Analysis · Members' statement · beta

Chak Au

Conservative on Chinese Canadians of Force 136 2026-11-06

126 words · 10 sentences · 10 clauses

Statement grade

–

Not graded

A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.

Claims 79%Reasoning 5%The ask 13%Positioning 2%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Claims · 78 wordsas Remembrance Day approaches, we honour the Chinese Canadians of Force 136. For decades, their story has remained largely untold. During the Second World War, they volunteered for dangerous secret missions behind enemy lines in Asia. They risked their lives for Canada while facing discrimination and being denied the right to vote at home.¹ They fought for freedom overseas and helped advance equality at home. This week, I attended the unveiling of Canada Post’s stamp honouring their service.² Reasoning · 6 wordsTheir stories show why recognition matters. Claims · 22 wordsMy motion, Motion No. 32, would designate June 22 as national Chinese Canadian contributions day and June as Chinese Canadian contributions month.³ The ask · 17 wordsI urge all members to support this motion and honour those who helped build and defend Canada. Positioning · 3 wordsLest we forget.Positioning

At a glance

Lost points for

Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.

What the tags mean

Signal · 97

1 of 1 deductions are Signal

Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.

Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it.What the tags mean “Lest we forget.”Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.

Relevance · no score

Not applicable: nothing to answer. Excluded from the average.

Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue.

Respect · 100

0 of 1 deductions are Respect

Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.

Nothing lost points.

Clarity · 100

0 of 1 deductions are Clarity

Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.

Nothing lost points.

Claims · 3

This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.

1“being denied the right to vote”Chinese Canadians were denied the right to vote in Canada before the Second World War era.search
2“I attended the unveiling of Canada Post’s stamp honouring their service”Canada Post unveiled a stamp honouring the Chinese Canadians of Force 136, at an event the speaker attended this week (November 2026).search
3“Motion No. 32, would designate June 22 as national Chinese Canadian contributions day and June as Chinese Canadian contributions month”Motion No. 32, sponsored by Chak Au, would designate June 22 as national Chinese Canadian contributions day and June as Chinese Canadian contributions month.search

Analysed on 2026-11-07