Spring Economic Update 2026 Implementation Act

Bill C-30, Spring Economic Update 2026 Implementation Act · Second reading · now law Where it stands

What the law does

The law implements measures from the spring economic update, temporarily removing the federal excise tax on gasoline, diesel, and aviation fuels from April 20, 2026, to September 7, 2026. It lowers Canada Pension Plan contribution rates starting in 2027 and extends extra Employment Insurance weeks for seasonal workers to October 2028. It also makes other changes to tax rules, alcohol excise duties, transportation data, and federal regulation of banking, food inspection, and pest control products.

Official text (opens in a new tab)

41 statements

Steven Bonk, Souris—Moose Mountain

Conservative
“The member laughed at what my colleague said. I want him to take it back and apologize.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I rise on a point of order. I heard the member laughing when my colleague brought this up, so I think the member opposite should apologize and withdraw his comment.

Warren Steinley, Regina—Lewvan

Conservative
“I want the member to answer my question. Are people in their riding actually better off than they were five or six years ago, or have things gotten worse?”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I will go back to the question I had for the member from B.C. I am wondering, how many Canadians in your riding are actually better off than they were five or six years ago? Are there lots of people in your riding saying that things have gotten better, or can you say that they have collectively gotten worse?

Jenny Kwan, Vancouver East

NDP
“People are struggling to afford life while the rich get richer. The Prime Minister's choices caused this. I want the government to tax companies that make huge extra profits.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, there is no question that the affordability crisis is hitting everybody. In my riding of Vancouver East as well, people are struggling to get by. What the NDP cannot accept is an economy where wealth continues to concentrate at the top, where opportunity narrows for too many and where public policy moves in ways that risk reinforcing that divide. This is not inevitable. It is the result of the political decisions of the Prime Minister, and it is within our power to choose a different path. The NDP chooses a different path. We say, let us levy an excessive profit tax for those who are making billions of dollars at the expense of Canadians who are struggling to get by.

Sébastien Lemire, Abitibi—Témiscamingue

Bloc Québécois
“The government's budget fails to address housing and living conditions for First Nations. It missed a chance to let First Nations make their own housing decisions and manage their own housing funds. I want to know if my colleague is also disappointed by this.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I know that my colleague from Vancouver East has two issues she is passionate about: the living conditions and housing conditions of first nations. In the budget statement, the government clearly fails to address two major concerns affecting many Canadians. In the current context, the government has missed an opportunity, particularly to implement initiatives such as the Yänonhchia’ initiative, which provided powers by and for first nations and empowered them to make decisions regarding housing. It also included an investment fund that would have made it possible to reinvest funds. Is my colleague disappointed by the government’s lack of solutions regarding indigenous housing and the increasingly urgent needs in this area?

Jenny Kwan, Vancouver East

NDP
“The Prime Minister is ignoring Indigenous rights. His economic plan also gives two-thirds of the $140 billion for housing to private companies through tax breaks. Very little money will go to building homes for the people who need them most.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, there is no question that I am deeply disappointed and deeply concerned that the Prime Minister has abandoned the indigenous community. He is riding roughshod over and sidelining their indigenous rights, as have been enshrined in the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. On the housing side, the government, in the economic update, actually ensured that the private sector would be the biggest beneficiary of the spring economic update. Of the $140 billion for measures toward housing, two-thirds is actually targeted toward the private sector in the way of benefits, tax incentives and so on. Only a small fraction of the money would actually be invested in building housing. So much for building faster and more for the Canadians who need housing the most.

John-Paul Danko, Hamilton West—Ancaster—Dundas

Liberal
“I want the member to admit that our government's spending helps thousands of private-sector workers, including those in the steel and energy industries.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, it is fascinating to hear the anti-capitalist rhetoric from the NDP, the party that is supposed to be representing workers. Will the member opposite acknowledge that there are thousands of workers who work in the private sector and in the oil and gas industry, who make the steel and the components that go into that industry and who are benefiting from the government’s investments?

Jenny Kwan, Vancouver East

NDP
“The NDP supports workers. We will not force them back to work or make big changes to labour laws without truly consulting them, like the Liberals are doing.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Signal 0 of 100

    Much of this statement went to praise, blame, greetings, routine procedure or general stories rather than reasons, requests or specific points.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, of course the NDP supports workers. We are not the party that will legislate them back to work. We are not the party that will run roughshod over workers. We are not the party that is pretending to engage in a consultative process about major changes to the Canada Labour Code without the meaningful participation from labour. This is what the Liberals are doing.

Caroline Desrochers, Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Housing and Infrastructure

Liberal
“I support our economic plan. People in my riding are worried most about the high cost of living, but they know global issues are causing it.”
  • Question or comment in debate

    Signal 32 of 100

    Much of this statement went to praise, blame, greetings, routine procedure or general stories rather than reasons, requests or specific points.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, it is with great humility and pride that I rise today, as the member for Trois-Rivières, to speak to the 2026 spring economic update and to share what I have heard in my riding, as well as the commitments and actions our government is taking to represent the people of our communities. First, I want to talk about pride—pride in what I heard while going door to door, pride in our government’s actions, pride in being part of this team at such a pivotal moment for our country and, above all, pride in representing a riding that wants to be part of the future and part of the solution. The number one thing I heard about while going door to door was the cost of living. That is really what people are most concerned about. However, contrary to what our Conservative colleagues like to claim about us living in a vacuum, my constituents understand that the global context is having an impact on the cost of living. The dependence on supply chains—

Mike Lake, Leduc—Wetaskiwin

Conservative
“The Liberals cut debate short on this spending bill, but they did not even show up to make sure enough members are here. I want a count to see if we have quorum.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, the Liberals have shortened debate on this really important amount of spending they are doing, and they cannot even be bothered to show up to have quorum. I would like to make sure we have quorum.

Caroline Desrochers, Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Housing and Infrastructure

Liberal
“Life is expensive because of wars and trade fights around the world. Our government programs help families pay for food, dental care, and child care. We are also spending money to build more homes, train skilled workers, fund summer jobs, and help businesses hurt by American tariffs.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I thank my colleague for bringing members into the House, and I thank my colleagues for being here today. When I went out to meet with people, the number one issue I heard about was the cost of living, which folks are concerned about. However, contrary to what our Conservative colleagues like to claim about us living in a vacuum, my constituents understand that the global context is having an impact on the cost of living and the dependence on supply chains. The physical wars in Ukraine and Iran are also having an impact. The illegal and unfair tariff wars are affecting input costs. What I am hearing from people is that it is absolutely critical that we maintain the programs that are helping the most vulnerable Canadians. It is often said in the House that our programs are handouts given to Canadians. These are not handouts. These programs help families make ends meet and have a better life every day. For example, 26,000 people in my riding, Trois-Rivières, are benefiting from the dental plan. There is the Canada child benefit, which 8,700 households back home are receiving. More than 35,000 people in Trois-Rivières are receiving the Canada groceries and essentials benefit. Of course, we cannot overlook the school food program. Thousands of young people in the 22 most disadvantaged schools in my riding are receiving food assistance through the school food program. Canadians are proud that their government has succeeded in protecting its social programs, even in the current context. I would like to talk a little about the housing crisis. We know that rent is one of the biggest expenses for families. That is why we need to build housing faster. Obviously, we have launched Build Canada Homes. In fact, soon we will be studying Bill C-20, which we hope our colleagues will support. Agreements have already been signed to build more than 10,000 units, and construction will begin in the coming weeks. We have also proposed a GST rebate for first-time homebuyers. More recently, we announced $1.7 billion in transfers to the provinces to encourage cities and provinces to reduce barriers to construction, whether related to zoning, densification, or permitting. These are important measures. It is also important to give our young people hope that one day, they will have good jobs and be able to buy a home. That is why, in this economic statement, we invested $750 million in sports infrastructure. We also increased the number of summer jobs, and this summer, 100,000 young people will get their first job experience. In my riding of Trois‑Rivières, these investments add up to nearly $1.2 million. This will give small businesses a break. It will help non-profit organizations expand their services. For example, the Trois-Rivières Native Friendship Centre will be able to accommodate 30 more children at its upcoming summer camp with the help it received from Canada summer jobs. With the economic statement, we are moving ahead with the team Canada strong initiative, which involves a $10-billion investment in recruiting, training and hiring 80,000 to 100,000 new Red Seal trades workers. We want to build at speed and scale. That takes labour. We are rolling out the programs needed to equip ourselves to get there. The people I spoke to also talked to me a lot about the economy. It was the second-most important issue when I met with people in recent weeks. They understand the global context and they understand the repercussions of what is happening south of the border. People told me that they are very satisfied with the government and with the actions that the government and our Prime Minister are taking. I want to quickly tell members what people told me about the Prime Minister. They said that he was the right man for the job, that he governs with his head and that he is the adult in the room. They also told me to imagine what things would be like if the other guy were in power, referring to the Leader of the Opposition. Above all, people talked to me about pride. They are proud that Canada is taking its rightful place in the world. They are proud of the investments that we are making in the Canadian Armed Forces. They are proud of the fact that Canada is not giving in to the will of the President of the United States just to secure an agreement at any cost. They also told me that it is time to build and time to do things differently, to turn things around and to take every opportunity that presents itself. That is what we have been proposing since our government was elected in 2025. Through the Major Projects Office, for example, we will build and expand the port of Contrecoeur. There is the high-speed rail project, which I am sure my colleagues will want to discuss shortly. There is the defence industrial strategy, which will create up to 125,000 jobs. The build communities strong fund provides $51 billion to ensure our communities have the necessary infrastructure. Above all, there is the “buy Canadian” policy to favour Canadian companies in procurement processes. We know that none of this will be built overnight. In the meantime, we know that our industries are suffering because of the global context and the unjust and illegal tariffs imposed by the U.S. administration. That is why we are here to support our businesses and our workers, notably through the regional tariff response initiative, which we enhanced in the latest economic statement: The funding was originally set at $1 billion, but we have added $500 million. In my riding, companies such as FAB 3R, AGT Robotics and Captel are being hit hard by the tariffs. With these investments, they can diversify, protect jobs and modernize their production. This is in addition to other programs, such as the $5‑billion strategic response fund, which helps businesses adapt to the global context. Just recently, Minister Joly joined me in my riding to announce—

Caroline Desrochers, Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Housing and Infrastructure

Liberal

Linked statement

“I support our economic plan. It invests in struggling industries, starts a $25-billion wealth fund that Canadians can share in, and protects the environment.”
Official Hansard

Just recently, the Minister of Industry and I were in my riding to annunce a $35‑million investment in Kruger to help this company diversify its production line and create market opportunities for Canada’s forest products, which is another industry that is struggling right now. In the economic statement, the government announced the Canada Strong fund, a sovereign wealth fund with $25 billion in initial capital that Canadians can contribute to in order to receive their share of the returns generated by the build Canada strong program. Canadians are proud of their country and want to participate in this major social project we are building. While going door to door, I also had people raise the issue of the environment. We discussed the auto strategy and the nature strategy. We discussed our leadership on the international stage, which we are not abandoning. Canada is upholding its commitments. Canadians and Quebeckers know very well that no party has done as much to protect the environment and combat climate change as our party. That brings me back to the topic of pride. Protecting our territory and fighting climate change are matters of national pride, both in Quebec and in Alberta. We have been witnessing a surge in national pride since last year. The economic statement tabled by my colleague, the hon. Minister of Finance, meets the moment we are experiencing together. On this side of the House, we are taking action. We are adapting to a changing world. We are capable of envisioning the future. We are not afraid to make the necessary decisions. We are governing responsibly and ambitiously, and above all, we are continuing to be there for Canadians who need help. The economic statement feeds into the grand endeavour we launched in 2025 to build Canada strong for all Canadians, a proud Canada.

Mike Lake, Leduc—Wetaskiwin

Conservative
“In 2015, Canada had a balanced budget and the richest middle class in the world. Now our national debt has doubled. We spend more on interest than on healthcare, and soon the whole deficit will just pay for that interest. The government needs to explain how we got here.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, in 2015, The New York Times reported that Canada had the richest middle class in the world. In 2015, we had a balanced budget and the richest middle class in the world. Fast-forward to today. We have more than doubled our national debt. The Liberals brag about the fact that we are subsidizing groceries for a third of the population. That is the situation we are in. We are spending more on interest than we are on the Canada health transfer, and the Liberals’ own financial statements indicate that by 2030‑31, the entire deficit would be used to pay interest on the debt. How did we get here?

Caroline Desrochers, Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Housing and Infrastructure

Liberal
“We have helped bring the child poverty rate down from 16% in 2015 to below 10% today. I want the member to tell me where he would cut the budget.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, in 2015, according to another statistic I would like to remind my colleague of, the child poverty rate was 16%. Today, it has fallen below 10%. That is exactly what we are doing: We are lifting people out of poverty. Although I know it is my colleague’s turn to ask a question, I would like him to tell me where he would make budget cuts. Every day, we are told that we are doing nothing right. Could my colleague tell me where he would make cuts?

Claude Guay, Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Energy and Natural Resources

Liberal
“I want to ask the parliamentary secretary what people in her riding are saying. I think Canadians understand that we need to spend money on our country right now during this trade dispute.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I want to ask my colleague, the parliamentary secretary, if, when she speaks to her constituents in her riding, they fully understand the argument we constantly hear from the Conservatives about the so-called Liberal Party credit card. I get the feeling that Canadians understand that we need to invest during this difficult time. We are going through a tariff war. Now is the time to take advantage of the fact that we are in the best economic position to be able to invest in our country. What is she hearing from her constituents?

Caroline Desrochers, Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Housing and Infrastructure

Liberal
“The Conservatives voted against our programs that help Canadians with the cost of food, gas, and housing. My constituents know the Conservatives do not care about these issues.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Signal 39 of 100

    Much of this statement went to praise, blame, greetings, routine procedure or general stories rather than reasons, requests or specific points.

    See full analysis
  • A repeated line

    “The Conservatives voted against all those measures.”

    Said 3 times by 2 members since May 25.

    Every time it was said
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I thank my colleague for his excellent question. When I talk to my constituents, they tell me not to take them for fools, because they know full well that the Conservatives do not care about affordability or the social programs we are putting forward. That is what my constituents are telling me. They know that we are here to support Canadians by eliminating the gas tax, by providing the grocery benefit, by providing the school food program, by accelerating the construction of affordable housing and by protecting jobs in the industries most affected by tariffs. The Conservatives voted against all those measures. No one believes that the Conservatives are actually there for the most vulnerable.

Kurt Holman, London—Fanshawe

Conservative
“The government wastes too much taxpayer money on scandals. I want to know when the Liberals will stop wasting public money.”
  • Question or comment in debate

    Relevance 0 of 100

    None of this question addressed the preceding speech or the topic under debate.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, the member mentioned to a Conservative colleague what we should cut to help Canadians. Repeatedly, with the Trudeau government, we heard about scandal upon scandal and about the waste of taxpayers’ dollars. I am concerned, even with the current Liberal government, of potentially more scandals with regard to wasting taxpayers’ dollars. Is the Liberal government going to come to terms and stop wasting taxpayers’ dollars on behalf of all Canadians?

Caroline Desrochers, Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Housing and Infrastructure

Liberal
“Our plan makes sense. We are spending $1.5 billion to help industries hurt by the trade war, building infrastructure, and training 100,000 young people in the trades. We are doing this while lowering the deficit, and the opposition should stop putting Canadians down for renting or using social programs.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Signal 40 of 100

    Much of this statement went to praise, blame, greetings, routine procedure or general stories rather than reasons, requests or specific points.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I understand that it is hard for them to come up with a plan that makes sense. That is exactly what we are proposing: a plan that makes sense. I repeat, we have announced $1.5 billion to help the industries most affected by the trade war. We are investing in our infrastructure to build the Canada of tomorrow. We are going to train 100,000 youths in specialized trades to put them at the centre of the major projects that we are going to build. We are doing all this while reducing the deficit, which according to the economic statement is down from $78 million to $67 million. I will say this in English, because I do not have the right words in French. I am so tired of hearing about the social programs as if they are handouts, and of hearing about people who need to rent apartments as if “Why are you guys building apartments? People want to own their home.” Through the Chair, please stop putting Canadians down.

Mike Lake, Leduc—Wetaskiwin

Conservative
“We would cut the laws that hurt Alberta's oil industry. The Liberals spend too much money, and now we spend more on debt interest than on health care. This high debt will eventually force cuts to health and social services, which hurts vulnerable people. The government needs a plan to balance the budget.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I listened closely to the hon. parliamentary secretary’s speech. At one point she did ask what we would cut. Let me be very clear, because she also referenced my home province of Alberta in kind of a flippant way. The first things we would cut would be Bill C-69 and Bill C-48, which have made it impossible to compete in the global environment where, believe it or not, oil coming to Canada from Algeria, Nigeria and Saudi Arabia faces fewer restrictions and less rigorous regulation around reporting than oil coming from Alberta being sold in our own country. Bill C-69 and Bill C-48 are where we would start cutting. An hon. member: Oh, oh! Hon. Mike Lake: I know the member is heckling me, Mr. Speaker, but I do want to talk about something fairly serious to me. She made the assertion that Conservatives do not care about the most vulnerable. The member is new to the House and is mocking me as she smiles. The member might not know that I have a son with autism. He is 30 years old. I talk about this a lot in the House. In 1995, when we were in a similar situation to what we are in now and we had a Liberal government dealing with a generation after the 14 out of 15 deficits that the former Trudeau government had run, that Liberal government, under Paul Martin, was forced to cut 32% from transfers for health, social services and education. Every province in the country and every vulnerable Canadian in the country had to pay the consequences of those devastating cuts. Those devastating cuts happened for exactly the same reason, because of the exact same type of fiscal policy that the current Liberal government is running. We have massive deficits, a situation I mentioned a few minutes ago in which we are paying more on interest today than we are on the Canadian health transfer. Because of deliberate spending decisions made by the member’s government, today we are spending more on interest than we are on the Canadian health transfer. The Liberals’ own budget documents presented in the spring economic statement indicate that by 2030, we are going to be using the entire deficit to pay off interest on the debt. It is the equivalent of going to a bank, getting a mortgage and convincing the bank to allow payment of only the interest on that mortgage, not paying off any of the principal but only making interest payments on the mortgage. That is the situation we are in today. Another Liberal member just called that the best fiscal situation in the world. That is laughable. There is no Canadian who believes that right now. I have a quote from C.S. Lewis. This goes back a while, but I find it a perfect quote for where we are right now. Lewis said: We all want progress. But progress means getting nearer to the place you want to be. And if you have taken a wrong turning, then to go forward does not get you any nearer. If you are on the wrong road, progress means doing an about-turn and walking back to the right road; and in that case the [one] who turns back soonest is the most progressive.... We need to turn back. We need to get this country’s fiscal situation back on track. We need to have a plan, at least someone on the government side who indicates that it is important to one day get back to a balanced budget and a time when we have the flexibility to make the best decisions we can for all Canadians, including the most vulnerable.

John-Paul Danko, Hamilton West—Ancaster—Dundas

Liberal
“The International Monetary Fund says Canada has the strongest economy in the G7. The member opposite does not understand the difference between investing money and just spending it.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, the International Monetary Fund said straight up that Canada is in the best fiscal position of the G7. I am wondering if the member opposite understands the difference between investment and spending, because Canadians sure do.

Mike Lake, Leduc—Wetaskiwin

Conservative
“In 2015, Canada had a balanced budget and the richest middle class in the world. Our economy is much worse now.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Relevance 49 of 100

    None of this reply addressed the specific point raised or the topic under debate.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, all I can say is that, in 2015, we had a balanced budget and the richest middle class in the world, and we are a long ways from there today.

Discussion

No comments yet

See the full discussion

Comment rules

More from sitting 121

  1. Private Members' Business Criminal Code 10 statements
  2. Private Members' Business Points of Order 2 statements
  3. Government Orders Spring Economic Update 2026 Implementation Act 37 statements
  4. Government Orders Government Orders 17 statements
  5. Oral Questions Taxation 6 statements
  6. Oral Questions Intergovernmental Relations 6 statements
  7. Oral Questions Employment 4 statements
  8. Oral Questions Finance 2 statements
  9. Oral Questions Taxation 4 statements
  10. Oral Questions Indigenous Affairs 6 statements
  11. Oral Questions Public Safety 2 statements
  12. Oral Questions Foreign Investment 2 statements
  13. Oral Questions Indigenous Affairs 10 statements
  14. Oral Questions Justice 6 statements
  15. Oral Questions Foreign Affairs 2 statements
  16. Oral Questions CBC/Radio-Canada 2 statements
  17. Oral Questions The Environment 2 statements
  18. Oral Questions Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship 7 statements
  19. Government Orders Privilege 4 statements
  20. Government Orders Military Justice System Modernization Act 2 statements
  21. Government Orders Government Orders 2 statements
  22. ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS 2 statements
  23. Government Orders Spring Economic Update 2026 Implementation Act 61 statements
  24. Oral Questions The Environment 4 statements
  25. Oral Questions Aerospace Industry 2 statements
  26. Oral Questions Taxation 8 statements
  27. Oral Questions The Economy 6 statements
  28. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  29. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  30. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  31. Government Orders Spring Economic Update 2026 Implementation Act 41 statements