Business of Supply

A Conservative supply day motion stating that the Liberals have been in power for 11 years and that life in Canada has become unaffordable, asking the government to acknowledge the affordability crisis. Conservative members said constituents cannot afford food, rent, and mortgages, argued government programs leave people dependent rather than self-sufficient, criticized spending and the labelling of expenses as investments, and said the government must admit the problem before fixing it. Liberal members responded by listing government supports, citing money sent to a member’s own riding for groceries and essentials, and saying Conservatives have voted against measures to help children, seniors, and taxpayers.Written by AI from the debate. Updated .

Official text (opens in a new tab)

8 statements

Sandra Cobena, Newmarket—Aurora

Conservative
“I want the House to vote for this motion. It says two simple facts: the Liberals have been in power for 11 years, and life in Canada has become too expensive. People in my riding work hard, but they cannot afford food, rent, and mortgages. The government must admit this crisis exists and fix it.”
  • A repeated line

    “Canada is officially in an affordability crisis.”

    Said 8 times by 7 members since October 8.

    Every time it was said
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I will be sharing my time with the member for Montmorency—Charlevoix. The Liberals have been in power for 11 years. Canadians are living through an affordability crisis and they deserve a government that acknowledges it. Whenever we stand up for Canadians who cannot afford their groceries or rent, the Liberals respond with a laundry list of programs. They tell us how much money they have announced, how many benefits they have created and how many Canadians are receiving this government assistance, but we have to stop and think. When the government will stop measuring success by how many Canadians need government assistance and start measuring it by how many no longer do? Canadians want to get ahead. They want their hard work to mean something. They want to pay their bills and have something left to build a future. In Newmarket—Aurora, I hear from people who work hard and manage their money carefully. They budget, but they still cannot make ends meet. These Canadians are doing their part and asking why, after 11 years, the Liberal government is not doing its part. I take particular pride in hearing from my constituents, not only at the doors, but through their responses to mailers, in emails, phone calls and text messages, and even when they stop me at events. I would like to take a moment to share their stories and concerns here today. Patricia from Newmarket wrote to me and said Canadian salaries do not rise to meet the cost of living. She rarely buys beef and eats as economically as possible. She is already shopping carefully and choosing less food and less expensive food. How much more is she supposed to cut? In the same light, Canadians have told me they pay taxes at every turn. They pay tax when they earn a paycheque, own something, buy something, fill the tank in their car and buy a drink, and they may even pay tax when they die, yet the Liberal government still cannot balance the budget. How much more does the government want from them? They are living within their means and do not understand why the Liberal government cannot live within its means. I have another story that I would like to share. Mary Jane from Newmarket wrote to say she and her family and are struggling with rent costs and the price of food. The most recent statistic is that the bottom quartile of Canadians are spending 110% of their income on just shelter and basic necessities. These Canadians will not be able to get ahead. This short message from Mary Jane tells this House everything it needs to know. This is a family struggling with the costs of shelter and food. These are the basics. They are the things a household needs before it can even think about anything else. That is why our opposition motion today asks this House to recognize exactly what Canadians are living. It is quite simple. It says: (a) the Liberals have been in power for 11 years; and (b) Canada is in an affordability crisis. There are two lines and two simple facts. Members do not have to agree on every policy to acknowledge that Canadians are struggling and that families cannot afford the essentials, but if the Liberal government cannot even acknowledge the problem, how can we expect it to fix it? The government must stop gaslighting Canadians and listen to them instead. These are their cries. There are endless stories of what Canadians are living through, and they must be at the heart of the decisions the Liberal government makes. Joanna from Newmarket wrote to say she and her partner are struggling to stay afloat with their son in university, their mortgage and working overtime. They are both in their late fifties now and these are bad times. Two Canadians are working overtime and struggling to pay their mortgage because they are helping their child through university. Why has it become so difficult to stay afloat? These are people who have spent years working and contributing. They should be able to look ahead with some confidence. Instead, they are working more just to keep up. A line I hear time and time again from Canadians is, “We are the working poor.” When a family works overtime and still cannot get ahead, the Liberal government should be asking some questions. What is making their life so expensive? How can we change that? What costs can we remove? What barriers can we reduce? What can we do to help their paycheques go further? Instead, we get another spending announcement with very little implementation and another laundry list of government programs. Canadians keep making sacrifices. How much more can they really sacrifice when families are already struggling to cover rent and groceries? That is not normal. The Liberal government is asking them to be impressed by more announcements and more spending, but announcements do not pay Joanna’s mortgage, for example. Their talking points do not put groceries in Mary Jane’s kitchen. We should judge the results by what Canadians can actually afford. Can they pay their rent? The answer is no. Can they buy groceries? They are cutting back. Can they save for an emergency? They cannot when the basics take 110% of what they make. Can they finish the month without taking on more debt? No. An MNP report this week confirmed that 44% of Canadians are just $200 away from insolvency. Newmarket Today reported that York region food pantries have seen a rise of 57% since 2020 and that one in three who attend are children. There is a whole generation of children who are now watching their parents not have the dignity to provide for them. That is a failure. Today, every member in this House has an opportunity to acknowledge what Canadians are telling us every day. Recognize that the Liberals have been in power for 11 years and recognize that Canada is in an affordability crisis. Canadians already know it because they are living it. Let us listen to these families. Canadians are doing their part. It is time for the government to do its part so that a hard-earned paycheque can once again pay the bills.

Mark Gerretsen, Kingston and the Islands

Liberal
“The member's motion does nothing to help people. Our government sent over 11 million dollars to help nearly 23,000 people in her riding buy groceries and essentials. She voted against that money. I want her to explain why.”
  • Question or comment in debate

    Signal 35 of 100

    Much of this statement went to praise, blame, greetings, routine procedure or general stories rather than reasons, requests or specific points.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I find it interesting that the member was talking about the government questioning what it can do and how it can support Canadians. In her own riding, over $11 million was sent out to 22,901 recipients for the groceries and essentials benefit. We can talk about a two-line motion that produces nothing, really, other than perhaps some social media opportunities for the Conservatives, or we can talk about something we could vote on that would actually improve the lives of her constituents. When she had the opportunity to support the 22,901 recipients in her riding, she voted against it. Could she explain why?

Sandra Cobena, Newmarket—Aurora

Conservative
“The Liberals want families to rely on government programs for a problem the Liberals caused. Canadians do not want to depend on the government. They want to be able to provide for themselves.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Relevance 45 of 100

    None of this reply addressed the specific point raised or the topic under debate.

    See full analysis
  • Reply to a debate question

    Signal 7 of 100

    Much of this statement went to praise, blame, greetings, routine procedure or general stories rather than reasons, requests or specific points.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I think the member is missing the point. I wish the Liberals would listen. The member, again, is saying to these families they should be happy they have this government program to depend on. He is not saying the government wants them to provide for themselves, it wants their hard work to mean something and it wants them to get back on their own two feet. He and the Liberals are telling them to be happy they depend on the government and to be happy the Liberals are there to fix a problem that they themselves created. Canadians want the dignity to provide for themselves.

Jeremy Patzer, Swift Current—Grasslands—Kindersley

Conservative
“We want the government to admit that life is too expensive for people right now. You cannot fix a problem until you admit it exists. The government has done nothing to make life cheaper. People do not want government cheques. They want their own paycheques to go further.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, one of the things we are trying to do here today is give the government an opportunity to admit that there is an affordability crisis. It is actually pretty simple. We cannot fix something if we are not willing to admit that there is a problem, so we are giving the government a chance to show some humility and understand and admit that there is an affordability problem. The chief whip for the government got up and was talking about this bill that was passed, which is supposedly their big affordability measure, yet the government has actually done nothing to improve affordability for Canadians. Canadians do not want food stamps and cheques from the government. They want the ability for their own cheques to go further. I was wondering whether my colleague shares those same thoughts and concerns.

Sandra Cobena, Newmarket—Aurora

Conservative

Linked statement

“Canadians have real bills to pay and face an affordability crisis. The Prime Minister hides government spending by calling it an investment instead of debt. I want the government to admit that life has become too expensive for Canadians.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Relevance 100 of 100

    Of this reply, 100% addressed the question or point raised.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, yes, I share those thoughts. We are talking about an affordability crisis. The funny thing is that the country is in a massive deficit, but the Prime Minister has changed accounting definitions so that he can take a marker, cross off those expenses and label them as investments. Canadians do not have that luxury. Unfortunately, under the Liberal government, that luxury is reserved for the Liberal government only. Meanwhile, Canadians have real bills to pay and they cannot make them disappear. This is an affordability crisis, and the Liberal government is refusing to recognize that.

Kevin Lamoureux, Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons

Liberal
“This vote is about making life more affordable. For 18 months, Conservatives have voted against help for children, help for seniors, and tax cuts. They say they care about affordability, but they always vote against good programs.”
  • Question or comment in debate

    Clarity 37 of 100

    Much of this statement used imprecise wording, lacked details on timing or responsibility, or made broad claims without support.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I would like to put this as simply as I can. At the end of the day, we have a motion about affordability. Consistently, over the last 18 months, since Canadians went to the polls and elected a new government with a new Prime Minister, we have witnessed Conservative after Conservative stand up and vote against affordability measures to support our children, support our seniors and cut taxes. These are the types of things the Conservatives have been voting against. They talk about affordability, but when it comes down to voting for good programs, they vote no. Why?

Sandra Cobena, Newmarket—Aurora

Conservative
“The Liberals will not admit that life is too expensive for people right now. Canadians do not just want government programs. They want the government to stop overspending and get out of the way so they can provide for themselves.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Relevance 100 of 100

    Of this reply, 100% addressed the question or point raised.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, there have been two questions from the Liberal benches and not once have the Liberals recognized that there is an affordability crisis, which is at the heart of the problem today. The Liberals can get up and list all of the government programs, but what Canadians are saying, which the Liberals refuse to listen to after sharing hundreds of stories from Canadians, is they want to be able to provide for themselves. They want the government to get out of the way and stop the overspending so that they can provide for themselves and get ahead, and the Liberals are refusing to recognize that.

Gabriel Hardy, Montmorency—Charlevoix

Conservative
“Life is too expensive for Canadians right now. Thousands of people have told me they cannot afford rent, gas, and food, even while working full-time. High costs are hurting families and farmers. The House should pass our plan to bring costs down.”
  • A repeated line

    “When the cost of diesel goes up?”

    Said 4 times by 4 members since October 6.

    Every time it was said
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I ran a poll on social media a few months ago, asking people how things were going in their lives. I wanted to find out how they felt about the government’s decisions and I asked them how they were doing, basically. I have received 14,798 responses and 11,000 comments so far. Seven out of 10 comments talk about the cost of living and about how badly they are struggling. Eleven thousand people took the time to tell me about their concerns, their struggles and what they want to change. This is not a scientific survey, but I still think it is important. These are people’s real-life experiences. They shared their personal stories. One of them really stuck with me. A nursing assistant in Charlevoix wrote to me saying that she was at the end of her rope, that she has been working and taking care of others for 38 years. She explained to me that, these days, she can no longer even think about retiring. Her rent, groceries and gas account for three-quarters of her wages. This woman spent her life taking care of others. She has always worked and paid her taxes. She has contributed to our society. All she is asking for now is to be able to retire one day. After 38 years of service, she is not asking for luxuries. She just wants to be able to live, simply to live. Unfortunately, her story is by no means the only one. A couple told me that they have full-time jobs and work very hard, but still have to skip meals some days so that their children can eat. A 22-year-old man wrote that he is working two full-time jobs. He wants to start his own business, but he had to drop out of school because he could not afford to pay rent and go to school at the same time. Think about that. Here is a young person who wants to work, wants to go to school and wants to become an entrepreneur. That is exactly what we need, but today’s economic reality is forcing him to choose between building a future for himself and surviving in the present. The problem is not a lack of ambition; it is a lack of opportunity. These people are not numbers on a spreadsheet. What I am sharing today is facts. These are ordinary people. They are neighbours, parents and young people. We hear the same thing whenever we meet them and everywhere we go, at businesses, on farms, around Montmorency—Charlevoix and across Quebec. They tell us one simple thing: Hard work no longer guarantees success. What we are seeing today is serious. According to Statistics Canada, the consumer price index rose another 3% in August. The Liberals tell us not to worry because the inflation rate itself is falling. Unfortunately, that does not mean that food prices are going down or that people’s income enables them to pay more. When families are already paying too much for groceries, knowing that prices are going up more slowly here than elsewhere in the world does not change the total bill or their ability to pay. Our farmers are also feeling the pinch. When the price of diesel goes up, when machinery gets more expensive and when transportation costs more, farmers are not the only ones who pay. Transporters, processors and, ultimately, Canadian families all pay more. Conservatives are proposing quick, concrete solutions that are within our control, but it seems that supporting families and farmers is not a priority for everyone in the House. I will pause there.

Discussion

No comments yet

See the full discussion

Comment rules

More from sitting 148

  1. Government Orders Business of Supply 105 statements
  2. Government Orders Business of Supply 8 statements
  3. Statements by Members Latin American and Hispanic Day on the Hill 2 statements
  4. Oral Questions Finance 5 statements
  5. Oral Questions The Economy 8 statements
  6. Oral Questions Government Priorities 6 statements
  7. Oral Questions Public Services and Procurement 13 statements
  8. Oral Questions Climate Change 4 statements
  9. Oral Questions Housing 4 statements
  10. Oral Questions Employment 4 statements
  11. Oral Questions Housing 2 statements
  12. Oral Questions Agriculture and Agri-Food 2 statements
  13. Oral Questions Public Safety 4 statements
  14. Oral Questions Democratic Institutions 8 statements
  15. Oral Questions Fisheries and Oceans 6 statements
  16. Oral Questions Health 2 statements
  17. Oral Questions The Economy 6 statements
  18. Oral Questions The Environment 2 statements
  19. Oral Questions Justice 2 statements
  20. Oral Questions Health 2 statements
  21. Oral Questions Fisheries and Oceans 4 statements
  22. Oral Questions The Economy 2 statements
  23. Government Orders Business of the House 2 statements
  24. Government Orders Business of Supply 9 statements
  25. Private Members' Business Sergei Magnitsky International Anti-Corruption and Human Rights Act 15 statements
  26. Government Orders Business of Supply 8 statements
  27. Government Orders Business of Supply 42 statements
  28. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  29. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  30. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 6 statements