MEMBER OF PARLIAMENT

Sophie Chatel

Follow by RSS

Chatel focuses on increasing speed in defense procurement and helping veterans translate their military expertise—including in cybersecurity and aerospace—into civilian careers. She advocates for legislative changes like Bill C-40 to reduce bureaucracy in securing contracts. She often frames these efforts with generalized commitments, stating, “Our role is to recognize veterans’ expertise and translate it into a certification.”Written by AI from their statements. Updated .

Average grade
B+
83 / 100 over 19 statements
Signal 88 / 100
Relevance 72 / 100
Respect 100 / 100
Clarity 81 / 100
Averaged over the 19 of 22 statements graded so far.

In their own words

Statements 22

Government Orders ·

Strengthening Canada's Defence Sector Act

In response to a question from Fraser Tolmie

“We should pass this bill because it will give contracts to Canadian defence companies faster. Combining our expertise will help get contracts out more quickly, especially for the aerospace industry.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Relevance 21 of 100

    None of this reply addressed the specific point raised or the topic under debate.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, my colleague will be voting in favour of Bill C‑40, because its goal is get contracts awarded faster to our defence companies. I want to come back to the aerospace industry. Contracts could easily be awarded. By combining expertise, we could make sure contracts are awarded faster.

In response to a question from Rhéal Éloi Fortin

“Aerospace companies in Quebec need thousands of workers, but our schools cannot train enough people. Veterans have the right skills. We are working to make it easier for veterans to get their military training recognized so they can fill these jobs.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Relevance 43 of 100

    None of this reply addressed the specific point raised or the topic under debate.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, I hope my colleague will agree that aerospace is one of the flagship sectors of Quebec’s economy. I have spoken with companies in the sector, and one Quebec-based SME told me that it could hire 300 people tomorrow morning, but our educational institutions are not currently able to train enough workers to meet the demand for these highly rewarding careers. We have veterans who have acquired these skills, this expertise, and who are simply waiting for those qualifications to be recognized. We are currently working with certain educational institutions to accelerate the recognition of skills acquired in the Canadian Armed Forces so that veterans can step in to fill labour shortages. The aerospace sector alone will need 65,000 new workers over the next 10 years. These are technical trades. Our role is to recognize veterans’ expertise and translate it into a certification that allows them to practise a Red Seal trade and pursue a meaningful career involving a wide range of technologies.

In response to a question from Fraser Tolmie

“Our committee is studying how to help veterans use their military tech skills in civilian jobs. Many leave the forces young and want good new careers. I want all members to support this work.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Relevance 44 of 100

    None of this reply addressed the specific point raised or the topic under debate.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, one thing we are studying at the Standing Committee on Veterans Affairs right now, which is very important for our veterans, is how to recognize the amazing skills they acquired in the forces. The forces now include drones, as I mentioned, cybersecurity, AI, all of those technologies that are so important to the defence sector. When they retire from the forces, they are sometimes as young as 34, and they want a rewarding career after the forces. They want to feel that they are contributing to the service of their country that they love. Our job, and I invite all members to support me, is to help them recognize the skills they acquired in dual-use technology and how they can translate those into civilian jobs so that we can build very rewarding careers for all of our veterans.

“I support this bill. It cuts red tape so the military can buy equipment faster. Buying equipment takes too long right now, which hurts Canadian businesses and stops defence spending from creating local jobs.”
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, I will be sharing my time with the member for Labrador. This is my first opportunity to speak in the House since the tragedy at Canadian Forces Base Wainwright, so I want to begin by offering my deepest condolences to the families and loved ones of those who tragically died in this tragedy. My thoughts are also with those who were injured, their families and the entire community as they grieve and support one another through this difficult time. I rise today to give my full support to Bill C-30, which will transform the way Canada procures military equipment, invests in defence and, above all, builds its domestic defence industry. The Defence Investment Agency was created in October 2025 to speed up military procurement, but transforming it into a Crown corporation could reduce bureaucracy. I will come back to this later, but companies seeking defence contracts face significant challenges. The government has invested billions of dollars in defence, and that is very good. We want to meet NATO’s targets, but we also need to ensure that these investments benefit Canadian businesses and workers. The agency was originally established to modernize defence procurement. That was a very good first step, but it did not go far enough. Bill C-40 will finally give the agency the authority and independence it needs to accelerate the contract awarding process, reduce red tape and better coordinate government efforts. This is very important for accelerating and facilitating SMEs’ access to the defence market. This is a very practical response to the concerns that businesses have shared with us. It is also a way to quickly turn our defence investments into quality jobs for Canadians, innovation, and economic spinoffs at a time when we really need them. I want to focus specifically on the aerospace industry in Quebec and Canada, especially because Quebec’s aerospace industry is a major asset. This summer, I had the pleasure of organizing a round table that brought together both large corporations and SMEs from Quebec’s aerospace and defence industry. Bombardier was there, but so were many other innovative SMEs. In Quebec, we have outstanding expertise, world-class businesses and a network of specialized companies that contribute to our ability to innovate in Canada and around the world in the aerospace industry. During this round table with businesses, one very clear message emerged. One of the biggest obstacles to their growth and ability to secure contracts is the slow, bureaucratic pace of the defence procurement process. Their representatives explained to me that the historic investments we have announced for the defence sector are not automatically translating into jobs and economic spinoffs, because it takes so long to get contracts signed. These contracts are essential if businesses are to invest, hire staff and engage with other suppliers. For example, if Bombardier wins a defence contract, the entire chain of SMEs in Quebec and Canada stands to benefit as a result. The participants also pointed out that SMEs often struggle to access defence tenders, even if the government has already awarded them contracts and their technology is well known. In short, it takes a very long time for contracts to be awarded. Not only do we need to invest in defence, but we also need to ensure that our investments translate quickly into contracts, innovation and well-paying jobs for Canadians. Transforming the Defence Investment Agency is very important for doing that. Not only are we streamlining the processes, but another very aspect is that we are bringing together expertise within the agency to speed up procurement. If we do the right thing with this bill, we will finally be able to respond directly to the main concern expressed by the industry. Our aim is not just to spend more on defence, but to transform these investments into strong, lasting Canadian industrial capabilities that benefit our businesses and our workers, while ensuring the sovereignty of our amazing country. The agency’s core mandate is to combine and build on existing defence procurement expertise within government through a single organization focused on a very specific objective. Rather than duplicate the use of resources, it pools operational knowledge and expertise on procurement contracts in one place. As I said, one of the concerns that was mentioned during the round table was that companies have to explain their expertise or technology to one agency and then turn around and explain it again to another, even after receiving approval. They often have to repeat things twice. Now, everything will come together in a single agency. The agency’s transformation reflects our government’s commitment to build a strong, secure and sovereign Canada. With more autonomy and stronger contractual authority, the agency will finally be able to ease its administrative burden and improve its efficiency and speed, because these investments are needed now. This will strengthen our country’s ability to defend itself while providing more accountability. In February 2026, the unveiling of the first-ever defence industrial strategy marked a key step in modernizing our procurement system. The strategy already called for a whole-of-government approach aimed at strengthening our defence industrial base. We are now seeing the results of this strategy, since we have finally met the NATO defence spending target of 2% of our GDP. We have also reaffirmed our commitment to meeting the NATO target of investing 5% of GDP by 2035. The agency will obviously play a key role in meeting those targets. We are at a hinge moment. Global uncertainty, supply chain disruptions and evolving security challenges have made one thing very clear: Protecting Canadians and safeguarding our sovereignty, our economy and our military capability is what will give us industrial and military strength. Our investments in defence are also a powerful driver of growth for our economy and our innovative sectors. Let us consider just a few examples. Drone technology was developed for defence, but it can also be used in agriculture. Military aerospace innovations benefit the entire aerospace industry. The same is true for shipbuilding and satellites. There is a great company in the Outaouais region, Telesat, that builds satellites. That also benefits AI and cybersecurity. All of these examples show that by working with an effective agency, we will be able to build a strong and sovereign Canada.

Oral Questions ·

Veterans Affairs

In response to a question from Alex Ruff

“The CRA used an independent process to choose who got this contract. It went to a Canadian company in Ontario, and that company hired several veterans to do the work.”
  • Government answer in Question Period

    Relevance 47 of 100

    None of this answer addressed the specific question that was asked.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, as mentioned several times, the CRA allocated the contract based on an independent way of allocating contracts. It is about an independent allocation of the contract to a Canadian company based in Ontario, and among the people hired on that contract, several are veterans.

In response to a question from Alex Ruff

“Our job is to help veterans move into good careers. Many are young and have strong skills in areas like drones and cybersecurity. We want employers to recognize those skills.”
  • Government answer in Question Period

    Relevance 40 of 100

    None of this answer addressed the specific question that was asked.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, yesterday we answered the question about the specific contract, but one thing I want to say to my colleague is what the minister is doing for veterans. Veterans today are, on average, 34 years old, and they have several skills. They work with drones. They work in aerospace. They work with cybersecurity. Our job is to ensure that the transition is successful, because the one thing they have asked for is a meaningful career and for their skill set to be recognized in all sorts of fields.

Government Orders ·

Building Canada Strong Act

In response to a question from Steeve Lavoie

“Businesses lose money and opportunities when the government takes years to make decisions. Companies in Quebec, including in the aerospace industry, told me they need fast and clear answers so they can grow.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, every delay in a decision comes at a cost for businesses. Uncertainty also has a cost for our entrepreneurs. All the businesses I met with in Quebec told me this. They want decisions to be made quickly. When it takes three or four years to make a decision and there is no definitive answer, that has a very clear impact on the predictable growth of our businesses. The aerospace industry, for example, has a great potential for growth in Quebec. However, delays in certain decisions, whether in terms of procurement or starting new projects, have a real cost for businesses in terms of business opportunities.

In response to a question from Costas Menegakis

“We must double our energy production with projects like Churchill Falls, or we will miss out on big economic opportunities. We are also getting things built, like affordable housing in my riding.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Relevance 100 of 100

    Of this reply, 100% addressed the question or point raised.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, there are a number of projects in the energy sector. Of course, we have the Churchill Falls project in Quebec. That is a really critical project for Quebec in terms of energy production. We absolutely must double our energy production. We need to focus on our government’s ability to deliver what Quebeckers and Canadians need when it comes to energy. If we fail to do so, we will be missing out on a very important industrial opportunity. Carrying out a number of projects like the one in Churchill Falls is therefore very important. Although I do not have a list of the shovel-ready projects, there are many. In my riding, for example, we are already starting work on a number of projects to build affordable housing units. I could give him the list. There are several projects, including one in Gracefield, where 39 affordable housing units are being built.

In response to a question from Alexis Deschênes

“This bill does not change the laws in a chosen region. It makes government departments work together so we can review related projects at the same time. The goal is to make one decision for a project within one year, instead of repeating the same reviews.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Relevance 100 of 100

    Of this reply, 100% addressed the question or point raised.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, choosing a region does not necessarily mean changing all the laws that apply to it. The important thing in choosing a region is to truly recognize that there is a critical activity in the sector and that all departments must work together. The purpose of this bill is really to have one submission, one project and one decision in one year. We do not want to duplicate the various decisions. We really want things to be as efficient as possible in a given geographic area. Furthermore, it will not necessarily work on a project-by-project basis. When an area is identified, it really means that a number of projects are related and that they must be considered together.

“I want the House to pass this bill. It cuts red tape and sets a one-year limit to approve major projects. This will fix our supply chains, help our farmers sell goods abroad, and protect our economy from unfair trade pressure.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I rise in the House today to speak to Bill C‑39, the building Canada strong act. It contains important legislative changes that are part of our government’s effort to protect Canada’s economic future by reducing red tape across the supply chain, including in transportation. Last year, our government passed the Building Canada Act, which dramatically expedited projects of national interest, removed internal trade barriers and ensured labour mobility. Over the past few months, we have worked diligently to ensure that the review of all projects, not just those previously covered by Bill C‑5, will be approve within a time frame that meets Canadians’ expectations. They expect their government to be efficient, and Bill C‑39 gives them a reasonable one-year timeline. A year to get a project approved is plenty. These days, with our economy facing headwinds, we have to be efficient. We want to streamline government procedures and ensure that guardrails are in place when we accelerate project reviews and lower costs. We know that every delay in the approval process and every duplicate decision comes at a high cost to our businesses, and in the present circumstances, their patience is wearing thin. Obviously, the global economic environment we face is different than the one we knew following the post-Cold War era. For a long time, our economy had the wind in its sails. Conditions with our southern neighbours were extremely steady. Access to the U.S. market was also freer within the North American trade environment, and the rules were understood and obeyed. Unfortunately, our businesses no longer operate in this environment. It is therefore absolutely essential that we act now through what remains within our control. Obviously, we have no control over what happens south of the border, but we can control what happens here, at home. We have long been told that we must become efficient. We have talked a lot about our supply chains. Unfortunately, our neighbours to the south are using our supply chains as tools of coercion and turning our economic dependencies into a strategic vulnerability. In this rapidly changing world, our new Government of Canada is focusing, as I said earlier, on what we can control, including diversifying our markets to build a much stronger Canada. Transportation is a vital link between all of our other priorities. We cannot diversify our markets and trade to build the strongest economy in the G7 without strengthening our transportation network. By strengthening it, we will, of course, strengthen our competitiveness across all sectors. We are going to build Canada strong through Canada’s trade corridors that connect our Canadian businesses to markets and supply chains across the country and around the world. Indigenous peoples, transportation industry representatives and Canadians often tell us that to build stronger, more efficient and more resilient supply chains, we need to cut red tape, strengthen supply chains, accelerate infrastructure development and attract the investments needed to grow our economy. At the end of the day, when our businesses are doing well and are no longer facing unnecessary barriers, job creation matters in Canada. Affordability always starts with a good, well-paying job. Red tape and an insufficiently competitive tax system hinder our businesses’ innovation and productivity. With this bill, we want to modernize our business environment and make Canada one of the best countries in the world in which to invest. This needs to be addressed urgently. Yes, we have challenges, but we also have opportunities. If we want to seize those opportunities, we obviously need a regulatory framework that allows us to do so. That is why we are modernizing the rules for getting projects built and making real investments in the infrastructure Canada needs to compete in this new environment. That does not mean that we do not want to put protections in place. Canadians are asking us to build fast, create jobs, support our economy and build Canada strong, but we must also protect them. They are not asking us for one or the other; they are asking us for both. This bill is in line with the regulatory framework we are already operating under. I just mentioned red tape. Federal departments and agencies have identified more than 500 recent initiatives and proposed measures to reduce the administrative burden. This bill therefore allows our federal agencies to begin implementing some of those initiatives. This will demonstrate how Canada intends to fulfill its commitments to remove the barriers that slow private investment, limit trade and labour mobility, and of course, restrict business productivity. We have made strategic, and indeed historic, investments to build Canada strong. We have introduced a number of strategies and made historic investments, as I just said. If we do not address persistent constraints, such as the administrative burden and the transportation system, we cannot maximize Canadians’ investment in their economy. We need to maximize the return on every dollar Canadians invest in their economy. That is what we are doing with this bill, which is essential to making every dollar more productive. Since I am running out of time, I want to get right to the issue of farmers. I am member from the Outaouais, which is a very prosperous region. We have corn, soybean and canola farmers, for example, who are among the most competitive in the world, but they have to be able to get their grain, soybeans or canola to international markets. This bill will ensure that our roads are efficient, our rail system is reliable and our ports are able to quickly process essential goods. Every link in the chain is important, and when one of them is slowing things down, costs increase and our farmers’ competitiveness decreases. Investing in transportation infrastructure is a direct investment in the competitiveness of our farmers. In addition to agriculture, Pontiac—Kitigan Zibi also has a large number of food processors, people in the agri-food sector as well as in the technology and manufacturing sectors. That is important. We want to diversify our markets and provide opportunities for the people in these sectors, but again we need solid and effective infrastructure. In closing, I would just like to add that the digitalization of all of the documents that must be submitted to the various government departments to send goods to the international market is crucial. The digitalization of documents is an important part of this bill.

Statements by Members ·

News Media Award Recipient

“I want to congratulate Trevor Greenway, a local newspaper editor, for winning a national award. He won it for his reporting on mental health and suicide among men in our community. Local journalism matters, and I thank him for his work.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I rise today to recognize Trevor Greenway, editor-in-chief of The Low Down to Hull and Back News in Wakefield. Trevor won first place at the Canadian Community Newsmedia Awards for his powerful reporting on health and suicide in the Gatineau hills, in particular among men. Mental health is important, and his reporting gave a voice to grieving families and shone a light on the barriers people still face today when seeking help. This award confirms something our community has known for a long time: Local journalism matters. Congratulations to Trevor for his well-deserved national recognition. I thank Trevor for giving a voice to our community.

Oral Questions ·

The Economy

In response to a question from Gabriel Hardy

“Our government is helping people in the other member's riding. We are funding local infrastructure, helping build more homes, and bringing a school food program there.”
  • Government answer in Question Period

    Relevance 45 of 100

    None of this answer addressed the specific question that was asked.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, during my visit, I also met with the reeve of the Charlevoix RCM. He supports many of the government’s affordability measures. Our measures mean more municipal infrastructure. Our strategic investments in infrastructure will support the creation of more housing in my colleague’s region. In addition, children will have access to the school food program, which is set to be rolled out in schools in my colleague’s riding. I hope he sees that we are working hard for the people in his riding.

In response to a question from Gabriel Hardy

“Our plan for food security will make food cheaper and create jobs in food processing, including in the member's own riding.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I had the pleasure of visiting Charlevoix, in my colleague’s riding, to meet with farmers and food processors. This beautiful region is joining together to make life more affordable for the people of Charlevoix and the surrounding areas. We are going to make the food more affordable by working together through the national food security strategy. We will create jobs in my colleague’s region throughout the processing sector. Laiterie Charlevoix and others will benefit from this.

Statements by Members ·

Milestones in Pontiac—Kitigan Zibi

“I want to congratulate Otter Lake on its 150th anniversary and Litchfield on its 175th anniversary. I am thanking the hard-working people who built and continue to shape these communities.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, our rural communities are built on strong values: helping each other, working hard and coming together when times are difficult. These values are passed down from generation to generation. This year, we are proud to celebrate two milestones in Pontiac—Kitigan Zibi: the 150th anniversary of Otter Lake and the 175th anniversary of Litchfield. Since the early days of their existence, these two wonderful communities have grown thanks to the families, entrepreneurs, workers and community leaders who have dedicated themselves to making our beautiful community a great place to live. Today we are celebrating their history, but above all, we are celebrating the people who have built those communities and who continue to shape their history every single day.

Oral Questions ·

The Economy

In response to a question from Kyle Seeback

“Our $3.2-billion food plan will make food cheaper for Canadians. We will build local facilities, grow more food year-round, process it here, and create jobs.”
  • Government answer in Question Period

    Relevance 100 of 100

    Of this answer, 100% addressed the question that was asked.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, stakeholders across Canada are saying that this $3.2-billion strategy on food security will make food affordable for Canadians. There will be four key strategies. We will build local, regional infrastructure so that we have more options and more affordability. We will produce more. We will transform more of our own food here in Canada. We will create more jobs, and we will grow, all year long, fruits and vegetables.

In response to a question from Jason Groleau

“Farmers in Quebec support our food strategy. We can make food cheaper for families by processing more of it in Canada. We are spending $3.2 billion on the country's food supply chain.”
  • Government answer in Question Period

    Relevance 32 of 100

    None of this answer addressed the specific question that was asked.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I had the opportunity to travel all over Quebec last summer and to meet with farmers in my colleague’s region. I can say one thing. Farmers are very happy with the national food security strategy. One way to make food more affordable for Canadian families is to do more processing here in Canada. We are investing $3.2 billion in the food supply chain in Quebec and across Canada.

In response to a question from Joël Godin

“We will spend $1 billion to process more food in Canada instead of sending it abroad. This will lower grocery prices and put more Canadian food on store shelves.”
  • Government answer in Question Period

    Relevance 100 of 100

    Of this answer, 100% addressed the question that was asked.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, my colleague is well aware that the national food security strategy will lower the cost of groceries. More specifically, we will invest $1 billion to boost food processing here in Canada. Right now, we are sending our agricultural products abroad for processing. Now, we will invest in this sector. That will give Canadians more choice, put more Canadian foods on grocery stores shelves and make groceries a lot more affordable for Canadian families.

In response to a question from Joël Godin

“The Prime Minister announced a new food plan yesterday. It will help grow and process more food in Canada, cut rules, and bring down grocery prices.”
  • Government answer in Question Period

    Relevance 100 of 100

    Of this answer, 100% addressed the question that was asked.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I have some good news for my colleague. Yesterday, the Prime Minister announced Canada’s national food security strategy. This strategy is built on four key pillars: investing in our regional food infrastructure to increase choice and competition, processing more food here in Canada, increasing year-round production of fruits and vegetables, and cutting red tape. That is how we will put more Canadian food on the table and bring down the cost of groceries.

Oral Questions ·

The Economy

In response to a question from Tamara Kronis

“The Prime Minister is helping Canadians through hard economic times. He cut taxes for 22 million people, started a school food program, and plans to do more to help families afford food.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, talking about seriousness, Canadians know we are in the middle of a global economic disruption. Our Prime Minister is a serious person. He is working hard. He already cut taxes for 22 million Canadians. He also launched the national school food program, which helps families with affordability. In addition, he proposed to launch very soon a national food security strategy, which will really help families during this time of crisis.

Oral Questions ·

International Trade

In response to a question from David Bexte

“The Mercosur trade deal involves a huge market, but we are listening to Canadian farmers and ranchers who have concerns about it. A committee is studying the deal now, and we will protect our farmers.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, the Mercosur agreement represents 300 million people and a $2.5-trillion economy. It is one of the largest markets in the world. However, we listened to our ranchers. We listened to our producers. We are listening to their concerns about the trade agreement. In fact, the study is going on at committee. We will continue to be there for our farmers because they work hard to put food on our tables.