Adjournment Proceedings

An adjournment debate on federal funding for PrescribeIT, an electronic prescription system, and a call for an investigation of the roughly $300 million spent on it. Dan Mazier of the Conservatives asked that the health committee investigate the spending and said Liberals were using a study on HIV to avoid it; he pressed the parliamentary secretary to answer yes or no on whether she supported an investigation. Maggie Chi, the Liberal parliamentary secretary, said ending federal funding was planned because provinces and territories were always meant to take it over, noting Quebec had agreed to pay, and said it is the Conservatives who are obstructing the committee by blocking a study of rising HIV rates in Manitoba. Each side accused the other of obstructing the committee’s work, and no direct yes-or-no answer was given.Written by AI from the debate. Updated .

Official text (opens in a new tab)

2 statements

Maggie Chi, Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Health

Liberal
“We ended federal funding for the electronic prescription system because the provinces were always supposed to pay for it once it started. Quebec has already agreed to pay for it, and we hope other provinces will too. Meanwhile, the Conservatives are blocking the health committee from talking about important issues, like the rising HIV rates in Manitoba.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Relevance 19 of 100

    None of this reply addressed the specific point raised or the topic under debate.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, our government did the responsible thing by announcing the end of the federal funding for PrescribeIT because the plan was always for the provinces and territories to pay their own way once we got the system up and running. Since we made that decision, we have already seen the Province of Quebec come to the table and sign an agreement to pay to use PrescribeIT across pharmacies in Quebec. With Quebec on board, we are hopeful that other provinces will soon want to follow suit. For the past month, the Conservatives have been blocking the health committee from discussing issues that matter to Canadians, like the public health emergency that has been declared in that member’s home province of Manitoba because of the sharp rise in HIV infections. It is disgraceful behaviour by the members opposite who have been engaged in this endless obstruction. The member for Kitchener South—Hespeler on the health committee openly stated that he did not believe we could take any actions as parliamentarians to help Manitoba. Well, I am sorry, but when a public emergency has been declared, on this side of the House we are all hands on deck, while the members opposite are busy making clips for their social media.

Maggie Chi, Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Health

Liberal
“The Conservatives are blocking the health committee from studying Manitoba's public health emergency. They are wasting time instead of helping Canadians. I want them to stop and get to work.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Relevance 45 of 100

    None of this reply addressed the specific point raised or the topic under debate.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, once again, the Conservatives would rather obstruct the health committee and block our motion to study the public health emergency in the member’s home province of Manitoba than help Canadians. The member opposite claims we are blocking the work of committee. This is quite rich, considering that a Conservative committee member was filibustering by making a speech about the Magna Carta and described the public health emergency in Manitoba as a facade. Canadians elected our new government to focus on resolving the challenges our country faces. I invite the members opposite to put down their phone, join us and get to work.

Discussion

No comments yet

See the full discussion

Comment rules

More from sitting 131

  1. Private Members' Business The Criminal Code 6 statements
  2. Government Orders Business of Supply 68 statements
  3. Oral Questions The Economy 12 statements
  4. Oral Questions Canadian Identity and Culture 6 statements
  5. Oral Questions The Economy 14 statements
  6. Oral Questions Health 4 statements
  7. Oral Questions The Economy 10 statements
  8. Oral Questions Youth 2 statements
  9. Oral Questions The Economy 10 statements
  10. Oral Questions Health 8 statements
  11. Oral Questions Public Safety 6 statements
  12. Oral Questions Indigenous Affairs 2 statements
  13. Oral Questions Employment 4 statements
  14. Oral Questions The Economy 2 statements
  15. Government Orders Business of Supply 38 statements
  16. Government Orders Business of Supply 28 statements
  17. Government Orders Main Estimates, 2026-27 106 statements
  18. Government Orders Supplementary Estimates (A), 2026‑27 7 statements
  19. Government Orders Government Orders 5 statements
  20. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  21. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements