, any time. Former prime minister Harper once said, “Canada is, and always has been, our country.” We want Canada to be a true north that is as strong and as free as it can be in every way that matters, the best country in the world. My fellow Conservatives and I believe in this vision. That is why we serve. That is why Conservatives are fighting for a stronger Alberta within a united Canada, an Alberta that can reach its full potential without being held back by Ottawa. I urge my fellow Albertans to heed this call. Let us be a true north that is as strong and as free as it can be. May God bless our country. Long live Canada.

Oral Questions ·

National Defence

“The government told military chaplains not to mention God in prayers or reflections. This goes against a motion the House agreed to last year. I want the minister to explain why this was done and promise that chaplains will not be punished for mentioning God.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, as Remembrance Day approaches, military chaplains representing many faiths are deeply concerned about government instructions issued over the summer directing them not to reference God in prayer or spiritual reflections. This instruction defies a unanimous motion passed by the House in November 2024 that affirmed the rights of chaplains not to be restricted or punished for referencing God in prayer or reflections. I have raised this issue with the Minister of National Defence. Will he explain why this instruction was issued over the summer and confirm that chaplains will face no consequences for carrying out their sacred duties?

Statements by Members ·

Public Safety

“Liberal policies are too soft on crime and let violent criminals out on bail and house arrest. I want the government to change these rules, keep repeat offenders in prison, and give mandatory prison time to extortionists, human traffickers, and fentanyl dealers. We must also end lighter sentences that keep violent non-citizens from being deported.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, under the Liberal government, Canada has seen an explosion in crime. The Liberals’ soft-on crime policies have allowed hardened, violent criminals out on bail and house arrest. I encounter off-duty RCMP officers who tell me it is so bad that the drug dealers they arrest are back out on the street in mere hours. One such case in my community cost the life of a young girl, when a dangerous criminal on house arrest kidnapped and drowned her. Conservatives want to repeal Liberal bail policies and house arrest for violent criminals and to lock up violent repeat offenders. We want to bring in mandatory prison time for extortionists, human traffickers and fentanyl dealers. We want to end lenient sentencing discounts for violent non-citizens that are designed to prevent them from being deported. It is time for the Liberals to get on board and reject their 10 years of failed soft-on-crime Liberal policies that have unleashed chaos on our streets. Conservatives will always stand up for the rights of victims and law-abiding Canadians. It is time for the Liberals to do the same.

Government Orders ·

Government Business No. 13—Proceedings on Bill C‑22

In response to a question from Kevin Lamoureux

“This is not a new government. It is the same Liberals using the same failed ideas. Canadians did not vote for this bill. They want us to get tough on criminals, not let the government spy on law-abiding people.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Relevance 17 of 100

    None of this reply addressed the specific point raised or the topic under debate.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, the member talks about being a member of a new government. It is the same member, and people can check the Hansard, who has been speaking in this place for nearly 11 years. It is the same talking points. It is the same failed Liberal policies. It is the same Liberal government. In fact, the Liberal Prime Minister was advising former prime minister Justin Trudeau on many of these failed economic policies that we are seeing today, and now we have this legislation coming forward. Canadians, in the last election, did not vote for these policies. They voted to get tough on criminals, but they did not vote for law-abiding Canadians to be subjected to this level of government surveillance.

In response to a question from John Brassard

“The government is rushing this bill through committee too fast. I did not get important documents or meeting notes in time to read them. This makes it impossible for us to study the bill properly.”
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, the hon. member was indeed there. It was very concerning because we had the Privacy Commissioner come to committee, and I had received nothing from the Privacy Commissioner prior to the start of that meeting. The Privacy Commissioner was referencing recommendations that he had provided to the committee weeks before, and I had no idea what these recommendations were. There were issues with interpretation and technical issues, but I could not even get transcripts from the meeting that had taken place three weeks before, where we had former justice Deschamps from NSIRA come and provide recommendations to the committee. I could not even reference past committee meetings. Because the government is rushing through this legislation so quickly, we could not even do proper due diligence. It really did impact my ability and all members’ ability to be effective in scrutinizing this legislation.

In response to a question from Guillaume Deschênes-Thériault

“The Liberal government caused violent crime and extortion to rise by over 55%. They weakened minimum sentences and made it easier for violent repeat offenders to get bail. Conservatives will not take advice on crime from them.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Relevance 0 of 100

    None of this reply addressed the specific point raised or the topic under debate.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, that is a loaded question, but coming from that member and that party, it is quite ironic. The Conservatives are not the party that gutted mandatory minimums and brought forward legislation that made bail mandatory for violent repeat offenders. We are not the party that has overseen a rise in violent crime and extortion of over 55%. It is a direct result of the current Liberal government’s policy. The Liberals call themselves a new government. They have been in power for 11 years, and that is their record. Conservatives will not take any lessons from them.

“Police need better tools to investigate online crimes, and I support the part of this bill that helps them do that quickly. But I do not support the rest of the bill. It forces phone and internet companies to keep people's private data for a year. That creates weak spots that criminals or foreign governments could use to steal our information. The government is rushing this bill through without listening to privacy experts, and it needs more study.”
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, I am pleased to join this very important debate today. I am a member of the public safety committee, and I have been there throughout this process. We have seen in this Parliament the failure of the government, when it brought forward Bill C-2, and the ongoing failure of the government to get legislation moved forward, with Bill C-22. I want to say at the outset that I will be splitting my time with the member for Thornhill. I want to make it clear that we see there is a need for changes to be made to assist law enforcement in this digital age. I saw, a number of years ago, in the wake of a 5-4 decision of the Supreme Court on Bykovets revolving around the idea of the reasonable expectation of privacy in the case of a credit card fraud case, that the methods being used by law enforcement to investigate these crimes, and many other crimes that take place digitally, had been severely curtailed. I worked with my local RCMP integrated childhood exploitation unit and other stakeholders. I think a good solution is contained in what is considered part 1 of Bill C-22. That is not to say that Conservatives and I do not have issues with part 1. There are issues. There are questions about the thresholds, be it a reason to suspect or a reason to believe. One of the thresholds, the one that was chosen by the government, is far lower, but essentially, I believe, as Conservatives, we can support part 1, because we know that, if law enforcement has to reach out to a telecommunications company or an electronic service provider, they do not know whether that provider actually provides a service to an IP address, a name or a phone number, and they have to write a warrant for that process. That is a very time-consuming process for law enforcement. It is like searching for a needle in a haystack. It is very difficult. As such, part 1 of the legislation seeks to create a subscriber confirmation, and I think that this could be an effective way to have something that does not require a warrant and to ask electronic service providers and telecommunications companies a simple yes-or-no question: Do they provide services to an IP address, or do they provide services to a number? I think that this could really cut down on the bureaucratic red tape that law enforcement faces. It could help speed up investigations. That is why, as Conservatives, despite some of the concerns that experts have raised, like civil liberty groups and Canadian Bar Association, we can work with that However, where we really get into the weeds is with the concerns we set out on part 2 of the legislation. Before I get into the concerns on part 2, as they are very technical in nature, but very important, I want to provide a bit of an overview of what happened at committee. This is very far-reaching legislation. It proposes to radically remake the entire paradigm of investigations in Canada. While I recognize that there need to be reforms, when we are dealing with something of this magnitude, that is not something that can be rushed. This is not necessarily because members just want to be oppositional for the sake of opposition. However, it is actually in the government’s, and all of Canada’s, best interests that parliamentarians really scrutinize the legislation, because we know that the legislation is going to be contested in the courts in the future, and we want to make sure that we have the best legislation so that it is actually effective at doing the job. What Canadians fear is that the government could potentially misuse it, and maybe not even the government but malicious actors and criminal actors could misuse the vulnerabilities that the government would be creating through the legislation. At committee we heard from many witnesses, but the amount of time that we had to hear from witnesses was extremely truncated. It was over a short matter of weeks in two-hour meetings, where we had panels of very intelligent experts who had a lot to say about the legislation. Every day I was getting emails from the public safety committee clerk with new submissions and briefs. We simply did not have the appropriate time to really dissect the legislation and go deep down into the far-reaching, potentially negative impacts of it so the process became very rushed. It was a real sea change because, prior to the government’s manufactured majority, it actually had to work with other parties in order to get legislation passed. The cybersecurity legislation came forward, and there were some really strong amendments put forward by opposition parties in this House that were adopted. I think it really made the legislation stronger. However, ever since the government received its manufactured majority, it has not been interested in working with other parties. Now we see that it is using this programming motion to try to ram through the legislation so that we cannot scrutinize it further. I respect the members of our non-partisan public service. At the committee clause-by-clause stage they came as technical witnesses to speak about aspects of the bill. However, during the back-and-forth, it became very clear, and they said as much, that this was important legislation to them as members of the public service, and that they were invested in getting this legislation passed. Many of the amendments that we as Conservatives and other parties put forward were based on the recommendations of the Privacy Commissioner, who is a constitutional lawyer. He is a very intelligent man who I think put forward some very reasonable amendments. We as Conservatives and the Bloc Québécois wanted to have him sit in on the meeting so he could provide his insight on the more technical nature of some of the amendments and the issues we were talking about. The government would not allow that to happen. I think that is where this process really broke down and where it was shown that the government was not acting in good faith and not willing to work with opposition parties. The Privacy Commissioner is not partisan. He is an expert in his field. He is appointed by Parliament. Bringing him forward to committee to help us explore the very real privacy implications of this legislation I think would have done a great deal in easing its passage. It is a gargantuan bill with a number of amendments. It would have taken the committee a great deal of time to get through it, but I think the fact the government was not willing to hear from the Privacy Commissioner showed that it was not really interested in having a serious discussion on it. I want to get into some other aspects of part 2 now. I am very concerned about these metadata provisions. Metadata, for those listening, is the stuff in our phones. It is not necessarily the content of the text messages or the browsing history, but it is very important information about our location, what phone numbers we are contacting and other such things. The government is putting forward a proposal that would require telecommunications and other companies to maintain this metadata for up to a year. It has been ruled unconstitutional in the European Union to mass-keep the data of people in the European Union, yet this is what the government is putting forward. Some people would say that it is not going to misuse the data and that it would have to get a warrant in this case. However, my issue is not necessarily what the government is going to do with it, but what malicious actors would do with it. Imagine this allegory. The Government of Canada tells every home builder in Canada that they need to make a master key to open all the houses they produce and now it has the master key to open everyone’s house in Canada. That is what it is asking the telecommunications companies, the Apples, the Googles and the Metas, for, a master key. Do I think the government or law enforcement are going to misuse it? That is not a serious fear, but who is to say that key is always going to be protected, that vulnerability is not going to be exploited or it would not be stolen by third party actors, foreign governments or malicious criminal networks? The government is creating vulnerabilities in encryption that would impact not just Canadians but people across the world, because the encryption is not just in Canada but across the world. This has now become a trade issue. That is why I am very concerned about this legislation.

Oral Questions ·

Public Safety

“Violent crime has gone up, and the Liberals have been too soft on criminals. Police need tools to catch criminals, but the government should not spy on law-abiding Canadians. We want to pass the first part of this bill quickly, but it needs changes to protect people's privacy.”
  • Opposition question in Question Period

    Reasoning 33 of 100

    Of the 3 conclusions drawn, 2 rested on reasons that did not support them.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, Conservatives will take no lessons from these Liberals on tough-on-crime policies. After 10 years of these Liberals, violent crime in this country has gone up 55%. What did the Liberal government do? It brought bail, not jail for repeat violent offenders. It gutted mandatory minimums. Canadians want to give law enforcement officers the tools they need to catch the bad guys and put them behind bars. What they do not want to see is government overreach, adding surveillance on law-abiding Canadians. Conservatives support getting part 1 of Bill C-22 passed swiftly, but we need changes to protect Canadians’ privacy. Instead of listening, these Liberals are forcing this through with no further scrutiny—

Private Members' Business ·

Ukrainian Heritage Month Act

In response to a question from Dave Epp

“I support this bill to make September Ukrainian Heritage Month. Ukrainian Canadians helped build western Canada, fought for our country in both world wars, and have shared their culture with us for over a century.”
  • Speech on a bill

    Reasoning 100 of 100

    This statement drew 3 conclusions and gave a reason for each one.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, it is a great opportunity for me to rise to speak to Bill S-210. I just want to commend all the speakers today, particularly the last speaker, my colleague from Chatham-Kent—Leamington. I love history, and hearing the stories of people’s families, where they have come from and the challenges they have overcome is always an inspiration to me. I thank the member for sharing. I know that many members of the House who are of Ukrainian heritage, or of that region, have shared stories of the hardships their families endured to come here and make Canada their home and to build a life for themselves and the generations after them in our great country. I must say, I am inspired by that. What the legislation is seeking to do is to honour the contributions of over 1.3 million Canadians who have Ukrainian heritage, including many of my friends. My stepfather is also a man of Ukrainian heritage, and I am proud to represent thousands of people of Ukrainian heritage in my constituency, Parkland, just outside Edmonton. The story of Ukrainian Canadians is inseparable from the story of western Canada and, particularly, Alberta. When the first Ukrainian settlers arrived in what is now Alberta in 1892, they came seeking freedom and opportunity to build a better life for their families. The Prairies were a vast, isolated region, largely undeveloped, yet through determination and hard work, these Ukrainian settlers transformed the landscape and turned western Canada into the developed agricultural region that it is today. Ukrainian settlers in Alberta, in particular, established farms. They built churches, opened businesses and created communities. These communities quickly became hubs for agricultural knowledge; cultural traditions such as language, music and dance; and a strong sense of community. Their contributions formed economic and social foundations for western Canada. Some of the earliest Ukrainian settlements in Canada were established just east of what is now my constituency, Parkland, and these communities still stand today. I want to talk about the service that Ukrainian Canadians have given to their adopted country, Canada. During the First World War, many Ukrainian Canadians demonstrated great loyalty to Canada by volunteering to serve in the Canadian Expeditionary Force. Thousands answered the call to defend the country they had chosen as their home, including Ukrainian Canadian recipient of the Victoria Cross, the highest medal of valour in the British Empire, Filip Konowal, who was also a member of the Governor General’s Foot Guards, which is a regiment I serve in today. At the same time, though, there is a tragic history. Many thousands of Ukrainians who had immigrated to Canada were classified as enemy aliens by the federal government. Ukraine was not a country at that time. It was under the control of either Russia or Austria-Hungary. Austria-Hungary was a member of the Central Powers, so many Ukrainians, unfortunately, were lumped in with the Austro-Hungarian Empire, which we were at war with, and thus were interned in camps across Canada. They were forced to perform labour under very difficult conditions. Many were sent to very remote locations, including areas that would become part of Banff National Park and Jasper National Park. I think it is important that, when we pass bills such as the one that is before us, we recognize the great sacrifices that Ukrainians made, not only in standing up for our country of Canada but also the sacrifices of the Ukrainians who were put through deprivations by the government at that time. The loyalty of Ukrainian Canadians was demonstrated further during the Second World War. I just recently learned this in my research for the bill. Ukrainian Canadians enlisted in the Canadian military at the highest rate of any demographic other than English Canadians or French Canadians. They served with distinction in every branch of the armed forces. They fought tyranny overseas, and they fought to secure the freedoms we continue to enjoy today. Ukrainians have a very real experience with oppression, knowing what their ancestors faced under the Russian Empire, under Austria-Hungary and under the Soviets, and they understood the value of liberty in a way that many people could take for granted. Those Ukrainian Canadians knew exactly what they were fighting for. Since the arrival of the first Ukrainians in Canada over 135 years ago, they have enriched our country in countless ways. They have contributed to agriculture, business, science, education, public service and art across Canada and, might I say, they produced some of the best hockey players we have ever seen in Canadian history. They have preserved and shared their vibrant culture, including the Vyshyvanka, which continues to thrive across Canada. Ukrainian festivals and heritage celebrations are some of the most wonderful events that people can attend in this country. In my own constituency, we have an organization of Ukrainian dancers who play an important role in preserving and sharing Ukrainian traditions. Since 1983, they have connected countless young Canadians with their heritage through dance, music and cultural education while also recognizing and welcoming those who want to learn more about Ukrainian culture. These organizations have been critical in recent years, as we have seen many Ukrainian war refugees coming to Canada. It is always really interesting to see how people who have been in Canada for over 100 years are connecting with Ukrainians who are just coming to Canada today, in the things that they are learning about each other and the traditions that they are reviving together. These organizations are doing more than just preserving traditions. They are building bridges. My home province of Alberta is home to many significant symbols of Ukrainian heritage. The giants of the Prairies, for one, are icons of Ukrainian heritage. This includes the world’s largest perogy, as well as Canada’s largest Easter egg. The Ukrainian Cultural Heritage Village, which is just 30 minutes east of Edmonton, captures the early pioneering spirit of Ukrainian Canadians. This is an open-air museum and it hosts authentically restored buildings from across the Prairies. It is host to many school programs that provide generations of Albertans with a closer understanding of Ukrainian settlement in Alberta. The Ukrainian village suffered a devastating fire back in April 2025, but I want everyone in this House and across Canada to know that the village has finally reopened this year, as of May 16, for visitors. If they do have the chance, I highly encourage visiting this. The influence of Ukrainian Canadians is found not only in the west. It is found right here in Ottawa, where the St. Onuphrius Ukrainian Catholic Church has been preserved at the Canadian Museum of History. The original prairies church is still an active parish and provides visitors to the museum a glimpse of the faith that remains the strongest among Ukrainian Canadians today. Canada has also hosted a number of firsts for the Ukrainian community, with one of the most important being the erection of the first monument to the Holodomor. This was completed in Edmonton in 1983 to commemorate the 50th anniversary of this famine genocide. We know in this House and across the world that between 1932 and 1933, millions of Ukrainians were deliberately starved to death by the Soviet Union. This is not natural in any way. This was not the result of a drought or a failed harvest. It was a man-made famine designed to crush the Ukrainian people. For decades, Soviet authorities sought to suppress the knowledge of these atrocities, but the truth has prevailed through the witness testimony of survivors and through the determination of Ukrainian Canadians who have sought justice and have sought to preserve the memory of those lost. Long before the world recognized the Holodomor, members of the Canadian Ukrainian community were fighting to ensure that this crime against humanity would never be forgotten. Conservatives are proud of our long record of standing beside Ukraine and the Ukrainian community within Canada. In fact, Canada was one of the first countries to recognize Ukrainian independence from the Soviets, and Canada became the first western nation to formally recognize Ukraine’s independence. In 2008, I was proud that Prime Minister Stephen Harper officially recognized the Holodomor as a genocide. This recognition honoured the memory of those victims. Further, in 2014, when the Russians illegally annexed Crimea, it was Conservatives who stood up under Stephen Harper and delivered a clear message to Vladimir Putin that Russia must respect Ukrainian sovereignty. Once again, I am very proud to speak in favour of this legislation.

Government Orders ·

Government Business No. 12—Proceedings on Bill C-30

“The member used to say that high food prices and food bank lines are caused by the carbon tax. I want to know if she still believes that.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, a number of months ago, my hon. colleague was talking about how food inflation is up 6.2% and how 2.2 million Canadians are currently lined up at food banks. She said that this is because of the Liberal government’s industrial carbon tax and fuel standard tax. Does the member still believe that Canadians are lined up at food banks because of her government’s carbon tax?

Oral Questions ·

The Economy

“The government is causing our recession, high food prices, energy costs, and massive debt. I want them to change direction.”
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, this is great news. The Liberal government is finally taking responsibility for something. If it is taking responsibility for today’s job numbers, it must also be responsible for the reason we are in a recession today. It cannot have its cake and eat it too. Canada’s economic growth is negative. Energy and food prices are rising dramatically. Canadians cannot take it anymore. The Liberals promised an economy that would move at speeds not seen in generations, but the only thing we see growing is our massive debt. When will they reverse course and stop failing Canadians?

“Canada is in a recession. Food and energy prices are going up, and the government is failing to meet its budget goals. I want the government to change direction and fix the economy.”
  • A repeated line

    “Canada is the only G20 country in a recession.”

    Said 104 times by 61 members since May 29.

    Every time it was said
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, under the Liberal Prime Minister, Canada is the only G20 country to fall into a recession, with an economic decline in three of the last four quarters. The Parliamentary Budget Officer is saying that the chance the Liberal government will achieve its fiscal anchor is at less than 1%. We are on the brink of a major energy crisis, with rising inflation from higher energy and higher food prices that are guaranteed. Canada is in a recession today, and it is not looking good for the rest of the year. When will the Liberal government reverse course and stop this economic slide?

Statements by Members ·

Farmers’ Days Rodeo and Exhibition

“Stony Plain is hosting the Farmers' Days Rodeo and Exhibition this weekend. I invite everyone to come celebrate our community and its farming history.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, this weekend, from June 5 to 7, thousands will gather in Stony Plain to enjoy the Stony Plain Farmers’ Days Rodeo and Exhibition. Organized in partnership with the Kinsmen Club of Stony Plain, Farmers’ Days showcases the agricultural heritage, community spirit and volunteerism that make our region such a special place to call home. For three days, Stony Plain will come alive with the Kinsmen rodeo, parades down Main Street, a midway with games and live entertainment, and the Farmers’ Days market featuring over 160 vendors. Families can enjoy activities, from the heavy horse pull to train rides and petting zoos, that are fun for the whole family. Farmers’ Days is a celebration of the best of our Parkland region: our hard-working people, volunteers, local businesses and the strong community spirit that brings neighbours together, year after year. I invite everyone to come and enjoy this great celebration in our region. Finally, I want to thank the Town of Stony Plain, the Kinsmen Club, the sponsors, the volunteers and the organizers for making this celebration possible. I wish everyone a fun and enjoyable Farmers’ Days weekend.

Oral Questions ·

Youth

“The government lost 175 million dollars on a failing diamond mine. Canada has lost 111,000 full-time jobs this year, and young people have fewer opportunities because of government spending and taxes. I want to know why the Prime Minister is making young Canadians pay for this.”
  • A repeated line

    “Unfortunately, it is just more taxes, more job losses and more of the same.”

    Said 3 times by 2 members since May 8.

    Every time it was said
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I thought that this Liberal Prime Minister was supposed to be good with money, but they just lost $175 million in less than six months on a failing diamond mine that just sought creditor protection. Young Canadians were promised opportunity, but after a decade of Liberal reckless spending, they are getting fewer jobs and less opportunity. This year, Canada has lost 111,000 full-time jobs. We have thousands of skilled workers just waiting for this Liberal government to get out of the way. Unfortunately, it is just more taxes, more job losses and more of the same. Why is this Liberal Prime Minister making young Canadians pay for his economic recklessness?