International Trade

During question period on international trade, members focused on the Canada-EU summit in Montreal and Canada’s trade relationship with Europe. The Conservative leader asked repeatedly whether the government would get nine European countries that have not approved the existing free trade agreement to ratify it, open European markets to Canadian beef and pork, and respond to the EU’s threatened carbon tariff on Canadian goods, arguing the government was focusing on summits while Canadians faced high food and housing costs. The government pointed to the summit in Montreal, said co-operation with the EU covers trade, energy, defence, artificial intelligence and transportation, noted first LNG shipments to Germany, and said Canada is on track to double its non-U.S. exports. Bloc Québécois members asked about European carbon-based tariffs they said would cost Quebec’s aluminum, steel and iron exports hundreds of millions of dollars because Canada scrapped its carbon pricing, and raised concerns about weakened pesticide rules affecting food exports; the government said Quebec’s aluminum is among the greenest in the world and pointed to its investments and broader market access for Quebec businesses.Written by AI from the debate. Updated .

Official text (opens in a new tab)

3 statements

Christine Normandin, Saint-Jean

Bloc Québécois
“Quebec wants to trade more with Europe, but Canada's climate choices are hurting us. The European Union taxes goods from countries that do not protect the environment. Because Canada ended its carbon tax, Europe could charge $2.8 billion in fees on our goods next year, including $800 million on metal from Quebec. The government must admit its weak climate rules are hurting Quebec trade.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, Quebec wants to boost trade with Europe in the face of the tariff crisis, but CBC is reporting that Canada is going to hamper our efforts. The European Union imposes tariffs on products from countries with poor environmental records. Since Canada, unlike Quebec, has scrapped its carbon pricing, it is exposing us to penalties. An internal memo estimates that $2.8 billion worth of goods will be subject to tariffs next year, including $800 million on aluminum, steel and iron from Quebec alone. Do the Liberals realize that their climate capitulation is standing in the way of Quebec trade?

Christine Normandin, Saint-Jean

Bloc Québécois
“Canada's decisions on carbon pricing mean European tariffs will hit 800 million dollars' worth of Quebec metals. This will hurt Quebec's exports. I want to know why the government is doing this.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, the CBC must appreciate the minister’s disregard for it. For years, the Bloc Québécois has been warning the federal government that Quebec will be hit harder by European tariffs if Canada ends its carbon pricing. Well, that time has come. Even if Quebec maintains its carbon pricing, 800 million dollars’ worth of our Quebec metals will still be subject to tariffs. Thanks to Canada, we are going to face more customs barriers. Are the Liberals proud of the harm they are doing to Quebec’s exports?

Mario Simard, Jonquière—Hébertville—Pays-des-Bleuets

Bloc Québécois
“Europe is going to put tariffs on Quebec's metal exports because of Canada's policies. The Liberals also weakened pesticide rules and allowed banned pesticides back, which will hurt our food trade with Europe too. Their weak rules will cost Quebec.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, Europe is going to impose tariffs on Quebec’s aluminum, steel and iron exports because of Canada. This may not end with metal exports, because the Liberals also weakened pesticide regulations and even gave themselves the power to reintroduce banned pesticides. Europe has strict standards in this area as well, so that will hinder agri-food trade. Unlike the Liberals, Europe takes these issues seriously. Do they now realize how much their irresponsible deregulation will cost Quebec?

Discussion

No comments yet

See the full discussion

Comment rules

More from sitting 158

  1. Government Orders Safe Social Media Act 38 statements
  2. Government Orders Safe Social Media Act 81 statements
  3. Oral Questions International Trade 18 statements
  4. Oral Questions Finance 14 statements
  5. Oral Questions Justice 8 statements
  6. Oral Questions Public Safety 2 statements
  7. Oral Questions International Trade 2 statements
  8. Oral Questions Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship 8 statements
  9. Oral Questions Government Appointments 5 statements
  10. Oral Questions Steel and Aluminum Industry 7 statements
  11. Oral Questions The Economy 2 statements
  12. Oral Questions Fisheries and Oceans 2 statements
  13. Oral Questions Taxation 2 statements
  14. Oral Questions The Environment 2 statements
  15. Oral Questions Finance 2 statements
  16. Oral Questions Business of the House 2 statements
  17. Government Orders Safe Social Media Act 23 statements
  18. Oral Questions The Economy 2 statements
  19. Government Orders Safe Social Media Act 42 statements
  20. Oral Questions Intergovernmental Relations 4 statements
  21. Oral Questions Public Safety 2 statements
  22. Oral Questions Families, Children and Social Development 2 statements
  23. Private Members' Business National Strategy for Soil Health Act 16 statements
  24. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  25. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  26. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements