MEMBER OF PARLIAMENT

Yves-François Blanchet

Follow by RSS

Blanchet pushes for Quebec to be heard where Ottawa speaks for it — a seat for the Premier at international summits, amendments to Bill C-39 to keep provincial powers intact, a wage subsidy for tariff-hit businesses, money for culture, including the web giants’ levies he says are worth $3.4 billion, and his supply management bill now law. He states verdicts outright without giving reasons, declaring that the Prime Minister “is destroying any attempt to rein in climate change” or that “we now know that the federal government does not want Quebec at the table.”Written by AI from their statements. Updated .

Average grade
A
93 / 100 over 47 statements
Signal 88 / 100
Relevance 75 / 100
Respect 98 / 100
Clarity 96 / 100
Loses points more than most for A remark off to the side of the point.4.3 times as often as most members.What the tags mean ×4.3 Something stated as certain with nothing to back it.2.6 times as often as most members.What the tags mean ×2.6 Loses points less than most for Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate.Less often than most members.What the tags mean Averaged over the 47 of 50 statements graded so far.

Statements 50

Oral Questions ·

Canadian Identity and Culture

“The Prime Minister stopped big tech companies from paying taxes and funding our arts to please the American president. That plan failed. I want to know if the Prime Minister will bring back the digital services tax and make these companies support our culture.”
  • Opposition question in Question Period

    Respect 53 of 100

    This statement targeted a person rather than their actions or views: “simply to appease the American President”.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, the Prime Minister personally cancelled contributions of any kind by tech giants to the economy or the arts in Quebec and Canada, including through taxes or content creation, simply to appease the American President. The effort fell flat. Although I remain unconvinced, the Prime Minister claims to have walked away from the negotiation table for language and culture-related reasons. Since the effort failed, should the Prime Minister consider reinstating the digital services tax and allowing cultural contributions by the web giants?

Oral Questions ·

Canadian Identity and Culture

“The arts in Quebec and Canada will lose $3.4 billion because the Prime Minister gives in to the United States. His plan will not fix this, and it threatens Quebec's culture. Why is the Prime Minister giving up on French-Canadian culture?”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, at least he prepares his answers. That is $3.4 billion that will be lost in the creative sector in Quebec and Canada. The minister is going to invest $600 million that he is taking directly out of taxpayers’ pockets. He is talking about an announcement he made almost a year ago, before all the disastrous decisions made by the Prime Minister, who is kowtowing to the United States. He is even threatening the very existence of the convention on the diversity of cultural expressions, which originated in Quebec. That I know. I was there when it happened. Why is the Prime Minister giving up on the existence of a distinct French-Canadian culture?

“The Prime Minister is not protecting Quebec culture. He is giving in to the United States. Other countries make big internet companies pay to support local culture. Why will the Prime Minister not stand up and do the same?”
  • Opposition question in Question Period

    Respect 79 of 100

    This statement targeted a person rather than their actions or views: “unless the Prime Minister grows a proverbial spine”.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, we predicted his appointment would be a disaster, and it is. The Prime Minister is once again abandoning Quebec culture because of Washington. The Union des artistes and the entire cultural community spoke out against it in the media on Saturday. Their letter is entitled “Chronicle of a disappearance foretold”, because our culture is sure to disappear unless the Prime Minister grows a proverbial spine. The European Union collects levies from the web giants. It even lets its member states add to them. Why is the Prime Minister incapable of taking a stand?

“The Prime Minister is giving in to American streaming companies. He will not make them pay fees, and he is cancelling money for Quebec and Canadian content. This hurts our culture and our artists.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, this time it is clear. The Prime Minister is abandoning the cultural sector in the face of American digital giants. Not only is he capitulating on the levy increase demanded from streaming platforms like Netflix, Prime, and Disney, but we also found out that he will require the CRTC to cancel every last bit of funding for Quebec and Canadian content. Even the meagre 5% that Ottawa was trying to impose is too much for the Prime Minister. In one fell swoop, he is undoing 10 years of fighting to defend our creators. Is he at least aware that he is openly threatening the future of Quebec culture?

Statements by Members ·

Robert Thibert

“I want to honour Robert Thibert. He started a vehicle parts business in his garage and grew it into a large company. He has also raised and donated nearly $2 million to help his community.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, in the 1950s, today’s Quebeckers were French Canadians who worked for the English. With the Quiet Revolution, which was also an economic revolution, the Quebec nation was created, along with a class of full-fledged Quebec entrepreneurs. In their garages, in their basements or on their boats, these small business owners started from nothing, often with the support of Caisses Desjardins at the time, and built Quebec’s SMEs. One of those entrepreneurs is Robert Thibert, who started his business in a garage making rubber mud guards. Thibert has become a large company that distributes various vehicle parts. That is impressive enough. However, in addition to being a tough businessman, although I sometimes find that hard to believe, Robert Thibert is a gentle, attentive, loyal and generous man. For example, he has donated or raised close to $2 million for good causes in his region, in the area around Châteauguay. Let us applaud the great generosity and business acumen of a Quebec builder. Every region of Quebec should have somebody like him. I want to thank Mr. Thibert. The best is yet to come.

Oral Questions ·

Canadian Identity and Culture

“The Prime Minister canceled a fee on American web companies and is using public money instead. This costs taxpayers money and hurts Quebec culture and the French language. Will he reverse this decision?”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, he is forgoing $3.4 billion a year that would come from the United States, and taking $600 million out of taxpayers’ pockets. By asking the CRTC to cancel the 15% levy, the Prime Minister is doing something even worse than merely capitulating. He is validating the Americans’ claim that Quebec culture and the French language are barriers to trade. By replacing the levy with public funds, he is validating the Conservatives’ criticism by making taxpayers pay for the web giants’ share. That is their reasoning. The Prime Minister is sending the message that he is weak. Will he reverse this cowardly decision?

“The Prime Minister is giving up billions of dollars from big American streaming companies. That money should go to our cultural sector. Instead, he wants taxpayers to cover the loss. How can he justify helping big tech companies while everyone else loses?”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, the Prime Minister previously abandoned the digital services tax without any concessions from Washington; there was nothing at all. As a result, he deprived the cultural sector of $1.4 billion. Today, he is asking the CRTC to backtrack on the 15% levy imposed on large online streaming platforms. That would mean once again giving up on $2 billion that would essentially come from the United States. He is depriving the cultural sector of billions of dollars, while saying he would spend $600 million of taxpayer money to make up for that. How can he justify the fact that everybody is losing, except for the web giants?

“The government is asking to drop a 15 percent fee on big streaming companies during trade talks. This costs our culture 3.4 billion dollars. The Prime Minister should protect our culture instead of giving it away.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, here is yet another betrayal of Quebec culture: On day two of the CUSMA negotiations, the government is already asking the CRTC to drop the 15% levy required of major online streaming platforms such as Netflix, Disney+ and Prime Video. After scrapping the digital services tax, Ottawa is once again sacrificing funding for cultural content by allowing web giants to avoid paying their fair share. We are talking about $3.4 billion. Does the Prime Minister know that he is supposed to defend culture, not bargain it away?

Oral Questions ·

Forestry Industry

“Our forestry industry is in trouble and sawmills are closing. The government should pay workers' wages so companies do not lose skilled staff. Will the government use the industry's free plan to help restart lumber exports?”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, in all of this, there is no provision for what virtually everyone in the field is asking for: a wage subsidy program that would help maintain employment relationships, preserve expertise within companies, and prevent foreign workers with specialized skills from being sent home. There is nothing on this for these companies. In the meantime, our forestry industry is in trouble and our sawmills are closing. Will the government implement the cost-free solution proposed by the forestry industry to resume lumber exports?

Oral Questions ·

Small Business

“Trade talks with the United States will take time. I want the government to give small businesses wage subsidies now so they can keep their workers and skills in Quebec.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, we were promised that the issue of tariffs and trade would be fixed in June 2025. Clearly, that did not work out. It is not the Prime Minister’s fault. It is Donald Trump’s fault. One year of dithering later, here we are again, and now the Prime Minister wants a 16-year agreement. I agree, that is fine with me, but it will certainly take a little longer than two weeks. In the meantime, will the government help SMEs with a wage subsidy that would help retain expertise and jobs in Quebec?

Statements by Members ·

Artisan of the Year

“I want to congratulate Jean Morin, a cheese maker in Quebec. He won the Artisan of the Year award for his work and his cheese shop.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, when we think of Warwick, we think of cheese. For world-renowned cheeses and culinary and regional specialties that set trends everywhere, look no further than the best cheese maker in Quebec, who can be found in Sainte-Élizabeth‑de‑Warwick. Jean Morin, the charming, generous and indispensable master and founder of Fromagerie du Presbytère, was named Artisan of the Year at the Gala des Lauriers de la gastronomie québécoise. This is yet another one of the many accolades received by Jean Morin and his team. He has an entire wall of them. It is thanks to him that we have the Louis d’Or, the Bleu d’Élizabeth, the Religieuse and the Taliah. All of these cheeses are a pure delight and pair well with a variety of Quebec wines. A lover of local foods, Jean also knows how to bring people together with his Friday events at the Presbytère, which draw tens of thousands of tourists for delicious picnics and great music. Jean embodies the very essence of one of Quebec’s most beautiful and gastronomically rich regions. Bravo, Jean.

Oral Questions ·

Intergovernmental Affairs

“Quebec's legislature agrees that Quebeckers have the right to make their own choices about their future. I am asking the Prime Minister if the federal government will defend that right.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, the Quebec National Assembly was unanimous in not sharing that view. Some people support sovereignty. Others are on the fence. Some people say they want it later, and some do not want it at all. However, Quebeckers all agree that they have the right to make their own decisions, 30 years on from the shenanigans surrounding the previous referendum. Are the Prime Minister and the government telling Quebeckers that they should not count on Ottawa to defend democracy and their rights and that they can only count on their own will as Quebeckers?

“The Prime Minister said a 50 percent plus one vote for Quebec independence is not clear enough. Quebec's legislature voted against his comment. I want to know where Liberal MPs from Quebec stand on this.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, drawing on his deep understanding of Quebec, the Prime Minister, who said a few months ago that the Battle of the Plains of Abraham was just one big hug fest, very clearly told us yesterday that he thinks a majority of 50% plus one on sovereignty issues is unclear. In that case, I think we ought to start by overturning the 1995 referendum and starting all over. Evidently, this time he should have minded his own business. The Quebec National Assembly reminded him of that with a unanimous motion. There are about 170 Liberal members here, about 40 of whom are from Quebec. I want to know if the members—

Oral Questions ·

Climate Change

“Liberal members care more about supporting the Prime Minister than protecting the environment. I want to know if anyone left in this government still cares about the environment.”
Official Hansard

I apologize, Mr. Speaker. I should have said “the Prime Minister”. Meanwhile, the Liberal Party of Canada’s environment caucus says that its job is not to talk about or protect the environment, but to support the Prime Minister. Now that the member for Laurier—Sainte‑Marie has left, is there anyone with an environmental conscience left in this government?

“There was no oil drilling on Anticosti Island. The member for Laurier—Sainte-Marie tried to change Canada and this government from the inside, but he failed.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I would remind the leader that there has been no drilling on Anticosti Island. Furthermore, the member for Laurier—Sainte‑Marie attempted to change the government and Canada from within. He failed, though I commend his courage in trying. As he said, he had little to no impact under Mr. Carney’s government. Meanwhile, the Liberal Party’s environment caucus—

“Climate change is real. The government must stop building oil pipelines, cutting environmental protections, and dropping emission caps. I want the government to change its plans and fight climate change.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, there is indeed such a thing as climate change. We can combat the effects of climate change, but not by scrapping the carbon tax, not by funding new oil pipelines, not by suspending environmental assessments and abandoning biodiversity protection measures, not by scrapping greenhouse gas emission caps, and not by abandoning emission capping targets. Will the government start listening and reverse course on its huge climate betrayal blunder?

“The government has given up on fighting climate change and forced out its best environmental spokesperson. I want to know if the government realizes it has gone too far.”
  • Opposition question in Question Period

    Signal 43 of 100

    Much of this statement went to praise, blame, greetings, routine procedure or general stories rather than reasons, requests or specific points.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I never thought I would say this, but those of us with an environmental conscience end up missing Justin Trudeau every so often. I sometimes find myself thinking that the Leader of the Opposition misses him too, but for different reasons, and I am sure the member for Laurier—Sainte-Marie misses those days. He has finally had enough of the government and the Prime Minister backtracking all the time and giving up on the environment. They have literally forced out a highly credible spokesperson on environmental issues. Does the government realize that its climate betrayal has gone way too far this time?

Oral Questions ·

The Economy

“Businesses cannot take on more debt to save jobs. I want the Prime Minister to listen to workers and businesses and create a wage support program.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, two things that the Prime Minister certainly knows—and he will explain it himself much better than someone who is not an economist, like me—is that, first, Jean Simard hardly represents SMEs, and second, businesses cannot take on more debt to save jobs. That is a last resort. Can the Prime Minister reconsider—again on a non-partisan basis, since we are reaching out—and do what the unions, businesses and chambers of commerce want and create a wage subsidy program for the transition?

“The Prime Minister did not answer my question. Businesses need help right now during trade talks with the United States, but his plan will take too long. Does his refusal to help pay workers mean he cannot get a deal with the United States?”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, it goes without saying that, unfortunately, the Prime Minister did not answer the question. I will rephrase my question. Given that the measures he is talking about will have no impact in the short term, but only in the medium, long or very long term, and that businesses are in immediate danger during the negotiation period with the United States, am I to understand that the Prime Minister, by refusing to implement a wage subsidy program, is saying that he does not have confidence in his ability to get an agreement with the United States?

“The government's new help for businesses will not save jobs or keep skilled workers. I want to know why the Prime Minister did not use his party's old plan to help pay workers' wages at businesses in trouble.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, the government has announced business support measures that will certainly have an uplifting effect over the long term, but will not save jobs, maintain the employment relationship or retain expertise within companies, especially companies at greatest risk. I want to understand why the Prime Minister did not adopt the proposal initially created by his party a few years ago: the wage subsidy program for at-risk businesses.