Canadian Identity and Culture

During question period on Canadian identity and culture, the Bloc Québécois asked whether the Prime Minister would reinstate the digital services tax and require large tech companies to contribute to Canadian and Quebec culture, saying the government had dropped these contributions to appease the American President and that the strategy had not worked. The Prime Minister replied that the government is committed to Canadian culture, the French language and Quebec culture, that cultural investments are at their highest level ever, and that it does not want new taxes that raise costs. The Bloc said such corporate contributions do not increase costs for users and that Europe takes a similar approach; the Prime Minister said American attempts to restrict French language and Canadian culture had failed and that the government would continue to protect and promote them.Written by AI from the debate. Updated .

Official text (opens in a new tab)

5 statements

Yves-François Blanchet, Beloeil—Chambly

Bloc Québécois
“The Prime Minister stopped big tech companies from paying taxes and funding our arts to please the American president. That plan failed. I want to know if the Prime Minister will bring back the digital services tax and make these companies support our culture.”
  • Opposition question in Question Period

    Respect 53 of 100

    This statement targeted a person rather than their actions or views: “simply to appease the American President”.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, the Prime Minister personally cancelled contributions of any kind by tech giants to the economy or the arts in Quebec and Canada, including through taxes or content creation, simply to appease the American President. The effort fell flat. Although I remain unconvinced, the Prime Minister claims to have walked away from the negotiation table for language and culture-related reasons. Since the effort failed, should the Prime Minister consider reinstating the digital services tax and allowing cultural contributions by the web giants?

Mark Carney, Prime Minister

Liberal
“We support Canadian culture, the French language, and Quebec culture. We are spending more money on them than ever before, and we will keep doing so. We do not need new taxes that make life more expensive to pay for it.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, like the member for Beloeil—Chambly, this government is deeply committed to Canadian culture, to the French language and to Quebec culture. That is why investments in the cultural sector have never been higher in Canada’s history. We are going to strengthen these investments, but specific taxes that impact affordability for Canadians will not be necessary.

Yves-François Blanchet, Beloeil—Chambly

Bloc Québécois
“I worked in culture for 20 years. Making big tech companies help pay for culture does not raise costs for users, and that money helps Quebec and Canada. Europe already does this. The Prime Minister's policy is not working, and he should rethink it.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I want to add two points. First, I was in the cultural sector for 20 years in a professional capacity. I know a thing or two about it. Second, corporate contributions have no impact on the cost for users because they are investments the companies would have made anyway. They are funnelled into Quebec and Canada. Given that the Prime Minister wants to build closer ties with Europe, which places great importance on the contribution of businesses and Internet giants to culture, should he not reconsider his policy, which is not working?

Yves-François Blanchet, Beloeil—Chambly

Bloc Québécois
“The Prime Minister failed to please the American president. He should change his mind and make big web companies pay their share to support our arts and culture, especially in French.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, given the frequency of attendance here, I will take this as a great sign of respect for the voters and citizens of Quebec and Canada. In my view, the Prime Minister has failed in his strategy to appease the American President. In light of this failure, he should reconsider his decision, which we would welcome, so that the web giants, which are wealthier than some countries around the world, pay their fair share to support the vitality of culture and the arts in Canada and Quebec, especially in French.

Mark Carney, Prime Minister

Liberal

Linked statement

“The Americans tried to limit the French language and Canadian culture, but they failed. We protected both, and we will keep supporting them.”
  • Government answer in Question Period

    Relevance 100 of 100

    Of this answer, 100% addressed the question that was asked.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, the Americans are the ones who failed. They failed in their attempts to place restrictions on the French language and on Canadian culture. We protected the French language and Canadian culture, and we will continue to promote them.

Discussion

No comments yet

See the full discussion

Comment rules

More from sitting 140

  1. PRIVATE MEMBERS' BUSINESS National Framework on Skilled Trades and Labour Mobility Act 6 statements
  2. Government Orders Commissioner for Modern Treaty Implementation Act 54 statements
  3. Oral Questions Public Safety 2 statements
  4. Oral Questions Canadian Identity and Culture 5 statements
  5. Oral Questions The Economy 6 statements
  6. Oral Questions Taxation 2 statements
  7. Oral Questions Air Transportation 4 statements
  8. Oral Questions The Economy 5 statements
  9. Oral Questions Housing 4 statements
  10. Oral Questions Seniors 2 statements
  11. Oral Questions The Economy 2 statements
  12. Oral Questions International Trade 20 statements
  13. Oral Questions Automotive Industry 5 statements
  14. Oral Questions The Economy 6 statements
  15. Government Orders Commissioner for Modern Treaty Implementation Act 35 statements
  16. Oral Questions The Economy 10 statements
  17. Government Orders Commissioner for Modern Treaty Implementation Act 36 statements
  18. Oral Questions Rail Transportation 2 statements
  19. Oral Questions Small Business 4 statements
  20. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  21. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  22. Oral Questions Labour 2 statements
  23. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements