Crime & safety

Penalties for religious property mischief

C-255 An Act to amend the Criminal Code (mischief — religious property)

Increases the criminal penalties for committing mischief against religious property.

What Bill C-255 would do

This bill would amend the Criminal Code to increase the punishment for mischief relating to religious property. The published material gives no further detail.

Official summary

This enactment amends the Criminal Code to increase the punishment for mischief relating to religious property.

Kind
Private member's bill
Sponsor
Kelly Block, Member of Parliament (Carlton Trail—Eagle Creek)
Introduced
in the House of Commons
Last activity

Where it stands

  1. ProposedNov 6, 2025
  2. Being debatedsince Nov 6, 2025 Exact stageAt second reading in the House of Commons · since November 6, 2025MPs or senators are debating it in the chamber where it started.
  3. Almost law
  4. Law

First debate in the House: 1 day so far

  1. First reading in the House done

    Before the House on 1 sitting day,

  2. Second reading in the House now

    Before the House on 1 sitting day, · 1 debate here

  3. Committee in the House not yet

  4. Report stage in the House not yet

  5. Third reading in the House not yet

  6. First reading in the Senate not yet

  7. Second reading in the Senate not yet

  8. Third reading in the Senate not yet

  9. Royal assent not yet

Exact procedural stages
  1. House
    1. First reading in the House: done, 2025-11-06
    2. Second reading in the House: current stage
    3. Committee in the House: not yet reached
    4. Report stage in the House: not yet reached
    5. Third reading in the House: not yet reached
  2. Senate
    1. First reading in the Senate: not yet reached
    2. Second reading in the Senate: not yet reached
    3. Third reading in the Senate: not yet reached
  3. Royal assent
    1. Royal assent: not yet reached

Debates in the House 1

Members who spoke: Conservative 3 Liberal 2 Bloc Québécois 1

Second reading 1

  1. Criminal Code

    6 members spoke

Discussion

No comments yet

See the full discussion

Comment rules