“Life is expensive right now, but our government is already helping Canadians with the cost of living. We lowered income taxes on the lowest bracket and expanded dental care. We boosted the benefit that helps families pay for groceries, gave drivers a break on fuel taxes, and cut taxes for first-time homebuyers. We are also spending billions to build more affordable homes and better local infrastructure.”

“Mr. Speaker, I will be sharing my time with my colleague from Kings—Hants. I think we can all recognize the importance of the issue raised by the motion before us today. Canadians are living through a period of economic uncertainty marked by global instability and the rising cost of living. In this context, our government is focusing on what it can control: building a strong Canadian economy, developing our infrastructure, diversifying our trade partners, ensuring responsible financial management and supporting Canadians who are feeling the pressures of everyday expenses. In Thérèse‑De Blainville, affordability comes down to a very simple question. What is left over in a family’s budget once groceries, transportation, health care and housing are paid for? That is what families, seniors and young people have been talking to me about. Across the country, people are worried about the cost of essentials. In Thérèse-De Blainville, I regularly meet with the outstanding leaders of a wide range of organizations who talk to me about this issue and also propose solutions. I share these practical solutions with our ministers and our Prime Minister to draw inspiration from them. That is why our government understands these concerns and is taking meaningful and responsible measures to ease the burden on households while maintaining economic stability for the long term. Since 2025, we have done many things to respond to these realities. We reduced the federal tax rate on the first income bracket and expanded access to the Canadian dental care plan for eligible adults aged 18 to 64. This year, we also increased the Canada groceries and essentials benefit. This new benefit, which replaces the GST credit, provides more generous support to more than 12 million Canadians. Since July 2026, benefits have been increased by 25% for a period of five years. In addition, eligible Canadians received a one-time top-up payment in June. For an eligible family with two adults and two children, with a net income of $40,000, the increase and the top-up amount to $805 in additional support. This measure was actually announced in my riding at La Moisson health food store in Sainte-Thérèse. In total, including the one-time top-up, a family of four can receive up to $1,890 for this benefit year, while a single person can receive up to $950. We have also provided temporary relief from the federal excise tax on gas and diesel to support Canadians facing rising transportation costs. We are also investing in our communities. In Thérèse-De Blainville, our investments in projects like Manoir Blainville II are helping to directly address housing needs. This project will provide 70 social and affordable housing units for independent seniors in Blainville. These are concrete investments that will increase the housing supply in our community. I speak regularly with the five mayors in my riding and surrounding areas to identify new sites and opportunities for affordable housing and new multi-generational housing concepts. I look forward to continuing these discussions with our new MNAs on this matter. By working together, we can act more quickly to find solutions with our constituents. Now, I would like to focus on housing affordability, which remains a challenge for many Canadians, especially those looking to buy their first home. Thanks to our government’s industrial strategies, economic development is and will be strong in our Lower Laurentians region. Business leaders are stressing the need for access to local labour. This means increasing the housing supply. That is also why it is important for our government in Thérèse-De Blainville and the Lower Laurentians to quickly make housing more affordable for renters, buyers and homeowners who are paying down a mortgage. That is why we launched the Build Canada Homes program to accelerate the construction of affordable housing at scale across the country. That is also why we are investing in the infrastructure needed to build homes and in measures to lower development charges. We are also ushering in tax changes to make new homes more affordable. Last May, we eliminated the GST on eligible newly built homes valued at up to $1 million for eligible first-time homebuyers. This measure can save homebuyers up to $50,000 on the purchase of a new home. The rebate is gradually phased out for homes valued between $1 million and $1.5 million. For example, a home that costs $1.25 million could qualify for 50% of the maximum rebate, meaning a savings of up to $25,000. This measure is expected to save Canadians $3.9 billion in taxes over the first five years, helping to lower the upfront cost of purchasing a home while encouraging the construction of new homes. To be eligible, first-time homebuyers must meet a number of criteria. For example, they must be Canadian citizens or permanent residents, be at least 18 years old and not have lived, during the current calendar year or any of the previous four calendar years, in a home owned by themselves, their spouse or their common-law partner. In addition, we have extended the repayment grace period under the home buyers’ plan from two years to five years for those making their first withdrawal. This gives new homeowners more time to manage the significant expenses that arise during the first few years of home ownership. I would like to return to Build Canada Homes, which was launched in September 2025 to boost housing supply across the country, with a particular focus on affordable housing. It is designed to accelerate the construction of primarily affordable and off-market housing across Canada by bringing together four essential components: public land, flexible financing, expertise in property development and innovative construction methods. While I am on the topic of innovative construction, I want to take this opportunity to highlight the innovation of the company Isothermic in Bois‑des‑Filion, in my riding. This company understands that affordability and energy needs are two important issues in our society. This company is innovating and creating buildings that are more energy efficient, able to withstand wind and water and able to resist the climate of tomorrow. Since its launch, Build Canada Homes has advanced six direct housing development projects and established significant partnerships with provinces, territories, municipalities and indigenous partners. These efforts represent more than 11,000 new homes that are currently being built or are scheduled to be built soon. In addition, there is the build communities strong fund, our government’s key infrastructure program. This fund provides $51 billion over 10 years, including $3 billion a year in ongoing funding to build and renew infrastructure. After talking with the mayors in my region, I am also identifying opportunities through this fund to improve sports and cultural infrastructure. Being able to access and participate in culture and sports activities contributes to the quality of life of Canadians and to their physical and mental health and relational well-being. A significant portion of these investments will be used to increase the housing supply and make housing more affordable in our region and across Canada. For example, the investments announced this year in Iqaluit are expected to support the construction of 2,000 to 2,500 housing units by 2031. In Headingley, Manitoba, investments are expected to support the construction of an additional 1,771 housing units. The expansion of water infrastructure in Quispamsis, New Brunswick, will make it possible to build 1,055 new housing units. Other drinking water and waste water treatment infrastructure projects will support residential development projects in Cornwall, Prince Edward Island, and Halifax and Bridgewater, Nova Scotia. Affordability is not an abstract concept. For the people of Thérèse-De Blainville, it means the ability to cover their basic expenses with a little leftover at the end of the month. The measures that I presented—including the groceries and essentials benefit, tax relief, dental care, access to sports and cultural infrastructure, help with transportation costs and investments in affordable housing—help alleviate pressures on household budgets. These measures do not make all of the problems go away, but they do provide real assistance with several major expenses in the family budget, while also helping to address the more long-term challenge of housing supply. Canadians expect their government to respond to the rising cost of living with tangible solutions. That is exactly what we are doing. Our approach combines immediate assistance, targeted support for those who need it most, an increase in the housing supply, investments in our communities, and responsible management of public finances. As Canada continues to build a stronger, more resilient and more self-reliant economy, we are taking steps to bring costs down today while investing in our long-term prosperity. Affordability requires consistency and responsible choices.”

• Echo ×5

  A repeated line

  “Our government is focusing on what it can control.”

  Said 5 times by 5 members since May 26.

  Every time it was said →

“Our housing plan is working across the country, including 70 projects in my riding. We are also helping the construction industry build greener, cheaper homes.”

“Mr. Speaker, I must admit that I am surprised by the question because in my speech, I presented all the projects currently on the table. I am very proud that we already have 70 of them in my riding, and there is affordable housing throughout Canada. We are working to drive innovation in the construction sector to make it more environmentally friendly and more affordable. We have achieved concrete results in every region of Canada.”

• Answered
  ?

  Reply to a debate question

  Relevance 100 of 100

  Of this reply, 100% addressed the question or point raised.

  See full analysis →

“MPs need to talk to their local mayors to find land and opportunities for affordable housing. They should work with our housing program so we can build homes faster.”

“Mr. Speaker, I want to point out to my colleague that it is up to regional MPs to reach out to local mayors to talk about Build Canada Homes and learn about opportunities to secure affordable housing and land in the region. These members need to work with us to round out the information on Build Canada Homes and accelerate project implementation. It is up to members to do the work on the ground and put our regions in contact with Build Canada Homes.”

• Didn't answer
  ?

  Reply to a debate question

  Relevance 46 of 100

  None of this reply addressed the specific point raised or the topic under debate.

  See full analysis →

“I want my colleague to tell the House again how the government's work has helped Canada since the election.”

“Mr. Speaker, my colleague gave a great speech. She did an outstanding job of laying out all of our government’s commitments. I would like her to explain to the House again how all of the commitments we have made since our election have steered Canada in the right direction.”

“People and groups I meet with say they see our projects being built. They say our government works well with them and they are happy with our progress.”

“Mr. Speaker, I meet with a lot of organizational representatives and individuals. They talk to me about the impact they are seeing on the ground. They see projects taking root and getting built. They also see that we in government have the wherewithal to work effectively with them and with all stakeholders to help find solutions and implement the right programs. To conclude, I would like to say that they all tell me how happy they are with Prime Minister Carney and our cabinet right now when it comes to making progress.”

• Didn't answer
  ?

  Reply to a debate question

  Relevance 46 of 100

  None of this reply addressed the specific point raised or the topic under debate.

  See full analysis →

“Seniors are struggling with the cost of living, and they deserve affordable housing. I want to work with other members to help them.”

“Mr. Speaker, I thank my opposition colleague for raising the issue of seniors. We talk to seniors every week because we know that many of them are struggling with the cost of living. We need to find solutions to give them the support they need to get through these tough times. After a lifetime of contributing to our society, they are entitled to affordable housing. I am happy to work with my colleagues to find solutions.”

• Didn't answer
  ?

  Reply to a debate question

  Relevance 47 of 100

  None of this reply addressed the specific point raised or the topic under debate.

  See full analysis →

“I am voting against the Conservative motion. Things do cost a lot right now, but their motion does not offer any real solutions. It also ignores the work our government has done to help, like cheaper child care, school food programs, and money to help people heat their homes.”

“Mr. Speaker, we are here today to debate the Conservative opposition day motion. I thoroughly enjoy opposition day motions. They are an opportunity for the government to prod ideas from the opposition benches. The text is quite simple today. It is, frankly, just two pieces. The first part is that the House recognize that the Liberal government has been in government for 11 years. We are happy to recognize that and talk about the accomplishments of successive Liberal governments. The second part is that we are in an affordability crisis. There lies a trap in how the Conservative Party has presented today’s opposition day motion. It is undeniable that the Liberal Party has been in government for 11 years, and I am happy to talk about the accomplishments and the work that I am proud of, having been involved for seven years as a parliamentarian. The truth is that we recognize as a government, and we have highlighted this, that there is an affordability challenge across the country. Reasonable members of Parliament could stand here and debate what the definition of an affordability crisis is. I recognize and this government has recognized that there are challenges across the country and that we ought to do something about them, but what is missing from today’s Conservative opposition day motion is what to do about them and what measures the Conservative Party would put forward to support affordability. That is completely lacking in today’s opposition day motion. I would suggest that the opposition day motion is also lacking any recognition of the initiatives by this government, and by extension this House, because there have been examples where members of Parliament across the aisle have been supportive of government initiatives to improve affordability. There is no mention of that whatsoever. That is why we will be voting against today’s opposition day motion. It is not because we do not recognize that there are affordability challenges or we do not think there is something to be done about them, but the text of the motion, with the way it was drafted by the Conservative side, fails to recognize the initiatives that this House has taken forward. It leaves open what the definition of an affordability crisis could be and proposes zero measures to address it for Canadians. Opposition day motions are a great opportunity for the opposition to put concrete policy forward and what it would look like. Today is a bit of a failure in leadership in that domain. We will not have the opportunity to debate policy that the Conservatives would implement if they were on this side of the bench, but that is okay. My remaining time gives me the opportunity to opine on two areas. One is that the motion talks about 11 years of Liberal government. I have been a member of Parliament since 2019. I would like to use my remaining time to talk about some of the initiatives that I am proud to have been a part of and some of the work I have done individually as a parliamentarian. I am also proud of being part of a government that has introduced measures that matter not only to the good people of Kings—Hants, but to Canadians across this country. I am going to start with a really important announcement. Today, the Prime Minister announced a $2-billion program for heat pumps. This program is going to support 800,000 homes across the country. It is going to allow up to a $10,000 grant for homeowners below the provincial median income. Of course, that will differ whether it is Nova Scotia, Manitoba, Ontario or British Columbia, but anyone below the provincial median income will be eligible for a $10,000 grant to put a heat pump in their home. This is smart public policy. This program can reduce the cost of someone’s energy bill. It is also, of course, an environmental measure, particularly in areas and jurisdictions where the electrical grid is much more affordable than using other forms of energy. This also allows for a $2,000 grant for anyone who is above the provincial median income. I see a lot of similarities between the work that was done by the Atlantic caucus in the last Parliament and the announcement today. I represent a number of people, some of whom may be on a fixed income and may not have the means to do some of the renovations that might be needed and that could save money long-term because they do not have the ability to get over the hump of having money up front to pay for some of the expenditures. One of the things I am proudest of as a parliamentarian was advocating for a $500-million fund that we worked on with the Atlantic provinces to help roll out a similar type of program. It was successful. I have dozens of examples. There are many more than that, but I am talking about dozens of people who have come to me personally and said that this intervention saved them on their home energy bill. Obviously, it is a smart environmental choice, but more importantly, it is an affordability measure. It was quite remarkable to hear the Conservative Party attacking this idea. We want to put something in front of Canadians around affordability. Here is something important. We can produce heat pumps here in Canada. There are, for example, heat pump producers, independently, in my own constituency in Nova Scotia. They exist across the country. This is good public policy, and it is an example of something I am proud of today. I am proud of the national school food program. We have a lot of constituents who were strong advocates of this. Many across the country advocated to say that we needed a program that could ensure that children who need this support in school have access to a healthy school food program. They said we should try to source the ingredients locally. Because of the action of many members of Parliament, the support in the last Parliament and ultimately the Liberal government, that policy is here today. Again, we hear questions on it from the opposition benches. In fact, the leader of the official opposition calls this bureaucracy. I would invite the leader of the official opposition to come to Kings—Hants, where we see this program rolling out and benefiting children in schools today. It is quite remarkable that the leader calls that bureaucracy. I call it action. I call it making a difference on the ground. It is guided and informed by many people across the country who advocated to parliamentarians across the political spectrum to move in this direction. As for national child care, we talked about this for 50 years in this country. This is something the Liberal government has introduced. The program is working across the country. There have been growing pains, but I think we need to recognize that there is a desire to have additional space. The government just recently announced a $5-billion augmentation to support the provinces in the continued expansion of child care access across the country. Right now, in Nova Scotia, we are on target for $12 a day on average. This additional money will hopefully and presumably be able to get us closer to that mark. Whether or not it gets exactly to $10, it has demonstrably moved the needle on affordability, access to early education, and the infrastructure that is needed to support our communities. How about agriculture? I am up on my feet often talking about this. I am very proud to represent a constituency in Atlantic Canada that is the heart of agriculture. I am very proud of our 2025 platform. This platform had serious measures to support farmers, whether it was the AgriStability increases or the money for AgriMarketing. A pledge to have $200 million in an agri-food processing fund was realized by the current Minister of Agriculture under the national food security strategy. We are seeing those investments roll out in real time. The Conservatives will sometimes talk about the idea that these announcements are not resulting in concrete action. I can tell members that they absolutely are. I am proud of the work that we have done around the increases to AgriStability, something that the Conservative Party under Mr. Harper cut. We have actually increased it over the time. There are a lot of very good measures in the recently introduced Bill S-7. It is starting in the Senate, and it will work its way to the House. It is about reducing red tape in agriculture and has amendments to the Fertilizers Act, amendments to the Seeds Act and amendments to the Feeds Act. Anyone who knows agriculture well will know that a whole host of work had to be done. It did not happen in the last government, I am afraid to say, but I am very proud to see that some of the work I did as the minister of agriculture just before the last election has been continued by the current Minister of Agriculture, the hon. member for Malpeque. There is some really good stuff there. I am proud of the work I have done to advocate for the resolution at the Avon River. This was an issue where the constituency and individuals in the Windsor and Falmouth area were not happy with successive decisions from the Department of Fisheries and Oceans and the ministers therein. I have worked with the current Minister of Fisheries to resolve that issue in a way that balances fish passage with ensuring that the community perspective and indigenous rights are respected. I am proud of the rural transit fund. This is something I helped advocate for, along with our colleagues, so we could have a fund to help support smaller communities that did not have access to regular funding. I am proud of the fact that we have increased the volunteer tax credit for firefighters from $3,000 to $6,000, and allowed funding that goes to municipalities to support fire hall infrastructure. Lastly, I am proud of the work we have done to create a facility for The Flower Cart Group and CCOA, two really important organizations in my constituency.”

“We know life is expensive right now, and our government is taking action to help. The Conservatives ran on a plan that had nothing to help farmers. They also vote against helpful programs, like the one that feeds kids in school using food from local farms.”

“Mr. Speaker, I certainly reject the way the member is framing this. I thought I was pretty clear in my remarks, and I think we are pretty clear-eyed that there are challenges across the country. That is part of the reason we are putting initiatives forward, some of which the member has supported. The member’s predecessor in the last Parliament was a very thoughtful member when it came to agriculture. I believe the member has a lot of farmers in his constituency. I hope he is a bit disappointed that he ran on a platform in 2025 from the Conservative Party that had absolutely nothing for farmers. There was no mention of AgriStability and no mention of AgriMarketing. The party that he sits with consistently votes against the initiatives that matter for the things that he just talked about, including affordability and feeding kids in school. I do not know why he would be against a program that feeds kids in school and uses local product, including maybe from his own farmers.”

“Climate change is a real problem. That is why our government made a deal with Quebec and Newfoundland and Labrador to build clean power at Churchill Falls. It can power Montreal, Toronto, and Vancouver. It is the biggest clean energy project in North American history, and my colleague should support it.”

“Mr. Speaker, the consequences of the climate crisis are real. That is exactly why our government worked with the governments of Quebec and Newfoundland and Labrador to reach an agreement on the development of Churchill Falls. The clean electricity generated by this project is enough to power Montreal, Toronto and Vancouver. This is the largest investment in clean energy in the history of North America. I hope my hon. colleague recognizes that this investment and this work are absolutely crucial for Quebec, for Canada and for the world.”

“Can the member repeat the benefits of the heat pump project he mentioned today?”

“Mr. Speaker, I am very happy to ask a question of my colleague from Kings—Hants. He referred to a big announcement today about heat pumps. Can he repeat to me what the benefits are of the great project he referred to?”

“The government announced a program to help 800,000 homes buy heat pumps. Lower-income families can get up to $10,000, and other families can get $2,000. This will support Canadian manufacturing and lower energy bills for people who need the help.”

“Mr. Speaker, I will with pleasure. My hon. colleague is someone with a lot of experience in the economy and someone who worked at the OECD prior to joining politics. In fact, she was our ambassador and proudly served Canada. Today’s announcement by the Prime Minister was about trying to support 800,000 homes across the country. It will allow anyone who is below the provincial median income to be eligible for up to a $10,000 grant to install a heat pump. Anyone who is above the provincial median income will be eligible for a $2,000 grant. This is investment in Canada. It will support manufacturing at home, but it will also lower energy bills for beneficiaries. I think of a lot of my own constituents who do not have the ability to make this happen. We have seen it happen in the Atlantic. This is a great national program that I know will make a difference in the members’ riding, in my riding and indeed across the country.”

“I want the member to name one thing the government has done in the last 18 months that she likes. For example, our $5-billion fund for health buildings could help reopen a hospital emergency room in my riding. Is there anything in the budget she supports?”

“Mr. Speaker, I have a fairly straightforward question for my friend across the way in regard to what the government has actually accomplished over the last 18 months. I will give an example. Is there anything from the last 18 months that the member opposite likes? For example, personally, I like the health infrastructure fund. It is a $5-billion program over three years. For me, it gives hope to the residents I represent in Winnipeg North that we will be able to get the Seven Oaks General Hospital emergency department restored, or that it will at least put pressure on the provincial government. Is there anything within the budget that the member likes?”

• Off topic
  ?

  Question or comment in debate

  Relevance 0 of 100

  None of this question addressed the preceding speech or the topic under debate.

  See full analysis →

“Canadians elected our government less than 18 months ago, and helping people afford life has been our priority from day one. We have taken many steps to make life cheaper, but the Conservatives keep voting against them. They talk about affordability, but they oppose our actions.”

“Mr. Speaker, less than 18 months ago, Canadians went to the polls and chose a new Prime Minister and a new government. There are 70-plus new Liberal MPs sitting in the government benches today. Virtually from day one, the Prime Minister has been talking about the issue of affordability, along with building a stronger and healthier Canadian economy and society. We have taken many measures. I have had a chance to list off many of the different affordability measures the government has actually taken, yet the Conservative Party continuously votes against them. On the one hand, the Conservatives talk about doing something for affordability, but when we do, they vote against it. Why?”

“I am against this motion because it offers no real ideas or solutions. It is true that Liberals have governed for 11 years, and it is true that people are struggling with high prices. But high prices are happening all over the world because of global wars, not because of our government. We are already helping Canadians by cutting taxes, paying for dental care and child care, and giving families money for food and housing.”

“Mr. Speaker, I would like to point out that I will be sharing my speaking time with the member for Cape Breton—Canso—Antigonish. I often say what an honour it is to rise in the House to debate a motion. I actually cannot say that today, because this is one of the most nonsensical motions I have ever seen before the House of Commons. Normally, when we propose a motion, we have a solution; we have a proposal. We say, “This is my idea. I would like the House of Commons to debate it.” Today, there are zero ideas in this motion. It makes two statements, both of which are actually true, but have no causal link to each other, necessarily. The first statement we are debating is that the Liberals have been in power for 11 years. Well, yes, that is a true statement. I know that because I was first elected 11 years ago, and I have always sat on this side of the House, and my Conservative colleagues who proposed the motion have always sat on that side of the House. This is because Canadians, for four consecutive elections, have chosen a Liberal government. Let me read the results of those elections. In 2015, there were 184 Liberals elected to 99 Conservatives. In 2019, there were 157 Liberals elected to 121 Conservatives. In 2021, there were 160 Liberals elected to 119 Conservatives. In the 2025 election, with our new Prime Minister and our new government, we had 169 Liberals elected to 144 Conservatives. We all know what has happened since that election. We have had many members of the Conservative Party cross the floor to become Liberals. The Liberal Party has won six consecutive by-elections to have new Liberal members. Today, we are at 173 Liberal members, plus there are six vacancies. It is true. Canadians from across the country—from Quebec, Ontario, the Atlantic provinces, British Columbia and even Manitoba, Alberta and Saskatchewan—elected Liberal MPs in the last election, and we now have a majority government. It is true. Will debating this motion actually achieve anything for Canadians? The answer is no, but if that is what the Conservatives want to talk about, then sure. The second statement is that Canada is in an affordability crisis. Well, sure, there is an affordability crisis in western democracies. There is an affordability crisis across the world because there are wars going on in Russia and Ukraine. There is a war going on constantly around Iran, and that has led to the rise in prices of things like fuel and wheat and other things, which has caused inflation to go up across the western world, and food in particular has been affected. Canada actually, as a country, has one of the lower inflation rates in the G7. Since the pandemic, inflation has been rampant, and Canadians are suffering as a result, just like Americans are suffering, British people are suffering and people are suffering in many other countries. They are suffering because they have to worry about how they are going to afford to pay their grocery bills. This is why this government has put forward numerous initiatives to try to deal with that question. Somehow, in some way, the Conservatives today have tried to argue that inflation and affordability are issues only in Canada, which is certainly not the case. They are an issue everywhere, whether the government is a right-wing government or a left-wing government or a centrist government. This government has actually dealt with the problem. We have put forward, in the last year and a half, numerous solutions that I can detail. Let us talk about the Canada groceries and essentials benefit, which will increase support for Canadian families by 25% over five years starting in July. In fact, the latest payment happened just a few days ago, which will allow Canadians to have more money to put towards their groceries and essentials. There is the first act that this government did, which was cutting taxes for 22 million Canadians by lowering the first marginal tax rate from 15% to 14%. It provided tax relief of $420 in the first half of the year. This year, it will be $840 a year for two-income families. This is a meaningful act to put more money in Canadians’ pockets. We are eliminating the GST for first-time homebuyers and cancelling the federal consumer carbon tax, effective April 1, 2025, which was an idea the Conservatives supported. I know it is disappointing to be sitting in opposition for 11 years. I understand the frustration. However, the Conservatives themselves chose to make mention of that in the motion. It was not me who chose to talk about the fact that the Liberals have been in power and have been chosen by Canadians over and over again. It was them, so maybe they should celebrate that. Then there is the national school food program, We made that permanent, but the Conservatives voted against that. That program lets kids get food at school. It allows families to know their children are able to have a warm, good lunch at school. There are automatic federal benefits, where people who are lower income are automatically receiving benefits they qualify for. There are lowering costs and strengthening competition in essential services, pro-competition measures in the telecom sector and the financial sector to reduce prices. As well, there is the expanding and entrenching of the Canada child benefit. The Canada child benefit is something that millions of Canadians benefit from and is putting much more money into the pockets of parents of children until the age of 17. There is the lowering costs for child care and kid essentials. Lowering the cost of child care across this country, creating more spots and making sure that day care is affordable has not only allowed women to go back in the workforce in many places to make sure we have a much more equal workforce, but also allowed families to know they do not have to pay extraordinary amounts to do that. I am very proud that our province of Quebec was the first place in Canada, and perhaps one of the first in the world, to have affordable child care. Let us talk about the Canada dental plan. For way too long in this country, Canadians have been able to get medical care, but not dental care. This means people know their bodies are healthy, except for their teeth and gums, but the teeth and gums are some of the most vital parts of the body that can bring infection to someone’s entire body. For some reason, in Canada, we had never guaranteed that lower-income people would be able to pay for their dentist. These types of preventive measures are necessary to keep people healthy. If a person’s family income is $90,000 or less per year, they are able to qualify for dental care if they do not have other insurance provided by their employer. That is huge. There is the $500 Canada housing benefit top-up and the tax-free first home savings account that over 750,000 Canadians enrolled in. As well, there is the Canada disability benefit, where our government is delivering up to $200 a month, which is helping 600,000 Canadians. I can go on and on and on about all the affordability measures we are taking. Yes, Canadians are hurting. Yes, affordability is a huge issue. It is one of the most important issues facing this country, and we need to do everything we can to make sure that Canadians can afford to live their lives, buy their groceries, have housing and have the most important essentials. This motion today, as I return to it, proposes nothing. There is not one idea in the motion, not one. There is not a single idea in the motion. It merely makes two statements. There are no proposals. If they can waste time debating this in the House of Commons simply to acknowledge two facts and propose nothing, I fail to even see the purpose of the House of Commons. The House of Commons, the Parliament of Canada, is here to listen to ideas, propose ideas and debate those ideas, not to simply put two different facts together that have no causality one to the other and say that it is a motion.”

• Echo ×6

  A repeated line

  “Is it the national school food program?”

  Said 6 times by 4 members since April 23.

  Every time it was said →

“High costs are a real problem in many countries, and our government is working to fix them. The opposition's motion offers no real solutions.”

“Mr. Speaker, it must be very sad to be sitting in the opposition and have nothing as a solution to propose for affordability and to create a motion that basically does not propose anything at all. Affordability is a very important issue. Affordability is a problem throughout western democracies. Affordability needs to be tackled. This government is tackling it, and the opposition has zero solutions to propose in today’s motion.”

“Helping seniors and lowering costs are important. Our government lowered the retirement age back to 65 after the Conservatives raised it. I know seniors face real challenges, and I am open to hearing the member's arguments on this bill.”

“Mr. Speaker, affordability is very important. Seniors’ issues are also very important. We want all seniors to be able to live with dignity. That is why, in 2015, our government reversed the Conservatives’ decision to raise the retirement age from 65 to 67. Discussions will be held on this private member’s bill. I recognize that there are real challenges facing seniors aged 75 and over. In addition, many seniors aged 65 to 75 continue to work. That said, I am certainly always open to hear my colleague’s arguments.”

“Ending homelessness is very important, but this motion does nothing to fix it. We should be debating real solutions for affordable housing instead. I am happy to talk with the member about homelessness.”

“Mr. Speaker, on whether the projects list would include ending homelessness, I am not quite sure that is what the project list works for. However, ending homelessness is a very important issue. Making sure that people have a roof over their head is incredibly important. Whatever government programs deal with that and continue to deal with that certainly are priorities for all of us in this House. I have a lot of respect for my colleague, and I am sure he would have preferred that, in the motion before us, there was a solution to the homelessness crisis. A motion could have proposed to debate how we could make housing more affordable versus the nothing motion that was put forward today. I am happy to talk to the member about the homelessness issue.”

“Prices are high because of foreign wars and trade fights with the United States. We can only control what happens here. We voted today to move big projects forward. I want the member to explain how these big projects will create jobs and help Canadians.”

“Mr. Speaker, everybody knows that prices are high because of the war in Iran and the trade war we have with the U.S. We are going to control what we can control. We voted today on Bill C-39, which would advance major projects. I would like the member to explain to us how getting major projects done in Canada is going to work in a great way and get Canadians to work.”

“Our government works well with the provinces to build big projects that help sell our resources. We need to sell our oil to countries across the Pacific, not just to the United States.”

“Mr. Speaker, that is a wonderful question. To me, one of the things that is most important about this government is making Canada work and working with the provinces. We will see provincial premiers saluting the government and the Prime Minister. They say what a pleasure it is to work together to create projects that will have a national scale and that will allow us to bring things to market that we otherwise would not have been able to bring. We also need to diversify our trade. We need to make sure we have a way to get our oil to the Asia-Pacific region and not just leave it here in North America and only trade with the United States.”

• Off topic
  ?

  Reply to a debate question

  Relevance 0 of 100

  None of this statement addressed the specific topic under debate.

  See full analysis →

“I want the House to pass this bill. It keeps the federal tax off gasoline and diesel until early 2027 to help Canadians with high fuel costs. Our government is also helping families by cutting income taxes, increasing grocery benefits, and funding school meals.”

“Mr. Speaker, it is a pleasure to take part in today’s debate and to discuss our government’s plan to ease financial pressures on households and help Canadians build a better future for their families and our country. Our government knows that Canada is strongest when we look after one another and ensure everyone has a fair chance to succeed. That is why we are taking action to make everyday life more affordable. In January, the government announced the new Canada groceries and essentials benefit to put more money back in Canadians’ pockets. The benefit is helping more than 12 million low- and modest-income Canadians afford everyday essentials. It replaces the existing GST credit while providing more generous support. We increased it by 25% for five years, starting in July, and added a one-time payment this year. Together, these enhancements will provide substantial support to those most affected by rising food prices. For example, a person living alone who is eligible for the GST credit could previously only receive a maximum of $543 for 2026-27. With the one-time payment and the 2026-27 benefit combined, that person will receive approximately $950 in total. For a couple with two children, total support will increase from approximately $1,086 to $1,890. These increases will make meaningful differences for households facing higher food costs. The benefit is also indexed to inflation to ensure payments rise each year with the cost of living. We are taking these steps because helping Canadians afford everyday essentials is the right thing to do. The Canada groceries and essentials benefit is part of a broader package of measures to ease grocery cost pressures across Canada. Canada’s first-ever national food security strategy will address food insecurity, support producers and strengthen supply chains to help lower prices for Canadians. The strategy is backed by more than $3 billion in investments over 10 years. It includes a $1-billion investment in food infrastructure, including food terminals, to help independent grocers buy and move completely produced products. The strategy also includes a $1-billion investment through Farm Credit Canada and a $150-million food security fund to help Canadian businesses grow, produce and process more food in Canada. A further $750 million will go to expanding year-round Canadian fruit and vegetable production. These measures will address the root causes of food insecurity by strengthening domestic food production and improving access to affordable, nutritious food. We are not only putting more money in the pockets of those who need it the most. We are also helping Canadians keep more of what they earn through a middle-class tax cut. We have reduced the tax rate from 15% to 14%. As a result, nearly 22 million Canadians are receiving tax relief of up to $420 per person, while two-income families can save up to $840 this year. In 2026, the lower rate applies to taxable income of up to $58,523, providing meaningful relief during a period of economic uncertainty. Most of the tax relief will go to Canadians in the two lowest tax brackets, with nearly half directed to those in the first bracket. In other words, the measure is targeted to those who need support the most. Above all, we must consider our children, and that is why we made the national school food program permanent. It will provide healthy school meals to as many as 400,000 children and save families with two children about $800 a year on groceries. Working with provinces, territories and indigenous partners, we will continue to expand the program to more schools across Canada, ensuring that hunger is never a deterrent to getting one’s education. Our government also recognizes that recent global developments have made life more difficult for Canadians. Tariffs imposed by our largest trading partner have had a significant impact on Canadian workers and businesses from coast to coast to coast. Conflict and instability in the Middle East have also driven up fuel prices worldwide. In these circumstances, Canadians need relief, and our government has delivered it. Through carefully targeted measures, we are helping Canadians meet these challenges while strengthening Canada’s sovereignty and economic resilience. For example, last spring we acted to ease the impact of high fuel costs on Canadians. In April, after disruptions to crude oil shipments through the Strait of Hormuz pushed fuel prices higher, our government temporarily suspended the federal fuel excise tax. The measure has saved Canadians and Canadian businesses up to 10¢ per litre on gasoline and unleaded aviation gasoline, up to 11¢ per litre on leaded aviation gasoline and up to four cents a litre on diesel and aviation fuel. The savings were immediate. On the first day the temporary suspensions took effect, gasoline prices fell by 11¢ per litre, providing direct relief to consumers. Through Bill C-38, we propose to continue providing relief at the pump by extending the temporary suspension of the federal fuel excise tax through January 31, 2027, and then from February 1 to March 31, 2027, the tax would apply at 50% of its regular rate. The extension would lower everyday costs for Canadians, including truckers and businesses in the food, agriculture, housing, construction and delivery sectors. In short, it would provide timely, meaningful relief when Canadians need it the most. By easing pressure on gasoline and diesel prices at the pump, we are lowering costs for Canadians today while building a stronger, more resilient and more independent economy for the future. To conclude, Canadians should feel the benefits of economic growth not only in the economic reports but also in their wallets and around the kitchen table. That starts with ensuring that everyone can afford to put good food on the table. We are building a stronger Canada, one where economic growth improves everyday life and gives every Canadian a fair opportunity to succeed. That is how we will build a more prosperous and inclusive future.”

• Echo ×14

  A repeated line

  “We have also made the national school food program permanent.”

  Said 14 times by 11 members since May 7.

  Every time it was said →