MEMBER OF PARLIAMENT

Pierre Poilievre

Follow by RSS

Poilievre seeks to lower fuel costs, repeal the clean fuel standard, and reverse government deficits he claims add $40,000 in debt per family. He critiques the Liberal government by suggesting leaders operate with self-serving intentions, famously stating that spending benefits “to his banker friends.” He often frames his arguments around the government’s failures.Written by AI from their statements. Updated .

Average grade
A–
89 / 100 over 262 statements
Signal 80 / 100
Relevance 73 / 100
Respect 98 / 100
Clarity 96 / 100
Loses points more than most for Claiming to know a person’s bad motives.6.5 times as often as most members.What the tags mean ×6.5 Mocking a person instead of answering their argument.6.1 times as often as most members.What the tags mean ×6.1 Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it.1.7 times as often as most members.What the tags mean ×1.7 Loses points less than most for A story that illustrates instead of making a point.Less often than most members.What the tags mean Thanks and tributes.Less often than most members.What the tags mean Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about.Less often than most members.What the tags mean Averaged over the 262 of 275 statements graded so far.

Statements 275

Oral Questions ·

The Economy

“Other major countries face the same global problems, but their economies are not shrinking. Why is Canada the only one in a recession?”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, G7 countries are all facing tariffs and global economic impacts. However, Japan is not in recession. The United States is not in recession. The United Kingdom is not in recession. France, Italy and Germany are not in recession. Why is Canada, under the Liberal Prime Minister, the only country in recession?

Statements by Members ·

Anti-Semitism

“We must take action to protect Jewish people from violence and hatred. Attacks on Jewish schools, synagogues, and children are rising. We must condemn this hatred and make sure Jewish Canadians are safe.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, today I rise to express my outrage and disgust as a father. Fourteen-year-old Esti Biran has been missing for over two weeks, since the autistic girl was last seen with no shoes on. Reportedly, on Friday, an anti-Semite began tearing down the missing person posters because she is Jewish. What kind of sicko would do that? This is a child. It compounds the bullets that have been flying into children’s schools, the Molotov cocktails hitting synagogues and the 6,800 anti-Semitic instances, by far a record since the counts began over 40 years ago. We obviously have to take action to protect our Jewish community from this growing scourge of violence and hatred. It all starts with condemning it and stating that we will not put up with it. A person has no place in this country if they are targeting innocent Jewish children because of their heritage, their religion and their race. Our Jewish brothers and sisters have a right to feel safe. They are members of the Canadian family. Each and every one of us has a duty to say that enough is enough. We are standing up for our Jewish friends.

Government Orders ·

Business of Supply

In response to a question from Mario Simard

“I have never supported giving public money to businesses. The oil and gas industry does not need government money. It would do well if the government just got out of the way. Also, the Bloc Québécois wants higher taxes to protect culture, but Conservatives want people to keep their money and choose what they want to watch.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, the hon. member should do his research. I have never supported any form of corporate welfare for any industry. I will also let him know that the oil and gas sector is in no need of corporate welfare. It could be very profitable if we could get the government out of the way. Oil companies can pay more and contribute more to our economy, but we would have to get the Liberal government out of the way. Now let us talk about taxes. The Bloc Québécois believes that the only way to protect culture is to increase consumer taxes. Conservatives believe exactly the opposite. We believe that money should stay in consumers’ pockets so they can decide what cultural content and programs they want to watch.

In response to a question from Kevin Lamoureux

“The government gave its broadcast regulator the power to put a tax on streaming, and it has the power to cancel it. The government should stop running away from its own choice. Raising taxes on Canadians does not protect our country. We should lower taxes instead.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, never before in the history of Parliament has someone spoken so much and known so little. He does not even realize that it is impossible for any government agency to raise taxes without the approval of Parliament. Parliament exists today precisely because the Englishmen who created the tradition made it impossible for the Crown to tax what the people had not approved. This is an 800-year-old rule of Parliament. The government has given the legal power to the CRTC to impose a streaming tax and has the legal power to overturn that tax any time it wants. It needs to stop running away from its own policy decisions. The member says he is going to wrap himself in the Canadian flag. Give me a break. We do not defend sovereignty by raising taxes on Canadian consumers. We fight for Canadians by lowering their taxes.

In response to a question from Amarjeet Gill

“I oppose the government's tax increase on streaming services like Netflix. High taxes, debt, and government spending are making life too expensive and driving investment out of Canada. We need to cut taxes on work, investment, and everyday life so people can afford to live.”
  • Speech on a motion

    Respect 97 of 100

    This statement targeted a person rather than their actions or views: “he does not want his personal net worth to depend on the same weak economy, high taxes and red tape he imposes on the…”.

    See full analysis
  • A repeated line

    “After 11 years of the Liberal government.”

    Said 25 times by 19 members since April 30.

    Every time it was said
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I rise today to oppose a new tax on Netflix imposed by the Liberals and supported by the Bloc Québécois. I am rising today to oppose the Liberal Netflix tax increase. We, as Conservatives, want this to be a country bursting with opportunity and promise, a country where young people can again afford homes and start families, where parents can give their kids the best food and the best start to life, and where seniors can retire in peace and tranquility, knowing that they can afford to live out their days, which they worked so hard to prepare for. However, after 10 years of the Liberal government, we have witnessed the biggest decline in the standard of living of any generation since the Great Depression, the first generation of youth who could not afford homes. We have the largest number of Canadians relying on food banks, up over 100% in just seven years, and we have had the worst economic growth in the G7 for over a decade. The Liberals have given us the worst household debt and the worst food price inflation, and instead of changing course, as the Liberal Prime Minister promised in the last election, it turned out that that was all an illusion. It has been more costs, more taxes, more debt and more of the same. He is just another Liberal. How did we get to a point where Canadians cannot afford to live? The answer is governments that block production with taxes and red tape and then print money to fund the resulting shortfall. The easy money is introduced into the economy as debt. Spending more borrowed money faster means higher prices, especially when we are buying fewer produced goods. That has only given Canadians the highest household debt in the G7, a third higher than the second-closest country. Canada’s household debt is now nearing record highs, and that debt is colliding with moderately higher interest rates. This, according to Equifax this week, has led to a point where “insolvency volumes have increased to levels not seen since 2009, up 18.8% year-over-year,” the “delinquency rate climbed 32 per cent year-over-year” and “Q1 saw insolvency rates hit a 17-year high, partly due to escalating financial strain on mortgage holders.” Three million Canadian households will see their mortgages roll over into higher rates over the next two years. The Prime Minister’s inflationary deficits and taxes have forced Canadians to borrow for the essentials. One reason we spend more than we produce is because we do not have enough investment to produce and increase the production of our economy. According to RBC, in a report released about a month ago: Over the past decade, Canada’s net outflow of investment exceeded $1 trillion, the most significant capital exodus in...Canadian history. For every dollar invested in Canada from abroad, two dollars exited. Canada accounted for nearly 10% of global outward foreign direct investment over the past decade, having exported more capital than any country on Earth save [except for] the U.S. and China. These are two economies that are nearly 10 times our size. The Liberal Prime Minister ran away from this economic record, even though he was the adviser who convinced Justin Trudeau to implement it. This Liberal Prime Minister promised that, if he were elected, he would do the opposite of everything he had written about and said, everything his party had done in the preceding decade. We know now that that too was an illusion. It has been more debt, more taxes, more slow growth, more fleeing investment and more of the same. Today, the Liberal Prime Minister was off to New York to expand his favourite export, speeches. Once again, his speech was filled with more of his seemingly sophisticated but highly contradictory buzzwords. On the one hand, he says that we are in the middle of a rupture with the United States, while on the other, he says he wants to, in his words, “make America great again”. His elbows were again flapping up and down in the rhetorical chicken dance, as he cannot seem to decide if integration with the U.S. is a strength or a weakness. He has argued passionately for both positions in the last three months alone. Beyond the illusions, contradictions and the repetitive MBA-isms he states in these buzzword-laden speeches, he is ultimately on exactly the same track. All that matters is the results, not the illusions. Let me go on with the present tense about investment in Canada, according to the RBC report, which says, “Canada now ranks last among G7 nations in investment in both machinery and equipment and intellectual property.” According to Statistics Canada, from the end of the first quarter of 2025 to the last quarter of that same year, overall real business investment dropped by 0.4%, but investment in productive capital fell much more, with industrial machinery and equipment investment down a shocking 15%. The Prime Minister likes to brag about foreign direct investment, claiming that we have taken the most in the world, but Statistics Canada revealed what that was. It was foreign takeovers. These are paper transactions and not investment in new machines or hiring new workers. They are foreign corporations taking control over Canadian companies that are now trading cheap because of our weak dollar and our undervalued business environment. This is not to expand business, but simply to take control out of Canadian hands and put it mostly in American hands. I guess this is what the Prime Minister meant when he said that the Americans wanted to break us to own us. He is ensuring, through his policies, that is happening more and more. According to Statistics Canada, more than half of the total foreign direct investment inflows into Canada were simple paper transactions, mergers and acquisitions. Meanwhile, in the first four quarters of the Prime Minister’s time in office, $109 billion of Canadian investment fled and more than $20 billion more left Canada than came back. That is Canadian dollars building mines, pipelines, businesses and technology abroad, paying foreign workers’ salaries. If the Prime Minister really believes that he had made Canada such an attractive place to invest, then he should look in the mirror and ask why he has invested 90% of his personal assets outside of Canada, most of it in the United States. The answer, of course, is that he does not want his personal net worth to depend on the same weak economy, high taxes and red tape he imposes on the rest of our country. Weirdly, today in his speech, he even encouraged American investors to seek more of our pension fund money. Why on earth would we want the Prime Minister to go to the United States and encourage American investors to pillage our pension funds for investment we desperately need at home? According to Statistics Canada, a majority of Canadian pension fund money is now invested outside of Canada. Another question is: Why, despite the illusions, announcements, grand speeches in fancy foreign settings does investment continue to flee our country and why does it find more attractive welcome around the world? It is because the Liberal Prime Minister has carried on the same policies that he advised Justin Trudeau. Every single antidevelopment law Trudeau brought in remains in place today. The higher taxes on energy, investment and income remain in place. In fact, there are 500 economic projects now awaiting approval by the federal government, and the Prime Minister just announced that he is going to increase the industrial carbon tax sixfold on steel, aluminum, concrete, fertilizer and more. Government greed is again on display with the Liberal-appointed CRTC, using powers under the Liberal Online Streaming Act to triple the Netflix tax to 15%. For Canadians already paying high Liberal inflation on the goods they buy, high Liberal taxes on their paycheques, high Liberal taxes on their gas to get to and from work, and then higher Liberal taxes on the beer they drink to take the edge off when they get home, when they sit down and turn on their favourite program on Netflix, Crave or Disney+, they will again pay higher Liberal taxes to pay for it. The Liberals tax labour, energy, investment, beer, and now, cultural products. We Conservatives want to cut all taxes to make life more affordable for everyone. Today, we rise, as Conservatives, consistent with our overall approach of having a smaller government with bigger citizens, an affordable government for an affordable life. We want to cut taxes, obviously, on work, investment, energy and homebuilding, but we also want to fight this latest Liberal tax hike to give Canadians a break. Let them choose freely what they like to watch when they are at home recreating with their families. Let us get rid of the Netflix tax. Let us make this a country that is based on production and not borrowing, on paycheques and not debt, and on affordability and not exorbitant government inflation. We want to give Canadians back control of their lives with a promising future filled with opportunity. Let us get it done.

Oral Questions ·

The Economy

“Canadians have too much debt, and housing, food, and unemployment are too high. I want the Prime Minister to change his policies so people can afford to pay their bills.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, we have the number one economy in terms of debt for households, the number one economy in the cost of housing and the number one economy in the cost of food inflation. Those are the only metrics on which this government is leading. We are number two when it comes to unemployment, with the unemployment rate being a third higher than in the United States. Now we see the delinquencies and the missed payments leading to a potential bankruptcy crisis, while the Prime Minister sits and hides behind his back bench. Will he stand up, own up, take responsibility and announce the reversal of policies so Canadians can pay their bills?

“Canadians have too much debt and cannot pay their bills because of the Prime Minister. I want him to stop making life harder for them.”
  • Opposition question in Question Period

    Respect 88 of 100

    This statement targeted a person rather than their actions or views: “I know the Prime Minister is very fragile”.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I know the Prime Minister is very fragile. He is not used to taking any difficult questions, but the reality is that Canadians cannot pay their bills. In the first year in office, he has driven up household delinquencies by 18%. He has given Canadians the worst household debt in the G7. Delinquencies have climbed by 32% year over year, and in Q1 we saw a 17-year high due to financial strains in Canadian household finances. Will the Prime Minister get off the backs of Canadians so they can pay their bills?

“I am asking more questions because the Prime Minister only comes once a week and refuses to stand up and answer.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, the reason I am asking a few extra questions is that the Prime Minister only shows up once a week, and he will not get out of his chair and answer them.

“Canadians cannot pay their bills. Our households have the most debt and the highest housing costs in the G7 because the government raised taxes, caused inflation, and blocked projects. I want the Prime Minister to change these policies so people do not lose their homes.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, he is bringing down Canada. It does not help the Canadians who cannot pay their bills for that minister to get up and take credit for projects that were approved 14 years ago, nor does it help when the Prime Minister of Canada refuses to even stand on his feet and defend his disastrous economic record at a time when our households are by far the most indebted anywhere in the G7 because the Liberals block projects, because they have raised taxes and because they have caused inflation and the highest housing costs in the entire group of seven nations. Will the Prime Minister reverse these inflationary policies before Canadians lose their homes?

“Millions of Canadians will soon renew their mortgages at much higher rates, and many are already missing payments. I want the Prime Minister to cut taxes and spending so people do not lose their homes.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, 3.1 million Canadians will renew their mortgages over the next two years into much higher rates after this Liberal government, in particular this Liberal Prime Minister, advised people to take on extra debt with the promise that rates would be low for long. Now, the chickens are coming home to roost, with rate increases that threaten more and more people with the loss of their homes. In the first three months of this year, 1.5 million Canadians missed a payment on a credit card or a mortgage. Will the Prime Minister announce that he is reversing the inflationary high-tax policies so Canadians keep their homes?

“More Canadians are going bankrupt now than at any time since 2009. I want the Prime Minister to stop his spending and debt policies so people do not go broke.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, Canadians are skipping lunch because they cannot afford to pay their bills, while this Prime Minister and the Brookfield class skip their tax bills. Meanwhile, here at home, here is the reality. Equifax is out this week with a new report. This is the organization that checks the credit scores of individual Canadians. It says, “insolvency volumes have increased to levels not seen since 2009”, 18 years ago. Will the Prime Minister announce that he will reverse the inflationary, debt-ridden policies so that Canadians do not go bankrupt?

“Canadians have the highest household debt in the G7, and more people cannot pay their bills. I want the Prime Minister to change his economic plans so Canadians can afford to live.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, come on, the Prime Minister could have done better than that. If he is going to hide under his desk and get someone else to speak in his favour, he has to get something better than that. That was about as good as his economic policies. He owes Canadians answers. The reality is that we have the highest household debt of any G7 country, by far, and we have seen that in the first quarter of this year, there has been a 19% increase in year-over-year delinquencies. Canadians cannot make their minimum payments. Instead of smirking and hiding behind his back bench, will the Prime Minister stand up and announce he will reverse course so Canadians can pay their bills?

“Canadians have more household debt than people in any other G7 country. More people are missing their mortgage payments. Why is this happening if the economy is doing well?”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, the Prime Minister is fond of blaming the rest of the world for the terrible economy he has created here at home, but the other G7 countries face tariffs and high oil prices, and none of them have anywhere near the level of household debt here in Canada. By far, Canadian households, with $1.77 of debt for every dollar of income, are far more indebted than any other country: in fact, a third higher than the second-worst. I quote Equifax: “[The] missed payment level highlights severe financial strain in high-priced markets, with mortgage delinquencies [up] 52 per cent in Ontario and 36 per cent in [B.C.]”. If people are doing so well under his leadership, why are they missing their mortgage payments?

“Rich people are doing well, but everyday Canadians are going broke. Bankruptcies and unpaid bills are way up. Why did 1.5 million Canadians miss an essential payment earlier this year?”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, things are great for the Brookfield class, for those who stash their cash in offshore tax havens and take government handouts, getting rich, but for the rest of Canadians, here is what Equifax says: insolvency volumes have increased to levels not seen since 2009, up 19% year over year; balance delinquency rates climbed 32% year over year; and Q1 saw insolvency volumes hit 17-year highs, partly due to escalating financial strain on mortgage holders. If things are so good and affordable, why is it that 1.5 million Canadians missed at least one essential payment in the first three months of the year?

“Gas is much more expensive now, and Canadian families have the highest debt in the G7. The Prime Minister needs to stop making excuses and change the policies that are causing high prices.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, lots has changed since Harper’s time. Gas prices are more than 40¢ a litre higher, even though the world oil price is actually lower. Now the Prime Minister has made up a new excuse, that there are not enough refineries under his leadership. Maybe he should get out of the way and let refineries build in Canada. We have a Prime Minister who likes to blame the rest of the world. He has given Canadian households the worst debt anywhere in the G7, with delinquencies up 18% year over year. Will the Prime Minister stop making excuses and reverse the inflationary policies before Canadians lose their homes?

Oral Questions ·

Taxation

“Gas costs much more in Canada now than it used to, even though world oil prices are lower. I blame the government's taxes and the weak Canadian dollar for this. I want the Prime Minister to change these policies so people can afford gas.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, there was a world energy crisis, and wars in Syria, Iraq and Ukraine, but at the very moment that oil hit $100 a barrel all around the world, here in Canada it was only $1.38 at the pump. Those were the Harper days in 2014. Today, with oil prices being lower on a worldwide level, gas prices are over 40¢ a litre higher. Those are not world impacts; those are Liberal impacts. Will the Prime Minister reverse his policies of high Liberal taxes and a weak Canadian dollar, so Canadians can afford to fill up at the pump?

“Gas costs 40 cents more per litre now than it did in 2014, even though oil is cheaper. The government's taxes and policies caused this. I want the Prime Minister to change these policies so gas is affordable.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, in 2014, the world was going through an energy crisis. There were wars going on in Syria, Iraq and Ukraine. At the very moment that the price of a barrel of oil was $100, the price at the pump was $1.38. That was 2014, during the Stephen Harper years. Today, the price of oil is lower, but the price at the pump is 40¢ per litre higher. Those are not world impacts. Those are Liberals impacts. Will the Prime Minister reconsider his taxes and policies that are weakening the dollar, so that Canadians can afford to fill up their tanks?

Oral Questions ·

Indigenous Affairs

“The Prime Minister is stopping government lawyers from arguing that private property rights cancel out other land claims. This makes people in British Columbia worry they do not own their homes. I want the Prime Minister to admit he was wrong, let his lawyers make this argument, and protect private property rights in court.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, the Prime Minister is banning his lawyers from making those viable legal arguments, because guideline 14 is still on the federal government’s website. He is the client and is instructing the lawyer not to make the valid legal argument that fee simple private property rights extinguish all other claims. If he makes the same arguments, he will get the same results. Millions of British Columbia homeowners wonder if they even own their home. They are tossing and turning every single night. Will the Prime Minister admit the Liberal government made a mistake, unmuzzle the lawyers, get rid of guideline 14 and put property rights first in court?

“The government told its lawyers not to defend homeowners' property rights in a British Columbia court case, and the judge ruled that Indigenous land claims come first. Now homeowners worry they will lose their homes. I want the Prime Minister to change this rule, let federal lawyers speak, and defend people's property rights.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, litigation guideline 14 was the Liberal government instructing federal lawyers not to defend property rights and argue that they extinguished other claims in the federal Cowichan decision. The judge came forward and said, “Okay,” and agreed that aboriginal title, then, came before homeowners’ property rights in British Columbia. Now seniors and families toss and turn at night, wondering if they even own their homes. Will the Prime Minister reverse course, stop muzzling federal lawyers, revoke guideline 14 and defend property rights in B.C.?

Government Orders ·

Business of Supply

In response to a question from Jeremy Patzer

“The Prime Minister hides his money in tax havens to avoid paying taxes. At the same time, he raises fuel taxes that hurt poor Canadians the most. It is wrong for him to tell regular people to pay more while he dodges his own taxes.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, the Liberal Prime Minister is really rich when he says he cares about making the rich pay their fair share, but stashes his cash in an offshore tax haven. He took his millions of dollars from Brookfield and put them in a Caribbean tax haven in a fake office above a bicycle shop so that he could avoid paying the same taxes he charges Canadians. It is incredible, when we think about how someone who is literally invested in what Toronto Star called the biggest tax-dodger in Canada, Brookfield, then turns around and lectures single moms about paying their taxes when they fill up at the pump. Energy is a much bigger part of the household budget for low-income people than it is for high-income people. That is why these Liberal taxes at the pump hurt the poorest people the most. Liberals turning up their nose at working-class Canadians and telling them to pay more and more while the Prime Minister dodges paying his fair share is the height of Liberal hypocrisy.