Adjournment Proceedings

An adjournment debate on health care in the Similkameen—South Okanagan—West Kootenay area, where the Conservative member said emergency rooms are closing, a hospital is losing neurologists, and thousands of trained doctors in Canada cannot practise because of licensing barriers; she asked the government to create a program to quickly license those doctors. The Liberal parliamentary secretary replied that provinces regulate doctor licensing, said the Conservatives’ proposal is not realistic at the national level, and pointed to federal measures such as encouraging provinces to recognize foreign credentials, a $5 billion fund for hospital projects, and the dental care program for seniors. The Conservative member said the government is out of touch with rural and aging communities and repeated her call to adopt her party’s plan. The Liberal member asked whether she had approached her province about accessing the federal fund and noted the Conservatives voted against the dental program.Written by AI from the debate. Updated .

Official text (opens in a new tab)

2 statements

Kevin Lamoureux, Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons

Liberal
“The Conservatives' plan to license doctors across Canada is not realistic because provinces control doctor licensing. The federal government helps by encouraging provinces to recognize foreign credentials and by setting aside $5 billion for hospital projects. We need provinces and universities to work together so qualified doctors can actually practice.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I want to be kind. The blue seal program the Conservative Party talks about, at the national level, is just not real. I think there are some people within the Conservative Party who understand that. Maybe some do not. I used to be the health care critic for the Province of Manitoba. The issue of doctors and the placement of doctors, and so forth, is the responsibility of provinces. The biggest barrier in terms of recognizing doctors is not a federal initiative. Often a federal government can encourage and promote provinces to get doctors recognized. It saddens me when doctors or potential doctors are leaving the province of Manitoba and going to other jurisdictions, even countries such as Australia, where they become doctors but then come back and are not getting recognized. This is a serious issue. The federal government is doing what it can to promote and encourage things such as mobility across Canada. We need more of that. We need our health care professionals to get better recognition for the skill sets they have. I remember an incident when I went to a furniture store on St. James Street. This happened when I was the health care critic. The province was actually busing pregnant women from Brandon, I believe it was, to the city of Winnipeg because we did not have enough doctors in Brandon to deliver babies. Meanwhile, the guy who was selling me furniture had delivered babies in India for years. He gave me the impression that it was hundreds of babies. He could not get his credentials recognized in Canada. The provinces play a critical role in the numbers of doctors. The stakeholders we are talking about deal with universities, our professional organizations and provincial governments, working more closely at resolving the issues, such as residency positions in hospitals, and, again, educational facilities. From a federal government perspective, we not only have had a Prime Minister who has actually made a commitment to preserving the strength of our health care system from a federal perspective, but we are also doing more. To give a specific example, we have now put aside $5 billion for capital health care expansions. For the first time, we are saying that we are going to give x number of dollars for capital so we can get capital expansion strictly with health care. I, for one, am hoping for things such as some money going toward expanding the number of beds at the Seven Oaks General Hospital. I would like more money invested in research and health care, in particular cancer research out of the Health Sciences Centre. There are incredible people who work there. The federal government is stepping up. The federal government has stepped up in the past to deal with things such as palliative care and mental health. Yes, we have the Canada Health Act. It is important that we look at ways in which we can support our—

Kevin Lamoureux, Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons

Liberal
“The federal government is investing heavily in health care and created a dental program for seniors on fixed incomes. Conservatives voted against that dental care. Instead of complaining, they should help their local projects access federal funds, just like I do.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, has the member actually approached the province and said, “There is a federal fund of $5 billion. If there is a project here, what is being done to try to access some of those dollars?” I can tell the member that I have done that. The member talks about dissing seniors. Let us remember, we have a dental program for seniors, including seniors that are on a fixed income in the member’s own riding. Yet the Conservatives vote against that. Dental care is a part of health care. Conservative members should talk to a senior that needs to get dental work done, and they will have a better appreciation of that. The federal government understands the issue of health care. We are doing what we can to support our national health care system through transfer payments and targets, investing in capital. The federal government is stepping up. The Conservatives need to step up where they can.

Discussion

No comments yet

See the full discussion

Comment rules

More from sitting 158

  1. Government Orders Safe Social Media Act 38 statements
  2. Government Orders Safe Social Media Act 81 statements
  3. Oral Questions International Trade 18 statements
  4. Oral Questions Finance 14 statements
  5. Oral Questions Justice 8 statements
  6. Oral Questions Public Safety 2 statements
  7. Oral Questions International Trade 2 statements
  8. Oral Questions Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship 8 statements
  9. Oral Questions Government Appointments 5 statements
  10. Oral Questions Steel and Aluminum Industry 7 statements
  11. Oral Questions The Economy 2 statements
  12. Oral Questions Fisheries and Oceans 2 statements
  13. Oral Questions Taxation 2 statements
  14. Oral Questions The Environment 2 statements
  15. Oral Questions Finance 2 statements
  16. Oral Questions Business of the House 2 statements
  17. Government Orders Safe Social Media Act 23 statements
  18. Oral Questions The Economy 2 statements
  19. Government Orders Safe Social Media Act 42 statements
  20. Oral Questions Intergovernmental Relations 4 statements
  21. Oral Questions Public Safety 2 statements
  22. Oral Questions Families, Children and Social Development 2 statements
  23. Private Members' Business National Strategy for Soil Health Act 16 statements
  24. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  25. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  26. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements