Adjournment Proceedings

A question was raised regarding the government’s $300 million PrescribeIT program, with the Conservatives citing allegations of mismanagement and reporting that $200 million of the funds went unaccounted for. They stated that the government should have been more aware of the program’s issues and the compensation paid to its CEO. The Liberal government responded that the minister took action as soon as the problem was known, noting that an independent review is already underway and the Auditor General found no further action was necessary.Written by AI from the debate. Updated .

Official text (opens in a new tab)

4 statements

Michael Cooper, St. Albert—Sturgeon River

Conservative
“The government spent $300 million on an online prescription program that barely works, and $200 million of that money is missing. The head of that program was paid $1 million a year, got huge bonuses, and received another $1 million when he was fired. Liberal ministers ignored this and tried to hide it. I want the government to explain how it can justify this spending.”
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, I rise to follow up on a question that I posed to the Minister of Health regarding the outrageous compensation paid to Michael Green, the CEO in charge of the Liberals’ $300-million PrescribeIT debacle. PrescribeIT, of course, is the Liberal government’s program that was supposed to digitize and streamline prescriptions across Canada. It is now $300 million later, and there is almost nothing to show for it at PrescribeIT. Instead of streamlining and digitizing prescriptions, PrescribeIT accounts for only a meagre 5% of prescriptions across Canada. On top of that, fully 200 million tax dollars are missing and unaccounted for. That is 200 million tax dollars that literally went into a black hole. For all of that, the CEO, Mr. Green, was awarded compensation of $1 million a year, including, in his last year, receiving a $215,000 performance bonus. He received $1 million of compensation for no work, with nothing to show for it other than 200 million tax dollars that literally went into a black hole. All of this occurred under the watch of the current health minister and previous Liberal health ministers, who all turned a blind eye. Since this scandal became public, the Liberals have been in full cover-up mode. Despite all of the attempts to cover up all that went on at PrescribeIT, including the outrageous compensation that was awarded to Mr. Green, we have been doing some digging. The more we dig, the more we learn and the worse it gets. Court filings reveal that Mr. Green was actually awarded $600,000 in performance bonuses between 2022 and 2025 for work that was characterized as exceeding, thriving and delivering. We cannot make this stuff up. The Minister of Health pats herself on the back for terminating Mr. Green, but she only did so after this scandal came to light and she, effectively, had no choice. What the health minister failed to disclose, which we subsequently learned upon obtaining Mr. Green’s termination letter, is that he received $1 million on his way out the door, a $1-million golden parachute. How do the Liberals justify any of this?

Corey Hogan, Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Energy and Natural Resources

Liberal
“The minister acted as soon as she learned about this problem. She could not act before she knew. Using tax dollars properly matters. An independent group is already reviewing this organization, and I look forward to seeing the results.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Relevance 100 of 100

    Of this reply, 100% addressed the question or point raised.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, we, in the House, have had this question come up a number of times, and I am happy to reiterate some of the basic facts and maybe get into them in the returns. The reality is simple. When the minister found out, the minister acted. It is not reasonable to expect the minister to act before she found out on its surface. It is important that tax dollars are used properly. That is a fundamental principle of any democracy. That is a fundamental principle of any government. We have an independent review of the organization’s governance and structure under way in a third-party audit of the organization’s findings. This is the start of any such process. This is what proper governance looks like. The Auditor General would agree, as she found that doing a study herself would be “duplicative and therefore of limited added value for Parliamentarians and Canadians.” There is a process under way. We follow the rules in this country. We follow due process in this country. I look forward to hearing the results, as I know all Canadians do, and to making sure that we can further protect the spending of Canadian dollars.

Michael Cooper, St. Albert—Sturgeon River

Conservative
“The government spent $300 million on a failed program, and another $200 million went missing over 10 years. It is not enough to say the minister acted only when she found out. Health ministers should have known what was happening. The minister must take responsibility for this.”
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, is the member talking about further protecting the tax dollars of Canadians? There has been $300 million to a failed program and 200 million tax dollars that went unaccounted for during 10 years under the Liberal government’s watch, and the parliamentary secretary says, “Well, the minister acted when she found out about it.” What was she doing all this time? What were Liberal health ministers doing all this time? What part of ministerial responsibility does the minister not accept?

Corey Hogan, Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Energy and Natural Resources

Liberal
“The minister took action as soon as she found out about the issue. An independent review is already happening, and the Auditor General said doing another review would not help.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Relevance 100 of 100

    Of this reply, 100% addressed the question or point raised.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, this is a question that has come up a number of times. The minister acted when she found out. There is an independent review under way. The Auditor General has found that additional action by the Auditor General would not add value. At this point, that is where the record stands.

Discussion

No comments yet

See the full discussion

Comment rules

More from sitting 153

  1. Government Orders Business of Supply 51 statements
  2. Government Orders Business of Supply 64 statements
  3. Oral Questions Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship 2 statements
  4. Oral Questions Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship 6 statements
  5. Oral Questions Government Priorities 6 statements
  6. Oral Questions Public Services and Procurement 14 statements
  7. Oral Questions Canadian Identity and Culture 4 statements
  8. Oral Questions Canada Revenue Agency 4 statements
  9. Oral Questions The Economy 6 statements
  10. Oral Questions Employment 2 statements
  11. Oral Questions Steel and Aluminum Industry 15 statements
  12. Oral Questions Employment 3 statements
  13. Oral Questions The Economy 2 statements
  14. Oral Questions Sports 2 statements
  15. Oral Questions Finance 6 statements
  16. Oral Questions Foreign Affairs 2 statements
  17. Oral Questions Points of Order 2 statements
  18. Government Orders Business of Supply 31 statements
  19. Oral Questions Government Priorities 2 statements
  20. Oral Questions The Economy 6 statements
  21. Oral Questions The Economy 4 statements
  22. Government Orders Business of Supply 30 statements
  23. Private Members' Business Canada Labour Code 4 statements
  24. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  25. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  26. Oral Questions Business of the House 2 statements