Adjournment Proceedings

This late-night adjournment debate was about changes to Canada’s pesticide rules made through Bill C-30, which allows cabinet to override decisions by the Minister of Health and the pesticide regulator in certain circumstances. Elizabeth May of the Green Party asked why the government moved ahead with these changes, saying the law lets cabinet set aside health officials’ decisions on dangerous pesticides without hearing scientific witnesses, and that Canada’s pesticide rules are already weaker than those of the European Union and Brazil, which she said has led the EU to reject some Canadian crops. She argued rules should be strengthened so farmers can sell crops internationally. Maggie Chi, a Liberal parliamentary secretary, said health and safety remain the top priority, and described the bill as letting Health Canada consider the economy and food supply alongside health, with any emergency pesticide use being temporary, strict, and limited to major disruptions like crop failures. The exchange stayed on this back-and-forth about the pesticide provisions.Written by AI from the debate. Updated .

Official text (opens in a new tab)

2 statements

Maggie Chi, Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Health

Liberal
“I support the changes in this bill. Health and safety are still our top priority. The bill lets Health Canada consider the economy and food supply alongside health when making decisions on pesticides. Any special pesticide use would be temporary, strict, and only allowed during major emergencies like crop failures.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, my colleague has long been a powerful voice for the environment. I have immense respect for her. First and foremost, I want to reassure her that the health and safety of Canadians will always be our top concern, and nothing that was in Bill C-30 takes away from the fact that the minister’s top concern in making economic security and food security orders is always going to be preventing unacceptable risks to human health and to the environment. However, I think it is worth looking more broadly at what these changes do. The bill comes at a time when economic and food security are major concerns for all of us, not just because of the United States’ action towards Canada, but also because of how climate change is impacting farmers and crops across the country and around the world. This is why our changes would be so important. For the first time, we would be asking that when Health Canada makes decisions on pesticides, we consider economic security and food security not above any other considerations, but alongside them. Any use of pesticides under these new rules would be temporary and would come with strict conditions attached. They would also be used in exceptional, time-limited circumstances where action was needed to protect national or regional economic security or national food security, such as in the event of a major crop failure or supply disruption. The goal really would be to protect the health and food security of Canadians while also ensuring a safe and affordable food supply. As the Prime Minister and Minister of Health have both said, we are at a hinge moment. We must build on our strength to lead our country with confidence in its next chapter. A key part of this is working with our provincial and territorial partners, as well as local and global partners, to strengthen food security and economic resilience. If we act now, we can ensure that Canada’s agriculture and health sectors are a source of our stability, a catalyst for productivity and a strong foundation for our prosperity.

Maggie Chi, Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Health

Liberal
“We want to keep Canadians safe and healthy. That means protecting our food supply during major disruptions, and our changes will help do that.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, obviously, we want to make sure we are keeping Canadians safe and healthy, and that means ensuring we have a stable and secure food supply even during major disruptions. Our changes would help make that happen.

Discussion

No comments yet

See the full discussion

Comment rules

More from sitting 151

  1. Government Orders Strengthening Canada's Defence Sector Act 79 statements
  2. Oral Questions Public Services and Procurement 5 statements
  3. Oral Questions Finance 4 statements
  4. Oral Questions The Economy 8 statements
  5. Oral Questions The Environment 2 statements
  6. Oral Questions Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship 15 statements
  7. Oral Questions Canadian Culture and Identity 4 statements
  8. Oral Questions Public Services and Procurement 11 statements
  9. Oral Questions Finance 2 statements
  10. Oral Questions Employment 10 statements
  11. Oral Questions International Trade 7 statements
  12. Oral Questions Finance 8 statements
  13. Oral Questions Small Business 2 statements
  14. Oral Questions The Economy 2 statements
  15. Oral Questions Health 2 statements
  16. Oral Questions Justice 2 statements
  17. Government Orders Government Orders 2 statements
  18. Government Orders Strengthening Canada's Defence Sector Act 44 statements
  19. Private Members' Business Canada Revenue Agency Act 6 statements
  20. Government Orders Canadian Fuel Affordability Act 164 statements
  21. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  22. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  23. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements