Adjournment Proceedings

An adjournment debate about environmental protection and enforcement in Alberta, raised by Heather McPherson (NDP). She asked what it would take for the government to enforce environmental laws, respect Indigenous rights, and protect water, citing oil spills, toxic leaks, concerns about coal mines in the Rocky Mountains, and long-standing health worries in Fort Chipewyan. Wade Grant (Liberal) replied that the government works with Indigenous groups, provinces and scientists on oil sands management, that untreated mine wastewater will not be released into the environment, and that it is funding a health study in Fort Chipewyan. McPherson said leaders from the region have been asking for action for decades and wanted real action on water protection. Grant said federal officials remain engaged with provincial regulators and Indigenous communities, would enforce federal laws where they apply, and are working with Indigenous peoples on mine waste management.Written by AI from the debate. Updated .

Official text (opens in a new tab)

2 statements

Heather McPherson, Edmonton Strathcona

NDP
“The government has laws to protect our environment, but it refuses to enforce them. We have seen huge oil spills and toxic water leaks in Alberta, and Indigenous nations have warned about polluted water for years. People are also fighting to keep coal mines from ruining drinking water from the Rocky Mountains. The government already has the legal tools to protect our land and water. I want to know why it refuses to use them.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, on April 17, I asked the Minister of Energy a very simple question: What would it take for the government to protect Canadians, to respect indigenous rights and to actually enforce our environmental laws? The minister told me that Canada has strict standards, independent regulations and a strong safety record, but we have heard this before. None of this matters if the government refuses to enforce the legislation, refuses to enforce the laws that are in place in Canada to protect Canadians, to protect our environment and to ensure that indigenous rights are respected. If we do not enforce that legislation, it does not matter, and the government has shown time and time again that it will not use the tools at its disposal to protect the environment in northern Alberta. In April, Imperial Oil’s pipeline north of Cold Lake released 843,000 litres of bitumen and salt water that contained hydrocarbons, heavy metals, sulphur and other contaminants. That came after the Kearl disaster, when approximately 5.3 million litres of contaminated waste water spilled beyond the mine lease. When Parliament investigated Kearl, Imperial Oil acknowledged that seepage from its tailing system occurs and that the company’s approach is to manage that. It is not to fix it, not to protect communities downstream, not to ensure that the water people are swimming in and drinking and that the animals and wildlife are using is clean, but to contain and manage it. The Athabasca watershed contains enormous volumes of oil sands tailings, and indigenous nations have been raising concerns about contamination and the protection of their water for years. I think about the incredible work that Chief Adam, Chief Tuccaro and Grand Chief Mercredi have done. They have called out the environmental disaster that is happening on their land, yet the government fails to protect the environment in northern Alberta. It is not just limited to the oil sands. I think of the eastern slopes of the Rocky Mountains. Those are the headwaters that provide drinking water to millions of Albertans, yet Albertans have had to repeatedly fight proposals for coal mining in these watersheds. Corb Lund’s “water not coal” campaign helped mobilize hundreds of thousands of Albertans around a single message that our water is more important than corporate profits and more important than coal mining by an Australian company. We are still waiting for the federal government to bring in selenium regulations. We are still waiting for the federal government to use the tools it has at its disposal to protect our water. The government can use the Species at Risk Act, it can use the Impact Assessment Act and it can use the Fisheries Act, yet it chooses time and time again to fail to protect the water and the land in northern Alberta and in our cherished Rocky Mountains. Once again I ask the government this: Why, when Albertans so desperately need the federal government to step up and use the tools at its disposal to protect Albertans, does the government continue to sit on its hands?

Heather McPherson, Edmonton Strathcona

NDP
“Leaders from Fort Chipewyan have asked the government for decades to protect their health. The government only talks instead of taking real action. I want the government to protect the water in northern Alberta and respect Indigenous landowners.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, to be perfectly honest, I am so frustrated listening to that response. It has been decades since the alarm was raised about the health impacts on people living in the Fort Chip area. Every year, Chief Adam and Grand Chief Mercredi come to Ottawa and ask the government to take action. What we get from the government is consultation after consultation and no meaningful action, no meaningful enforcement and no meaningful commitment to making sure that the water in northern Alberta is protected and that the indigenous landowners in that area are being respected.

Discussion

No comments yet

See the full discussion

Comment rules

More from sitting 140

  1. PRIVATE MEMBERS' BUSINESS National Framework on Skilled Trades and Labour Mobility Act 6 statements
  2. Government Orders Commissioner for Modern Treaty Implementation Act 54 statements
  3. Oral Questions Public Safety 2 statements
  4. Oral Questions Canadian Identity and Culture 5 statements
  5. Oral Questions The Economy 6 statements
  6. Oral Questions Taxation 2 statements
  7. Oral Questions Air Transportation 4 statements
  8. Oral Questions The Economy 5 statements
  9. Oral Questions Housing 4 statements
  10. Oral Questions Seniors 2 statements
  11. Oral Questions The Economy 2 statements
  12. Oral Questions International Trade 20 statements
  13. Oral Questions Automotive Industry 5 statements
  14. Oral Questions The Economy 6 statements
  15. Government Orders Commissioner for Modern Treaty Implementation Act 35 statements
  16. Oral Questions The Economy 10 statements
  17. Government Orders Commissioner for Modern Treaty Implementation Act 36 statements
  18. Oral Questions Rail Transportation 2 statements
  19. Oral Questions Small Business 4 statements
  20. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  21. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  22. Oral Questions Labour 2 statements
  23. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements