MEMBER OF PARLIAMENT

Greg Fergus

Follow by RSS

Fergus pushes for faster approvals of major projects through bills like C-39, defends the government’s affordability measures such as the fuel affordability bill, and presses for the noose to be listed as a hate symbol in the Criminal Code. He builds arguments on anecdotes and personal asides—“I managed to read it last night and this morning”, or “I have been in and around public life for a long time”. He also presses opponents for specifics, asking where a bill actually guts environmental rules.Written by AI from their statements. Updated .

Average grade
A
90 / 100 over 14 statements
Signal 80 / 100
Relevance 92 / 100
Respect 100 / 100
Clarity 95 / 100
Loses points more than most for A story that illustrates instead of making a point.3.6 times as often as most members.What the tags mean ×3.6 Thanks and tributes.2 times as often as most members.What the tags mean ×2.0 Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business.1.6 times as often as most members.What the tags mean ×1.6 Loses points less than most for Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it.Less often than most members.What the tags mean Averaged over the 14 of 29 statements graded so far.

Statements 29

Government Orders ·

Government Orders

In response to a question from Lisa Hepfner

“This bill does not take away religious freedom. People can still quote the Bible or other holy texts and talk about their faith. The bill only stops people from preaching hate and calling for the destruction of a group.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, there has been a lot of information and disinformation with regard to this bill. One of the pieces clearly is that we would be taking away the rights of people of faith, people such as me, who attend church weekly and would feel that this would somehow impede them from speaking openly about their faith. Nothing could be farther from the truth. I can speak the words of sacred text, which for me is the Holy Bible and for others could be the Torah, the Koran or whatever text they have, but the fact is that I still have no right to preach for hate. That is a very high level. Just quoting the Bible, or any sacred text, at all is not what would put it in danger. The problem is when people call for the eradication of an identified group. That remains there regardless of—

In response to a question from Patrick Bonin

“I support this bill because it clearly explains what hate is and helps Canadians live together peacefully. Removing the Bloc Québécois amendment did not change the reach of the bill. It is still a crime to promote hatred, even for religious people.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Relevance 100 of 100

    Of this reply, 100% addressed the question or point raised.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, education is officially a provincial responsibility. However, in a sociological sense, education belongs to all of us. Today’s bill gives us the opportunity to clearly explain to Canadians what hate is and how we can ensure that we live together harmoniously, which is in our country’s nature. My hon. colleague from Repentigny referred to an amendment that he had supported that was withdrawn from the bill. I recognize that it was very important to have the Bloc Québécois’s support, but I would also like to say that, honestly, it did not change anything in terms of the scope of the bill. Even if we are talking about a religious person, the line that is crossed when inciting hatred remains the same. Nothing has changed in that regard, regardless of whether this exemption exists or not. Hatred—

“I want the House to pass this bill, including the change that names the noose as a hate symbol. Black Canadians have dealt with threats like nooses at work for a long time, but the law has not had a clear way to punish them. This bill gives police and courts the power to treat these hate crimes properly.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I rise today not only as a member of Parliament, but also as co-chair of the Parliamentary Black Caucus, a position I share with my dear colleague from Terrebonne, who just gave a very good speech. I would like to bring a slightly different perspective to our discussion this evening on Bill C-9. The Senate amendment, which seeks to designate the noose as a symbol of hatred, is very important. The Senate did excellent work that deserves our support. I would like to speak about what this bill means to the Black communities that I speak with every week, about what this bill means to us and about what it means that Parliament is finally doing it. The word that comes back every time I have a discussion about this is “finally”. Finally, we are dealing with an issue that is of great symbolic importance and is a real symbol of hate for our community. I have been in and around public life for a long time, and for as long as I can remember, Black communities have been telling governments the same thing. They have described a noose left on a workplace, a drawing on a wall or an actual noose being held at a construction site, for example, and what that means to them. They are threats that police have had trouble categorizing, or incidents reported and then quietly filed away because the law had no clear box to categorize them in. They told these stories to commissions, to committees, to ministers and to members of Parliament from every party, and they have told them with a patience, frankly, that these communities should have never needed. For most of that time, the answer they got was sympathy. Sympathy is welcome. Sympathy is appreciated. Sympathy also costs nothing, and communities know the difference between a government that feels for them and a government that legislates for them. Bill C-9 legislates. As I mentioned, as co-chair of the parliamentary Black caucus, I hear from Black Canadians from across this country. They are parents, workers, students, children and elders. When the subject of hate incidents comes up, the pain in those conversations rarely centres on the incidents alone. It centres on what happens afterward, because it is not what happens to someone but what happens afterward that is most important, and the legal process takes what is a racist act and changes it into a generic file. People can carry a great deal. What wears them down is carrying it while institutions look away. When this bill names the noose explicitly in the law of Canada, I want this House to understand how that lands in our communities. The noose has a very specific and painful history for Black Canadians. My hon. colleague talked about the symbol of lynchings. I do not want to be too explicit, but I have to say that hanging, lynching, is not something that just happens by accident. It is often an act that follows torture and terror. It gives a very different perspective. When that symbol appears at a Canadian work site, the person who finds it instantly understands what it means. They know that they could never hold into themselves what the law does not do to protect them. This bill would change that. The law of this country would say in plain text that this symbol, used wilfully to promote hatred and terror, has no place in this country. It would be a message for Black Canadians. This sentence in the Criminal Code would be a recognition that decades of telling the truth about their experience has registered somewhere, that it registered here in this Parliament. Confronting anti-Black hate means naming it, and this Parliament is about to name it. The noose is a symbol that everyone recognizes, and the daily reality of anti-Black hate is usually quieter. It looks like threats, harassment, vandalism and intimidation, and it builds over months. The stand-alone hate crime offence at the heart of Bill C-9 is what would give the justice system the means to treat those acts as what they are. I will leave the legal mechanics to the colleagues who have covered them and will cover them. I just want to say that communities have learned to measure laws by whether anything changes. If they call the police, will actions be taken? That is how people measure whether there is really justice in this country. This bill is built to change what happens when they call. Parliament, as members know, moves slowly, and in moving slowly, often there is wisdom, but sometimes it is the symbol of avoidance; it is an act of avoidance. Regarding the question of hate-motivated crime, I believe we have been slow in the second way. The evidence has been in front of us for years, if not generations. Statistics Canada has documented the rise of anti-Black hate crimes and of police-reported hate crimes year after year. Community organizations have produced report after report. The gap between what communities experience and what the law can capture was identified long ago, and it was identified by people far less powerful than any one of us in this chamber. However, they kept on raising it anyway. It should not have taken this long. I say that as a member of the governing party, and I say that because communities that are watching at home know this to be true, and we need to be honest about what this legislation would do. What I have also learned is that the second-best time to act is now, so let us all support this bill. Bill C-9, finally, would catch up to where people are. I will end with what I started with. Somewhere in the country tonight, there may be a worker going into his workplace and seeing the symbol of the noose being displayed or seeing a drawing of it. Right now, there is a parent explaining to their child what these various symbols of hate represent, having that difficult conversation that so many Canadians have to have with their children and their family. There are people right now deciding whether or not their place of worship, whether it is a church, a synagogue, a mosque or a gurdwara, their holy place, needs security equipment installed to ensure the safety of the people who come to worship. These Canadians are owed many things by their country and by their Parliament. One of them is a criminal law that sees what is happening to them clearly and responds firmly. Black Canadians deserve to know that their government sees that reality and is taking it seriously. So do all the communities that hate has touched, and this bill is how we show it to them. In conclusion, on behalf of the parliamentary Black caucus and on behalf of Black Canadians around this country, I ask every member of this House to please support this bill.

Government Orders ·

Government Orders

“I want the member to explain why this bill should make it illegal to share intimate or fake sexual images of someone without their permission.”
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, I, too, want to wish our dear colleague from Côte-du-Sud—Rivière-du-Loup—Kataskomiq—Témiscouata a speedy recovery. I would also like to thank my colleague from Moncton—Dieppe for her speech. My question relates to amending the Criminal Code to make it illegal for intimate, non-consensual images to be shared. As the member spoke about, and as I know from participating in committee work, this is a particularly terrible scourge for women who have deepfake images or non-consensual sexual images distributed by former partners. Can the member talk about the importance of having this issue corrected and made illegal in Bill C-16?

Statements by Members ·

Jean Augustine

“I want to honour Jean Augustine. She was the first Black woman elected to the House of Commons and the first to serve in cabinet. She is receiving the Pearson Laureate Award today, and I thank her for her service to Canada.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I rise to pay tribute to a true mother of Confederation, the Hon. Jean Augustine. Jean is in Ottawa today to receive the Pearson Laureate Award, its highest honour, joining such past honourees whose leadership has helped make Canada a better country, including Jean Chrétien, Joe Clark and Irwin Cotler. Born in Grenada, she emigrated to Canada in 1960 under the West Indian domestic scheme, the same scheme under which my mother came to Canada. She worked in education, and later served on the founding committee to organize Caribana, now known as the Toronto Caribbean Carnival. Jean Augustine was the first Black woman elected to the House of Commons in 1993, and became the first Black woman to serve in a federal cabinet. She introduced the motion to recognize February as Black History Month. She also introduced a motion to have the Famous Five monument erected on Parliament Hill. On behalf of the entire House, I would like to salute Jean Augustine for her life of public service, and thank her for helping make Canada the modern and inclusive country we enjoy today. I hope all members will join us this evening— Some hon. members: Oh, oh!

Oral Questions ·

Public Safety

“Witnesses told our committee that investigating child sexual abuse takes too long, and that this bill helps police get information faster. How does this bill fit into our plan to keep people safe?”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, this week the Standing Committee on Public Safety heard critical testimony from various witnesses on Bill C-22, including the Canadian Centre for Child Protection. They highlighted that investigations on child sexual exploitation are taking too long and that the bill would help law enforcement get the necessary information quicker. Can the parliamentary secretary to the Minister of Public Safety tell the House how this bill is part of our government’s broader public safety initiative?

Statements by Members ·

Juliet Daniel

“I want to honour Dr. Juliet Daniel, who died last week. She was a leading scientist who helped us understand how cancer spreads, especially in Black women. I send my condolences to her loved ones.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, last week, we lost Dr. Juliet Daniel, a remarkable scientist, mentor and leader whose legacy will live on. Born in Barbados, she came to study at Queen’s University and she earned her Ph.D. at UBC. She went on to become a full professor at McMaster University and a respected voice in her field. I had the privilege of meeting her in Ottawa where she spoke about her research on triple negative breast cancer, which disproportionately affects Black women. Her discovery of the gene Kaiso, named after a type of calypso music, was a significant contribution to understanding how cancer spreads. I give my heartfelt condolences to her loved ones. Dr. Daniel’s time on earth was like a comet: brief yet unforgettable. Though our time together was short, I wish her eternal peace. May her legacy continue to inspire women and researchers everywhere.

Government Orders ·

Government Business No. 9—Changes to the Standing Orders

“The opposition claims what we are doing has never happened before. Has any majority government in Canada or Britain ever given up its majority on committees?”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, in their speeches, the opposition members are saying that what is happening here in Parliament is unprecedented. I have a question for my hon. colleague, the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons. Can he give us an example of any place in Canada or even under the British parliamentary system of a majority government that did not control or hold a majority of seats on committees?

Government Orders ·

Government Business No. 9—Changes to Standing Orders

“Think about the opposite situation. What would happen if a majority government lost members to the other party? What rule would we follow then?”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I would like to do a thought experiment. What would happen if this were the opposite situation, if a government that was in a majority lost members to the opposing party? What would be the principle at work then?