Privilege
The House held a debate on a question of privilege raised by the member for Kitchener South—Hespeler concerning the parliamentary work of the member for Thunder Bay—Rainy River. The parliamentary secretary to the government House leader argued the matter did not constitute a breach of privilege, saying members’ free speech in their parliamentary work is protected and outside groups cannot punish them for it, and that the Speaker already has the power to protect members’ rights without a special vote.Written by AI from the debate. Updated .
No matching statements
No statements match this filter
Choose another party or return to all statements.
More from sitting 152
- Oral Questions The Economy 11 statements
- Oral Questions Government Priorities 4 statements
- Oral Questions Labour 2 statements
- Oral Questions Public Services and Procurement 7 statements
- Oral Questions Canadian Identity and Culture 3 statements
- Oral Questions The Economy 8 statements
- Oral Questions Foreign Affairs 2 statements
- Oral Questions Housing 11 statements
- Oral Questions Immigration 2 statements
- Oral Questions Natural Resources 2 statements
- Oral Questions Public Safety 6 statements
- Oral Questions Indigenous Affairs 2 statements
- Oral Questions Air Transportation 2 statements
- Oral Questions Labour 6 statements
- Oral Questions Justice 2 statements
- Government Orders Safe Social Media Act 47 statements
- Oral Questions The Economy 11 statements
- Oral Questions Finance 2 statements
- Government Orders Privilege 1 statement
- Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
- Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
- Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
- Private Members' Business Georgina's Law 11 statements