Adjournment Proceedings

In adjournment proceedings, Conservative MP William Stevenson raised the cost of living, saying his constituents face high fuel taxes, rising grocery prices, a complicated tax system and privacy problems at the tax agency, and asking the government to suspend all federal fuel taxes for the rest of the year. Liberal MP Ryan Turnbull replied that the government is cutting taxes and funding programs such as child care, school food and automatic tax filing to help with costs. He said Conservatives vote against these measures, and pressed them on how they would vote on the spring economic update, which he said funds training for up to 100,000 trades workers. Stevenson repeated that the government’s tax relief was not enough and renewed his call to remove federal gas taxes for the year.Written by AI from the debate. Updated .

Official text (opens in a new tab)

4 statements

William Stevenson, Yellowhead

Conservative
“My constituents are not getting mail from my office because of delivery problems. Our tax system is too complicated and the tax agency is failing to protect people's private information. High fuel taxes make gas and groceries too expensive. I want the government to cancel all federal fuel taxes for the rest of the year.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, over the past year, I have sent various reports and updates to households and businesses across the 35 communities of my beautiful riding. Yellowhead, this last election, has significantly changed boundaries, incorporating areas from five previous ridings. One of the mailers was a tax guide to help individuals, families and businesses to keep more of their hard-earned dollars. Many have found this mailer very helpful. However, hundreds, if not thousands, of my constituents did not receive it due to a lack of coordination between Canada Post, Elections Canada and the House of Commons printing services. I encourage those watching to visit my website and review my monthly updates, but please know that my team and I are actively working with all parties involved to resolve these delivery issues so that they receive the information they expect from their member of Parliament. People have the right to hear from their elected officials. Taxpayers are paying for the service, and it is unacceptable that my constituents are not receiving it. As the only CPA with public practice experience in the House, every day I hear from law-abiding Canadians and professional accountants. People are struggling to navigate an increasingly complex tax system. Individuals with limited Internet and those lacking computer skills are being discriminated against when dealing with CRA and their access. A recent report out of British Columbia is deeply concerning. A Canada Revenue Agency employee has been charged after allegedly compromising sensitive tax information and is now facing charges including breach of trust, identity theft and fraud following a multi-year investigation. While honest taxpayers are being burdened, cases like this raise questions. Canadians expect the CRA to protect their sensitive financial information. Instead, we see situations where bad actors within the system are able to access, misuse and abuse the data for years before being caught. Tax fairness is not just about how much people pay. It is about ensuring that the system treats everyone equally. That means going after the wrongdoers while respecting and supporting the millions of Canadians who follow the rules. In April, in response to my question regarding removal of all gas taxes, the Liberal minister said that “Albertans are looking for the government to provide solutions” and claimed that her government is “delivering”. What is true is that Albertans are looking for change. What is lacking is any proof that the government is actually delivering. Real action would mean scrapping all federal gas and diesel taxes for the rest of the year, not pausing a third of the taxes for a third of the year. That is not delivery; that is a headline. Statistics Canada has confirmed that Canada continues to have the worst food inflation in the G7. Even with the temporary pause of the excise tax, Canadians are still paying nearly 15% more at the pump than Americans, due to the higher taxes and our weaker dollar. Families feel this every day. Higher fuel costs drive up prices across the board, forcing Canadians to choose between filling their tank and filling their grocery cart. Therefore, I will ask again: If the government knows that energy costs drive everything else, why will it not remove all federal fuel taxes and deliver real relief?

Ryan Turnbull, Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Finance and National Revenue and to the Secretary of State (Canada Revenue Agency and Financial Institutions)

Liberal
“Our government is helping Canadians with the high cost of living by cutting taxes and funding programs like child care and school food. We are also setting up automatic tax filing to make it easier for people to get their benefits. The Conservatives vote against these supports, but we will keep spending money to help people and grow the economy.”
  • A repeated line

    “That is how we build Canada strong.”

    Said 20 times by 14 members since April 23.

    Every time it was said
Official Hansard

Clearly, Mr. Speaker, Canadians are navigating a rapidly changing, increasingly fragmented and volatile global economy, one that is more complex, more unpredictable and, for many, more costly as well. In response, our government continues to focus on what we can control, which is building a strong Canadian economy and diversifying our trade partners abroad. We see signs of progress, with 20 new trade and security agreements signed and a 36% increase in non-U.S. trade, which is significant. We are also focused on delivering responsible fiscal management and supporting Canadians who are under pressure from everyday expenses. Just last week, on Friday, I had the opportunity to list 19 different tax cuts that our government has made. There was no response from the Conservatives, of course, because they did not support 99% of them. I think there might have been one they allowed to pass, but I am sure if they could have blocked them, they would have done so, because that is exactly what we see in this House: the Conservatives obstructing and voting against the very things that help Canadians, whether it is child care or a national school food program, a groceries and essentials benefit, an income tax cut, suspending the fuel excise tax, and on and on. Every single measure we put forward that actually helps to tangibly reduce the cost of living pressures on Canadians, they vote against and oppose. I do not know how they can stand up in the House and say they actually care about households and the cost of living. The other thing the member opposite suggested is that the tax system has become more complex. It is true, as we offer investment tax credits for businesses and waive, or increase deductions for, certain kinds of expenses, or as we help tradespeople who are moving across the country, relocating for work, by allowing them to deduct more of those expenses, that it is more complex for Canadians. However, we have also moved forward with an automatic tax filing system and initiative that will help millions of Canadians who, for the many accessing federal benefits and supports, rely on filing their taxes. We know full well that it will help with simple tax filings. It also means that other Canadians will be able to get access to benefits because it better utilizes government resources to help those with the simplest tax filings to access the tax benefits and federal payments they are eligible for. We are stepping up to help out. We have fiscal strength. The IMF said recently that we have the strongest fiscal position in the G7 and that we should use our fiscal capacity, which is exactly what the federal government is doing. I know Conservatives would never invest in Canadians. They do not believe in Canadians. They do not believe in boosting the economy. That is not the Liberal Party’s position. Our position is to use our fiscal capacity to boost our economy. We see those investments coming to fruition and manifesting good-paying jobs for generations to come. That is the prosperity we are building. That is how we build Canada strong, and we are not going to back down just because Conservatives talk a good game in this House.

William Stevenson, Yellowhead

Conservative
“Canadians are struggling with high gas prices and inflation. The government's small tax cut is not enough. I want the government to remove all federal gas taxes for the rest of the year.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, three years ago, before the crisis got worse, Conservatives called upon the Liberals to suspend gas taxes for the summer so that Canadians could afford a simple road trip. The Liberals voted no. Now, after years of inflation, with higher grocery costs and during an international energy crisis, we are calling for a stronger measure: to remove all federal fuel taxes for the rest of the year. Once again, the Liberals refuse to act. Instead, the Prime Minister offered a half measure, cutting a third of the taxes for a third of the year. This might have helped back in 2023, but not now. Canadians are struggling. The cheapest gas around is reaching two dollars a litre. People cannot afford a government that is constantly behind. When will the government stop pretending to help and actually deliver real relief?

Ryan Turnbull, Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Finance and National Revenue and to the Secretary of State (Canada Revenue Agency and Financial Institutions)

Liberal
“I want to know how the Conservatives will vote on our budget plan. It gives money to help businesses hire up to 100,000 new trades workers. The Conservatives say they care about workers, but they vote against our plans to help them.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Relevance 2 of 100

    None of this reply addressed the specific point raised or the topic under debate.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, actions speak louder than words, and what we see is that the words of Conservatives in this House do not match how they vote. They do not support any of the measures our government has put forward. How are they going to vote on the spring economic update? That is what I would like to know. There are 80,000 to 100,000 new skilled trades workers hanging in the balance in terms of support: a $10,000 incentive for a small or medium-sized company to hire an apprentice, $400 a week up to about $16,000 for a new apprentice, plus a completion bonus of $5,000 for 80,000 to 100,000 workers. How are the Conservatives going to vote? The Conservatives have said in the House that they do not support these investments in the workforce in Canada. How can they not support workers across this country while standing up and saying that they care about families, affordability and industries that are affected by tariffs that the United States has put on us? How can they not support workers? How are they going to vote?

Discussion

No comments yet

See the full discussion

Comment rules

More from sitting 116

  1. Government Orders Military Justice System Modernization Act 35 statements
  2. Private Members' Business Criminal Code 13 statements
  3. Government Orders Government Orders 8 statements
  4. Oral Questions Finance 4 statements
  5. Oral Questions Natural Resources 4 statements
  6. Oral Questions Finance 4 statements
  7. Oral Questions The Economy 6 statements
  8. Oral Questions Finance 4 statements
  9. Oral Questions Natural Resources 4 statements
  10. Oral Questions Taxation 4 statements
  11. Oral Questions Finance 2 statements
  12. Oral Questions Public Services and Procurement 4 statements
  13. Oral Questions Finance 4 statements
  14. Oral Questions The Economy 4 statements
  15. Oral Questions Finance 2 statements
  16. Oral Questions Veterans 2 statements
  17. Oral Questions Natural Resources 7 statements
  18. Oral Questions Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship 10 statements
  19. Oral Questions Emergency Management 2 statements
  20. Oral Questions Indigenous Affairs 6 statements
  21. Oral Questions Northern Affairs 2 statements
  22. Oral Questions Indigenous Affairs 3 statements
  23. Oral Questions The Economy 5 statements
  24. Government Orders Report Stage 86 statements
  25. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  26. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  27. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements