“A program spent $300 million for nothing. The CEO got $1 million a year. The minister is responsible. Will she admit this waste and abuse?”
What they said. What they meant.
Plain-language translations from the House of Commons.
Recent debates
8 latest topics
Spring Economic Update 2026 Implementation Act
57 statements
Spring Economic Update 2026 Implementation Act
19 statements
Arab Heritage Month Act
5 statements
The Economy
15 statements
Government Priorities
2 statements
Government Priorities
2 statements
Housing
12 statements
The Environment
2 statements
Oral Questions
Health
The opposition grilled the government on a $300 million e-prescription program called PrescribeIT that was cancelled due to low uptake. Taxpayers footed huge executive salaries before it was scrapped. The government deflected, saying the program started under the previous government and they made the tough call to end it when it wasn't working.
“A program spent lots of money under the other guys. We kept it going. When it failed we stopped.”
“You spent $300 million. The minister wasn't watching. People got your money. That's bad. I don't like that. I think it's very bad.”
“The program spent money. It didn't work out. We stopped it. We will spend money on other things.”
“The program was bad. It spent a lot. It didn't work. It made our friends money. Now you want to spend more. I want to blame you and stop you.”
“What this means is the Conservative government is going to take money away from programs that aren't working and give it to programs that do work.”