“The Prime Minister announced a $2-billion heat pump program that helps companies owned by Brookfield. This is a clear conflict of interest. How much money will Brookfield and the Prime Minister make from taxpayers?”

“Mr. Speaker, in another convenient example of public policy aligning with Brookfield’s strategy of tax dollars being used to limit private risk and profit, the Prime Minister announced a $2-billion heat pump rebate program today. Let us play a game. Trane, which is owned by Brookfield, finances and installs heat pumps. Enercare is owned by Brookfield, and it finances and installs heat pumps. The conflict of interest is so blatantly obvious, but what is surprising is the Prime Minister is not even hiding it anymore. How much do the Prime Minister and Brookfield stand to make off the backs of taxpayers?”

“The Prime Minister has investments in Brookfield, which owns heat pump companies. Today's $2-billion government announcement will make his investments worth more. I want him to tell us how much money he and Brookfield will make from taxpayers, and how this is not corrupt.”

“Mr. Speaker, it is not surprising that he does not want to answer these questions, but maybe he will answer this one. The Prime Minister knows exactly what is in his portfolio. Trane heat pumps and Enercare are owned by Brookfield. He stands to make millions in deferred stock units, stock options and carried interest. Today’s $2-billion taxpayer-funded announcement increases the value of his personal assets and Brookfield’s. I ask again, how much do the Prime Minister and Brookfield stand to make off the backs of taxpayers with today’s announcement? Maybe he will answer this question: How is that not corrupt?”