← Back to the statement
Statement grade
The average of Signal, Relevance, Respect and Clarity is 66. The grade is held to 59, 30 above Relevance.
59 / 100, held down by Relevance
Signal
62 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Relevance
29 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Respect
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Clarity
73 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Claims 58% Positioning 33% Procedure 3% Reasoning 6%
Structure · 11 steps
Claims · 3
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Claims · 86 words Just recently, the Minister of Industry and I were in my riding to annunce a $35‑million investment in Kruger to help this company diversify its production line and create market opportunities for Canada’s forest products, 1 which is another industry that is struggling right now. Off point In the economic statement, the government announced the Canada Strong fund, a sovereign wealth fund with $25 billion in initial capital that Canadians can contribute to in order to receive their share of the returns generated by the build Canada strong program.2 Positioning · 18 words Canadians are proud of their country and want to participate in this major social project we are building. Positioning Claims · 32 words While going door to door, I also had people raise the issue of the environment. Off point We discussed the auto strategy and the nature strategy. Partly on point We discussed our leadership on the international stage, Positioning · 5 words which we are not abandoning. Positioning Claims · 5 words Canada is upholding its commitments. Positioning · 24 words Canadians and Quebeckers know very well that no party has done as much to protect the environment and combat climate change as our party. Positioning Off point Unearned certainty Procedure · 9 words That brings me back to the topic of pride. Procedure Reasoning · 18 words Protecting our territory and fighting climate change are matters of national pride, both in Quebec and in Alberta. Claims · 31 words We have been witnessing a surge in national pride since last year. Off point Unearned certainty The economic statement tabled by my colleague, the hon.3 Minister of Finance, meets the moment we are experiencing together. Positioning · 53 words On this side of the House, we are taking action. Vague promise We are adapting to a changing world. We are capable of envisioning the future. Vague promise We are not afraid to make the necessary decisions. Vague promise We are governing responsibly and ambitiously, and above all, we are continuing to be there for Canadians who need help. Positioning Off point Vague promise Claims · 22 words The economic statement feeds into the grand endeavour we launched in 2025 to build Canada strong for all Canadians, a proud Canada.
At a glance
Lost points for Off point ×16 Positioning ×9 Vague promise ×4 Unearned certainty ×2 Partly on point Procedure
Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.
What the tags mean →
Signal · 62
10 of 33 deductions are Signal
Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “Canadians are proud of their country and want to participate in this major social project we are building.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “which we are not abandoning.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “Canadians and Quebeckers know very well that no party has done as much to protect the environment and combat climate change as our party.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “That brings me back to the topic of pride.” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “On this side of the House, we are taking action.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “We are adapting to a changing world.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “We are capable of envisioning the future.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “We are not afraid to make the necessary decisions.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “We are governing responsibly and ambitiously,” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “and above all, we are continuing to be there for Canadians who need help.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Relevance · 29
17 of 33 deductions are Relevance
Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the bill under debate.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Just recently, the Minister of Industry and I were in my riding to annunce a $35‑million investment in Kruger to help this company diversify its production line and create market opportunities for Canada’s forest products,” About a local investment announcement in the riding, not the bill’s measures.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “which is another industry that is struggling right now.” A comment on the forest industry from the riding visit, not a provision of the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Canadians are proud of their country and want to participate in this major social project we are building.” About Canadians’ pride and participation, not the bill’s contents.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “While going door to door, I also had people raise the issue of the environment.” A door-to-door anecdote, not about the bill.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “We discussed the auto strategy and the nature strategy.” Touches environmental strategies only in passing, without addressing the bill’s environmental provisions.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “We discussed our leadership on the international stage,” About international leadership generally, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “which we are not abandoning.” About commitments abroad, not the bill’s measures.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Canada is upholding its commitments.” About upholding commitments generally, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Canadians and Quebeckers know very well that no party has done as much to protect the environment and combat climate change as our party.” Partisan praise of the party’s environmental record, not tied to the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Protecting our territory and fighting climate change are matters of national pride, both in Quebec and in Alberta.” About national pride and climate as a theme, not the bill’s provisions.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “We have been witnessing a surge in national pride since last year.” About a surge in pride, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “On this side of the House, we are taking action.” General self-praise of the government’s action, not the bill’s contents.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “We are adapting to a changing world.” General praise about adapting, not tied to the bill’s measures.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “We are capable of envisioning the future.” General praise about vision, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “We are not afraid to make the necessary decisions.” General praise about decision-making, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “We are governing responsibly and ambitiously,” General praise about governing, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “and above all, we are continuing to be there for Canadians who need help.” General assurance of support for Canadians, not a bill measure.
Respect · 100
0 of 33 deductions are Respect
Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.
Nothing lost points.
Clarity · 73
6 of 33 deductions are Clarity
Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.
Unearned certainty Something stated as certain with nothing to back it. What the tags mean → “know very well” Asserts what Canadians and Quebeckers know in place of any source.
Unearned certainty Something stated as certain with nothing to back it. What the tags mean → “We have been witnessing a surge in national pride” Asserts a national mood as directly witnessed without any backing.
Vague promise A promise with no date, no measure and no one responsible. What the tags mean → “we are taking action” Commits the speaker’s side to action with no measure, actor or date named.
Vague promise A promise with no date, no measure and no one responsible. What the tags mean → “We are capable of envisioning the future” A self-characterisation with no concrete commitment or measure.
Vague promise A promise with no date, no measure and no one responsible. What the tags mean → “We are not afraid to make the necessary decisions” Commits to unspecified decisions with no actor, measure or condition.
Vague promise A promise with no date, no measure and no one responsible. What the tags mean → “we are continuing to be there for Canadians who need help” Open-ended commitment with no measure or success condition.
Claims · 3
This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.
1 “$35‑million investment in Kruger” The government and the Minister of Industry recently announced a $35-million investment in Kruger in Caroline Desrochers’ riding to help the company diversify its production. search
2 “$25 billion in initial capital” The 2026 economic statement announced the Canada Strong fund, a sovereign wealth fund with $25 billion in initial capital that Canadians can contribute to. search
3 “The economic statement tabled by my colleague” The Minister of Finance tabled the Spring Economic Update 2026 economic statement in the House. search