Adjournment Proceedings

An adjournment debate on federal funding for PrescribeIT, an electronic prescription system, and a call for an investigation of the roughly $300 million spent on it. Dan Mazier of the Conservatives asked that the health committee investigate the spending and said Liberals were using a study on HIV to avoid it; he pressed the parliamentary secretary to answer yes or no on whether she supported an investigation. Maggie Chi, the Liberal parliamentary secretary, said ending federal funding was planned because provinces and territories were always meant to take it over, noting Quebec had agreed to pay, and said it is the Conservatives who are obstructing the committee by blocking a study of rising HIV rates in Manitoba. Each side accused the other of obstructing the committee’s work, and no direct yes-or-no answer was given.Written by AI from the debate. Updated .

Official text (opens in a new tab)

2 statements

Dan Mazier, Riding Mountain

Conservative
“The health committee should investigate how the government spent 300 million dollars on the PrescribeIT program. The Liberals are trying to block this investigation, and they are using a study on HIV as an excuse to do it. Will the parliamentary secretary agree to a full investigation?”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, it is always a pleasure to be here at the late show. Canadians across the country are demanding that the health committee investigate the Liberals’ $300-million PrescribeIT scandal. When Conservatives called on the Auditor General to investigate, the Liberal Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Health moved to turn off the committee cameras. Since then, she has refused to explain herself to the committee. She has refused to explain herself to Parliament. She has refused to explain herself to the media. She has refused to explain herself to her constituents, and she has refused to explain herself to Canadians. Now the Liberals are pulling an even more disgusting political stunt. They are using Canadians suffering with HIV as an excuse to bury the truth. They are hiding behind an HIV study, a study that Conservatives have publicly agreed to support, to stop the health committee from working and to block an investigation into PrescribeIT. Even HIV organizations are now calling out the Liberals for politicizing this issue. Let us think about that. The Liberals are so desperate to cover up $300 million in wasted taxpayers’ money that they are using Canadians suffering with HIV as a political shield. My question is simple. Will the Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Health commit today to supporting a full investigation into the PrescribeIT scandal, yes or no?

Dan Mazier, Riding Mountain

Conservative
“Does the government support investigating the 300 million dollars spent on PrescribeIT, yes or no?”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, this is a very simple question. Does the Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Health support investigating the $300 million spent on PrescribeIT, yes or no?

Discussion

No comments yet

See the full discussion

Comment rules

More from sitting 131

  1. Private Members' Business The Criminal Code 6 statements
  2. Government Orders Business of Supply 68 statements
  3. Oral Questions The Economy 12 statements
  4. Oral Questions Canadian Identity and Culture 6 statements
  5. Oral Questions The Economy 14 statements
  6. Oral Questions Health 4 statements
  7. Oral Questions The Economy 10 statements
  8. Oral Questions Youth 2 statements
  9. Oral Questions The Economy 10 statements
  10. Oral Questions Health 8 statements
  11. Oral Questions Public Safety 6 statements
  12. Oral Questions Indigenous Affairs 2 statements
  13. Oral Questions Employment 4 statements
  14. Oral Questions The Economy 2 statements
  15. Government Orders Business of Supply 38 statements
  16. Government Orders Business of Supply 28 statements
  17. Government Orders Main Estimates, 2026-27 106 statements
  18. Government Orders Supplementary Estimates (A), 2026‑27 7 statements
  19. Government Orders Government Orders 5 statements
  20. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  21. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements