Business of Supply

The House debated an opposition supply-day motion on the cost of living, which asked members to recognize that government policies are contributing to affordability problems. Conservatives said that after eleven years of Liberal government, taxes and regulations such as the industrial carbon price, clean fuel rules and the plastics packaging rules have raised costs for energy, shipping and food, hitting seniors, rural residents, low-income people and people with disabilities hardest, and they called on the government to admit this and support the motion. Liberals responded that affordability is a global problem linked to international instability, and pointed to their own measures including lower income taxes, dental care, the grocery benefit, a fuel tax holiday, homebuyer tax cuts and billions for affordable housing, saying the Conservatives have opposed these steps and that the motion offers no solutions. Bloc Québécois members asked whether climate-related disaster costs should be counted in addressing affordability, and raised the government’s handling of the natural health products sector. Some members also discussed seniors’ supports, disability benefits, and housing programs such as Build Canada Homes.Written by AI from the debate. Updated .

Official text (opens in a new tab)

3 statements

Gord Johns, Courtenay—Alberni

NDP
“People with disabilities need more money to live. The federal disability benefit is too small, and applying for it is too hard. The federal government should automatically accept people who already have provincial disability status instead of making them prove it twice.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, nobody is feeling the cost of living crisis more than people on fixed incomes, namely seniors and people living on disability. I will talk about people living on disability. They are getting a meagre $200 disability benefit from Canada, which is not a lot of money in today’s world. We have long called for a universal basic income, starting with people living with disabilities and seniors. To get the disability benefit, one needs to get the disability tax credit form approved. Good luck doing that. It also takes away a million patient visits a year from doctors. My question is about a proposal that we have put forward. If someone is living with a disability in a province or territory, why would the federal government not acknowledge that instead of making people in a province or territory prove that they have a disability again?

Gord Johns, Courtenay—Alberni

NDP
“The disability benefit of $200 a month is too small. People with disabilities need enough income to live above the poverty line. We should also cut the red tape. People should not have to see a doctor twice to prove their disability. If their province already says they have a disability, they should qualify automatically.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I am going to try this again. We know that the people feeling the cost of living crisis more than anyone are those on fixed incomes, such as people living with disabilities. I spoke to my colleague earlier about this. Right now, the disability benefit is a meagre $200 a month. I believe that people living with a disability should be getting a universal basic income so they are living above the poverty line. Instead, they need to apply for the disability tax credit to access the disability benefit. They have to get a health professional to approve it. It consumes about 250,000 patient visits a year for doctors, and a bunch of CRA time. Does my colleague agree to get rid of this red tape and make it easier for people living with disabilities? The government should not make people prove twice that they have a disability in their home province or territory. If it has already been deemed that they have a disability, they should automatically qualify.

Gord Johns, Courtenay—Alberni

NDP
“The Liberals have run the government for 11 years, but homelessness is still growing. About 65,000 people are homeless every night, and we do not have enough affordable housing. The government still has no plan to fix this. I want to know when they will make ending homelessness a top priority.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I have a lot of respect for my colleague. However, the Liberals have been in government for 11 years. There are 65,000 people who are homeless on any given night across this country. In 11 years in government, they have yet to present a plan on how they are going to address homelessness, and it is growing. We are at 3.3% non-market housing. The Liberals talk about their major projects list. When is ending homelessness going to make it to the major projects list?

Discussion

No comments yet

See the full discussion

Comment rules

More from sitting 148

  1. Government Orders Business of Supply 105 statements
  2. Government Orders Business of Supply 8 statements
  3. Statements by Members Latin American and Hispanic Day on the Hill 2 statements
  4. Oral Questions Finance 5 statements
  5. Oral Questions The Economy 8 statements
  6. Oral Questions Government Priorities 6 statements
  7. Oral Questions Public Services and Procurement 13 statements
  8. Oral Questions Climate Change 4 statements
  9. Oral Questions Housing 4 statements
  10. Oral Questions Employment 4 statements
  11. Oral Questions Housing 2 statements
  12. Oral Questions Agriculture and Agri-Food 2 statements
  13. Oral Questions Public Safety 4 statements
  14. Oral Questions Democratic Institutions 8 statements
  15. Oral Questions Fisheries and Oceans 6 statements
  16. Oral Questions Health 2 statements
  17. Oral Questions The Economy 6 statements
  18. Oral Questions The Environment 2 statements
  19. Oral Questions Justice 2 statements
  20. Oral Questions Health 2 statements
  21. Oral Questions Fisheries and Oceans 4 statements
  22. Oral Questions The Economy 2 statements
  23. Government Orders Business of the House 2 statements
  24. Government Orders Business of Supply 9 statements
  25. Private Members' Business Sergei Magnitsky International Anti-Corruption and Human Rights Act 15 statements
  26. Government Orders Business of Supply 8 statements
  27. Government Orders Business of Supply 42 statements
  28. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  29. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  30. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 6 statements