The Economy

In question period on the economy, Conservatives pointed to record food bank use—citing 2.4 million visits in one month nationally, 3.2 million monthly requests in Quebec, and rising visits in the territories, with about a third involving children—to argue the government’s affordability measures are not working, and asked the government to lower costs, including by removing federal taxes on diesel. Liberal members replied by pointing to their programs: national child care, dental care, the Canada child benefit, and a national school food program reaching 400,000 more children, and repeatedly asked why Conservatives vote against these measures. Most exchanges stayed on this back-and-forth about food insecurity and government supports.Written by AI from the debate. Updated .

Official text (opens in a new tab)

6 statements

Anna Gainey, Secretary of State (Children and Youth)

Liberal
“I want the opposition to answer why they voted against school food. I also want them to explain why they voted against dental workers.”
  • Government answer in Question Period

    Relevance 0 of 100

    None of this answer addressed the specific question that was asked.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I would also like to ask why members opposite can stand in the House on this issue without answering the question as to why they vote against school food. Why do they vote against dental workers? Some hon. members: Oh, oh!

Anna Gainey, Secretary of State (Children and Youth)

Liberal
“Our government helps Canadians by providing cheaper child care, dental care, and food programs in schools. The opposition keeps voting against these helpful programs. It makes no sense.”
  • Government answer in Question Period

    Relevance 17 of 100

    None of this answer addressed the specific question that was asked.

    See full analysis
  • A repeated line

    “Dental care and the national school food program.”

    Said 4 times by 4 members since May 7.

    Every time it was said
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, time and again, we take action on this side of the House. The government has advanced a national child care strategy, dental care and a national school food program, among other efforts to help Canadians make ends meet. Members opposite continue to vote against these things that have direct impacts on the people in their communities who rely on things such as checkups at the dentist and affordable child care. It makes no sense.

Anna Gainey, Secretary of State (Children and Youth)

Liberal
“Our school food program now feeds 400,000 more children and reaches 80% of public schools. I want to know why the opposition votes against school meals, dental care, and other help for families.”
  • Government answer in Question Period

    Relevance 25 of 100

    None of this answer addressed the specific question that was asked.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, the national school food program is reaching an additional 400,000 children across this country with nutritious meals. That is 80% of public schools across this country that are benefiting from this support. Again, why do the members opposite vote against things such as breakfast for children in elementary schools, dental care and other things that help families make ends meet?

Joanne Thompson, Minister of Fisheries

Liberal
“We are finding new trade partners, speeding up big projects, investing in workers, and lowering costs. The Conservatives are just playing politics instead of supporting projects that help Canadians.”
  • Government answer in Question Period

    Relevance 25 of 100

    None of this answer addressed the specific question that was asked.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, apart from the suite of supports that my colleagues have outlined already today, we are also diversifying our trade partners, supercharging major projects, investing in workers, drawing down costs and keeping the needs of Canadians foremost in every decision. The other side of the House is just playing politics today. Why do the Conservatives not come along with the projects that are actually making a difference for this country and in people’s lives?

Joël Lightbound, Minister of Government Transformation, Public Works and Procurement and Quebec Lieutenant

Liberal
“The Conservatives keep voting against programs that help the people they represent. These include dental care, child benefits, food money, and school meals. I want them to start voting for measures that help their constituents.”
  • Government answer in Question Period

    Relevance 19 of 100

    None of this answer addressed the specific question that was asked.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I find this line of questioning absolutely fascinating coming from a member and a party that consistently, at every opportunity, vote against measures that are actually helping their constituents. Take the Canadian dental care plan, for example, which is helping thousands of his constituents in Portneuf—Jacques-Cartier. Other examples include the Canada child benefit, the Canada groceries and essentials benefit, the national school food program and the list goes on. It is time for the members across the way to back up their words with action and start voting in favour of measures that will help their constituents.

Joël Lightbound, Minister of Government Transformation, Public Works and Procurement and Quebec Lieutenant

Liberal
“Our programs are working. In the member's riding, thousands of families get child benefit money, and thousands of people now have dental care. He voted against dental care, and he needs to start voting for what helps his constituents.”
  • Government answer in Question Period

    Relevance 0 of 100

    None of this answer addressed the specific question that was asked.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, if the member believes these measures are not working, then he should explain that to the 24,366 children and their families who receive $80 million annually through the Canada child benefit. He should also explain it to the 23,855 people in his riding who now have access to dental care through the Canadian dental care plan, a program he voted against. He should tell them that the program does not work, that it is not important, that the dental care that they and every Canadian should have access to makes no difference, and that the support this program provides is somehow not working. I urge him to come to his senses and, at the very least, start voting in the interests of his constituents.

Discussion

No comments yet

See the full discussion

Comment rules

More from sitting 152

  1. Oral Questions The Economy 11 statements
  2. Oral Questions Government Priorities 4 statements
  3. Oral Questions Labour 2 statements
  4. Oral Questions Public Services and Procurement 7 statements
  5. Oral Questions Canadian Identity and Culture 3 statements
  6. Oral Questions The Economy 8 statements
  7. Oral Questions Foreign Affairs 2 statements
  8. Oral Questions Housing 11 statements
  9. Oral Questions Immigration 2 statements
  10. Oral Questions Natural Resources 2 statements
  11. Oral Questions Public Safety 6 statements
  12. Oral Questions Indigenous Affairs 2 statements
  13. Oral Questions Air Transportation 2 statements
  14. Oral Questions Labour 6 statements
  15. Oral Questions Justice 2 statements
  16. Government Orders Safe Social Media Act 47 statements
  17. Oral Questions The Economy 11 statements
  18. Oral Questions Finance 2 statements
  19. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  20. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  21. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  22. Private Members' Business Georgina's Law 11 statements