Canadian Space Launch Act

Bill C-28, Canadian Space Launch Act · Second reading · now at second reading in the House Where it stands

What Bill C-28 would do

The bill would create legal rules under the Aeronautics Act for space launches and re-entry activities in Canada. It would expand regulation powers over launch vehicles, re-entry vehicles, and the operation and zoning of launch sites. The bill would also let the Minister of Transport indemnify operators for third-party damages in specific public interest cases, or require operators to indemnify the government. Additionally, it would give the minister emergency powers to stop launches for safety or security reasons.

Official text (opens in a new tab)

12 statements

Marilyn Gladu, Sarnia—Lambton—Bkejwanong

Liberal
“The member mentioned gaps in this space launch bill. What changes would he like to see made to it in committee?”
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, I would like to thank the member opposite for his service to our country and for his speech, and echo his condolences to the families of those who lost their lives at Wainwright, or are injured and recovering. Interestingly, I did not know that the member had a degree in space. I always knew he was smart, but now I know he is a rocket scientist. I also know Geoff Sheerin, who the member talked about in his speech, because he now lives in my riding. He is a real rocket scientist. What he is working on now with AlumaPower is a battery-powered portable kit that can be taken to the front lines of the battle to power the medical tents with no heat signal and no noise. It is just a super invention. I love to see technology move forward. The member talked about the gaps that he sees. Could he summarize the kinds of amendments that he would like to see brought to this bill when it goes to committee.

Kevin Lamoureux, Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons

Liberal
“I am surprised the Conservatives keep criticizing this bill. Former Conservative minister Peter MacKay supports it, and the provincial government supports it too.”
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, I am a bit surprised at the Conservative Party’s positioning on this and its constant criticism. I understand that Peter MacKay is someone who actually supports it. I realize he is more of a Progressive Conservative, as opposed to a far right Conservative, which we see across the way. I also understand that the provincial government is supporting the—

Kevin Lamoureux, Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons

Liberal
“Nova Scotia's Conservative government supports and invests in the space industry. I want the member to explain why the far right opposes space.”
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, the member might not like the description of his political entity, but that is the reality of it, quite frankly. We have the province of Nova Scotia, which is, by the way, led by another Progressive Conservative, and it is not only supporting it but also investing in it. Can the member tell us why the far right is in opposition to space?

Dominique O'Rourke, Guelph

Liberal
“I want the House to pass this bill so Canada can launch its own satellites. Other countries are moving fast in the space race, but we still pay foreign nations to launch our satellites. We need clear rules so companies can invest here, protect our security, and keep our daily technology working.”
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, it is my first time speaking in the House since the tragedy at Wainwright in Alberta last Saturday, so I want to offer my condolences, certainly to the families of the soldiers who are deceased; to the families, loved ones and communities of the soldiers who are injured; and to all the personnel of the Canadian Armed Forces. We are with them wholeheartedly, today and always, and we will absolutely remember their sacrifice. I rise today to speak to Bill C‑28. This is an essential bill because we are in a race. It is not a rhetorical race but rather a race for investment, infrastructure and legislation. Countries around the world are moving quickly. The United States, the United Kingdom, Australia, Japan, India and New Zealand have each built launch sites, passed modern space legislation and committed billions of dollars to securing sovereign access to space and data. Government investment in space launches is increasing around the world, with government spending in the space sector reaching approximately $130 billion globally in 2024. If Canada does not act quickly, it may fall behind. That is why I am rising today to speak to the Canadian space launch act at second reading. This bill is long overdue, and it is essential to building Canada’s legacy as a leading space nation. Canada is not new to space. We are one of its pioneers. In 1962, Canada launched the Alouette I and became the third country in the world to place a satellite in orbit. We built the Canadarm. Our astronauts range from Marc Garneau to University of Guelph alumna Roberta Bondar, the first Canadian woman in space; Chris Hadfield; David Saint-Jacques; Jeremy Hansen; and just a few weeks ago, Joshua Kutryk, who is currently on the International Space Station. They have inspired generations, and their research informs important scientific discoveries. Canada is known globally for excellence in robotics, earth observation and satellite communications. That is a proud legacy. Space is not out there; it is in every community. The University of Guelph, in my riding, is home to leading expertise in satellite earth observation and remote sensing. It uses satellite data to support precision agriculture, environmental monitoring and climate research. As Canada strengthens its sovereign space capabilities and AI capabilities, communities such as Guelph are already helping develop the talent and innovation that will turn that data into economic and public benefits. This is strategic data. Canada wants sovereignty over this strategic data. To have that, we must launch our satellites in Canada. The industry has already made significant investments to grow the space sector and push the limits of innovation. Canada’s own space sector now supports more than 13,800 direct high-scale jobs, a nearly 6% workforce increase in 2023, and sustains an additional 12,500 jobs across the broader economy. For growth in this sector, the sky is literally the limit, but industry needs government to provide the regulatory certainty and confidence companies require to attract and sustain new investment. My colleagues across the way confirm that. Canada designs satellites, manufactures components and trains world-class engineers only to ship our work off to other countries so that they can launch those satellites, as my Conservative colleague mentioned. That results in higher costs, longer delays and greater uncertainty. The opposition party wants to move quickly and innovate, but now all of a sudden it wants to put the brakes on. I cannot understand them. Why is space important? It is important because satellites form the backbone of almost all aspects of modern daily life in Canada. When Canadians use their phones to get directions or to do their banking online, they are using satellites. Satellites provide Internet, television and telephone services to rural, northern and remote communities. Space weather forecasts alert us to severe weather events, such as blizzards, heat waves and heavy rain. Satellite technology is also essential for monitoring sea ice, vessel traffic and marine pollution, especially in Canada’s Arctic and coastal regions. Satellites are essential infrastructure just like roads, hospitals and airports, but they are only reliable if we can launch, maintain, defend and replace them on our own terms, according to our own needs, without depending on another country. A country that cannot launch its own satellites depends on the goodwill of foreign countries to keep its infrastructure running. That is a vulnerability that we can and must eliminate. Space has become an increasingly hostile and contested domain, so there is a greater need to safeguard our critical space assets. Many of our allies have acknowledged this fact and are already investing heavily in space-based defence and sovereign space launch capabilities. There is no defence without space. Canada has an opportunity to provide a much sought-after service to our allies that can support several multilateral security objectives. In this new space race, existing global demand for launch far exceeds the supply of launch services, so foreign governments and international companies are actively seeking alternatives in stable, trusted countries like Canada. Once again, Canada has what the world wants, and part of that is our geography. The proposed legislation would allow Canada to harness its natural advantages of land, coastlines and talent, and to build the frameworks necessary to support a viable, safe industry of space launch and re-entry. The Canadian space launch act is a framework that is necessary to ensure that all launch and re-entry activities in Canada would be conducted safely, securely, sustainably and in the public interest. This is not strictly about science or industry. This is a fundamental question of sovereignty. Canada needs its own means to collect its own data. Our ability to lead in AI depends on good data, including strategic satellite data that powers everything from climate forecasting and agriculture to Arctic surveillance, while ensuring that Canadians retain sovereignty over critical data sets rather than relying on foreign providers to launch our satellites. A sovereign satellite and launch capability strengthens our security, economic competitiveness and resilience, enabling Canadian-made AI systems built for Canadian conditions and ensuring uninterrupted access to vital data during times of crisis. Canadian innovators are ready to compete. They need legal authority and clear rules to follow so they can raise capital, build prototypes, test new technologies and attract international clients right here in Canada. That is what this act would provide. The act would improve safety by implementing a modern, risk-informed approach to regulations that is aligned with international best practices and complemented by a robust regime of oversight, inspection and enforcement, exactly what members opposite were calling for a second ago. It would also require operators to carry insurance and to demonstrate, before any launch is authorized, the financial responsibility to cover any damages that may occur. This is not a partisan issue, nor should it be. The question is whether Canada intends to compete in the 21st century or stand on the sidelines while others seize opportunities that should be ours. If the House passes the Canadian space launch act, Transport Canada will act swiftly to advance the regulatory framework; work with the provinces, territories and indigenous communities that are already on board; coordinate with industry; and establish international partnerships to ensure that Canada is not merely a participant in the global space economy, but a leader. The choice is very simple: Canada can lead, or it can fall behind. Let us choose to be masters in our own house. Let us choose our industries, our sovereignty and our security. I hope all members of the House will choose to lead in sovereign space launch capability, because it is about our economy, science, safety and our sovereignty.

Dominique O'Rourke, Guelph

Liberal
“The police are investigating the claims made here. But this land is worth more now because of its location and what we can do with it. Land always costs more once its use changes. Canada does not have many places to launch satellites, and this is one of them.”
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, those are extraordinary accusations and allegations in the House. I am certain, with the RCMP investigation, that we will investigate and get to the bottom of it, clearly. I want to come back to the whole conversation, though, about how the land is supposedly just a little slab, how it was worth a tiny amount and how we are now paying this much for it. Anyone who knows a thing about zoning knows that every housing development and every factory starts in a field, a slab. It is about the geography. It is about the potential. The minute the zoning changes, the minute the economic opportunity expands, so does the cost. There are not a million places we can launch satellites from in Canada. This is one of them.

Dominique O'Rourke, Guelph

Liberal
“I do not have the exact numbers with me. Building sites like this costs a lot, but it pays off. Experts say the Nova Scotia spaceport could create at least 16,000 jobs and add 300 million dollars to our economy.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Relevance 47 of 100

    None of this reply addressed the specific point raised or the topic under debate.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, I do not have the details in hand. I would say that, in many cases, these are investments in a site’s potential. Anyone involved in development understands this. Although it is costly, the Conference Board of Canada, now known as Signal49, believes that the Nova Scotia spaceport could create 16,000 jobs and contribute $300 million to the gross domestic product. That is just the minimum. The potential of this investment is enormous.

Dominique O'Rourke, Guelph

Liberal
“Changing the rules and permissions for this land makes it much more valuable. That is why this site now has so much economic potential.”
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, the question is a good one and worthy of scrutiny, but I will say again that anyone involved in land speculation can have land that is basically worthless for generations, but when the zoning and the permissions change on that property, the value goes up exponentially. This is basic. This is what is happening. Because of the economic potential of this location at this time, there is increased value in the economic potential and benefits.

Marilyn Gladu, Sarnia—Lambton—Bkejwanong

Liberal
“Canada only has two places where we can launch these kinds of satellites. The $200-million contract pays to build launch pads, not just rent the land. Can the member explain why it is so important for Canada to be able to launch its own satellites?”
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, with respect to the $200-million contract that is being spoken about, I asked questions about this as well because I was concerned. I found out it is not just for the lease, but it is also for the construction of several launching pads at that site. The reality is that there are only two locations in Canada, one in Newfoundland and this one in Nova Scotia, that are able to launch these kinds of satellites. Can the member reinforce why it is so important for Canada to have sovereignty in this area?

Dominique O'Rourke, Guelph

Liberal
“Canada needs its own rules to launch satellites into space. Right now, we have to rely on other countries, which costs us jobs and control over our own data. We need to build our own space industry here.”
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, there are only so many places in the world where we can launch satellites that provide us with really important data that we use every single day. When we have to compete or go to another country and get in line to launch our satellites, that is a problem. The member opposite was speaking earlier about jobs that are fleeing to those places where they can launch satellites, because a whole economic ecosystem develops around those spaces. This is important to provide a framework for our sovereignty, in terms of our launch capability and our sovereignty over data, and also our economic sovereignty of investing in ourselves to create our own, more robust space ecosystem.

Dominique O'Rourke, Guelph

Liberal
“I want us to move forward with this bill. It gives us a framework so we can talk, make changes, and agree on the rules for space launches. The opposition always slows things down by saying bills are not good enough. They rush things they like, but they stall on this. We need to be consistent.”
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, I completely respect the opposition’s role in challenging decisions and in making legislation better. I am going to point out another trend, though. It’s the trend of saying that we know we need this, but let us really slow it down, as with Bill C-16. It is great legislation, but to them it does not go far enough, so they are going to vote against security for women. I see the irony when the Leader of the Opposition says to call him when there is pipe in the ground. Before there is even a path on a pipeline, they want to hurry up on the pipeline, yet now we need a lot more frameworks and a lot more conversation. What I am saying is that there is room for conversation. This is a framework. It will invite conversation, amendment and agreement. We already have agreement in Nova Scotia with the premier, indigenous communities and the municipality. There are a lot of trends here, but let us try to be consistent.

Kevin Lamoureux, Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons

Liberal
“The provinces support this space bill and are spending money on it. Working together helps Canada control its own space industry and stay independent, like the satellite maker in Winnipeg. I want to hear the member's thoughts on this.”
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, I appreciate the responses my colleague has been providing. One of the important aspects to recognize is that the province not only supports it but is also investing in it. That speaks volumes in terms of how federal collaboration is ensuring that we have space sovereignty. It does not matter the region of the country. In Winnipeg, we have Magellan, which manufactures satellites. This provides us with even more independence in building an industry that is so vitally important to Canada’s sovereignty. I would like the member to give her thoughts on both or either of those comments.

Dominique O'Rourke, Guelph

Liberal
“We need to invest in our own space industry. Our location and talent can help our economy, protect our data, and attract other countries to launch here.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Relevance 45 of 100

    None of this reply addressed the specific point raised or the topic under debate.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, the question of our sovereignty, namely economic sovereignty, geographic sovereignty and data sovereignty, has never been more pressing. We have an opportunity here to harness our own talent and our own geography. Part of the conversation here is about this location, its relationship to the Arctic and its orbital advantages, things that much smarter people than me know a lot more about. These three priorities are incredibly important at this moment in time. We have an opportunity to serve our own space industry and to invite other countries to launch here, because we are a trusted partner, we are stable and we have the geography. It is the time to invest in ourselves.

Discussion

No comments yet

See the full discussion

Comment rules

More from sitting 154

  1. Oral Questions The Economy 4 statements
  2. Oral Questions Finance 4 statements
  3. Oral Questions The Economy 4 statements
  4. Oral Questions Official Languages 7 statements
  5. Oral Questions The Economy 10 statements
  6. Oral Questions The Environment 2 statements
  7. Oral Questions Finance 10 statements
  8. Oral Questions Automotive Industry 2 statements
  9. Oral Questions Small Business 8 statements
  10. Oral Questions Veterans Affairs 4 statements
  11. Oral Questions The Economy 2 statements
  12. Oral Questions Finance 2 statements
  13. Oral Questions International Trade 2 statements
  14. Oral Questions Justice 2 statements
  15. Oral Questions Democratic Institutions 4 statements
  16. Private Members' Business Weights and Measures Act 32 statements
  17. Oral Questions Housing 2 statements
  18. Oral Questions Agriculture and Agri-Food 4 statements
  19. Oral Questions Natural Resources 4 statements
  20. Oral Questions Health 7 statements
  21. Government Orders Canadian Space Launch Act 32 statements
  22. Private Members' Business National Strategy on Flood and Drought Forecasting Act 3 statements
  23. Oral Questions Labour 2 statements