Business of Supply

A Conservative supply motion asking the House to condemn the government’s economic record and call for a change in economic policies, citing a recession, weak growth projections from the Parliamentary Budget Officer and banks, and missed fiscal targets. Conservatives argued Canada has the second-worst unemployment rate in the G7, that job losses and high food, fuel and housing costs are hurting Canadians, and that the government should step back and scrap laws that slow development. Liberals replied that banks and economists do not support the recession claim, pointed to a strong job market and to measures like the grocery rebate, and described government investments in members’ ridings. Bloc members questioned spending $34 billion on an oil pipeline while claiming climate leadership, criticized the Alto high-speed rail project’s cost and ridership estimates, and asked for the government’s trade negotiating plans. Part of the time went to procedural exchanges over an apology demanded from one member and to members describing local unemployment and cost-of-living conditions in their ridings.Written by AI from the debate. Updated .

Official text (opens in a new tab)

68 statements

Bob Zimmer, Prince George—Peace River—Northern Rockies

Conservative
“The Northwest Territories economy is struggling under the Liberals, with recessions in six different years. I want the member to answer: Is the Northwest Territories in a recession, yes or no?”
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, I just want to bring up to the member across the way that his government has been in power for the last 11 years, and the Northwest Territories should be one of the powerful cylinders in our economic engine, but it is seriously misfiring. The Northwest Territories was in a recession in six of the years since the Liberals formed government: 2016, 2019, 2020, 2022, 2024 and 2025, after job-killing Liberal policies were enacted by the previous prime minister and the current Prime Minister. The current Prime Minister does not seem to be wanting to fix it either. He just turned 30% of the Northwest Territories into a park. My question for the member is this: Is the Northwest Territories in recession, yes or no?

Ryan Turnbull, Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Finance and National Revenue and to the Secretary of State (Canada Revenue Agency and Financial Institutions)

Liberal
“The Conservatives are wrong to say our economy is failing. Banks and economic experts say our job market is strong and we are not in a recession.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Relevance 40 of 100

    None of this reply addressed the specific point raised or the topic under debate.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, we have heard from the banks, the C.D. Howe Institute and Desjardins. The Conservatives seem to love to talk down the Canadian economy and Canadian workers, and to jump prematurely into a narrative that they then, by the end of the week, find out is untrue. However, the Bank of Montreal has said that the solid May jobs report “should silence the recession crowd”. RBC has said there are still signs that labour markets are broadly improving. The C.D. Howe Institute says the latest job figures show that it is too soon to use that label based solely on a pair of small quarterly contractions in the economy. Desjardins says, “according to our analysis, the Canadian economy”—

Bob Zimmer, Prince George—Peace River—Northern Rockies

Conservative
“The question was about the Northwest Territories, not this topic.”
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, I rise on a point of order. The question was about the Northwest Territories—

Ryan Turnbull, Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Finance and National Revenue and to the Secretary of State (Canada Revenue Agency and Financial Institutions)

Liberal
“I was answering the member's question. The opposition's motion says things that are not true, and they should look at the facts from Canadian economic reports instead.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Relevance 16 of 100

    None of this reply addressed the specific point raised or the topic under debate.

    See full analysis
  • Reply to a debate question

    Respect 32 of 100

    This statement targeted a person rather than their actions or views: “I am sure the member opposite is actually concerned with facts and figures”.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, I was answering the hon. member’s question. It pertained to the opposition day motion, which is claiming a number of things that are completely untrue. I am sure the member opposite is actually concerned with facts and figures given by Canadian financial institutions that do economics reports.

Emma Harrison, Peterborough

Liberal
“Can my colleague explain the grocery rebate? How many people qualify for it, and how will it help Canadians right now?”
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, I was hoping that my colleague could further elaborate on the Canadian grocery and essentials benefit. How many people qualify for that, and what does it mean for Canadians from coast to coast to coast in this time of uncertainty?

Ryan Turnbull, Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Finance and National Revenue and to the Secretary of State (Canada Revenue Agency and Financial Institutions)

Liberal
“We cut government operational spending by $60 billion over five years. This gave us the money to cut taxes and give 12 million families money for groceries and essentials. We are giving people this short-term help while still investing in the economy.”
  • A repeated line

    “We introduced the Canada groceries and essentials benefit.”

    Said 29 times by 19 members since April 23.

    Every time it was said
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, that is a great question, and I appreciate the opportunity to talk more about the affordability measures the government has put forward. Obviously, we have cut back and have found optimization within the federal public service. We have reduced operational spending by $60 billion over five years, creating fiscal room both to make generational investments and to offer tax deductions and tax cuts, but we have also protected and, in fact, added federal benefits. We added the groceries and essentials benefit, which went out last Friday to 12 million Canadian families. This is good news. I have heard anecdotally from residents of my riding that they have received upward of $500 in their bank accounts. That is going to help. It is short-term, temporary, targeted support, which is exactly what the Governor of the Bank of Canada said at committee is needed, in a time of crisis when we do not know how long the oil price shock is going to last. We know that Canadian families are struggling. That is why we keep stepping up with affordability measures that will help them get through the challenging times, while we are building a stronger, more resilient economy, making the investments that are needed, attracting private investment and ensuring that we have growth for generations to come.

Rhonda Kirkland, Oshawa

Conservative

Linked statement

“The member acts like everything is fine, but it is not. He needs to talk to real people in his riding and nearby towns to see how hard life actually is.”
  • Question or comment in debate

    Respect 69 of 100

    This statement targeted a person rather than their actions or views: “what he is gaslighting them to make them think it is”.

    See full analysis
  • Question or comment in debate

    Signal 30 of 100

    Much of this statement went to praise, blame, greetings, routine procedure or general stories rather than reasons, requests or specific points.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, it is a wonder the way the member is talking, making it sound as though everything is just fine and there is nothing to see here. He suggests that our government is doing all the things and that everyone is getting everything they need. It is more gaslighting from a narcissistic partner than I have ever heard in my life. The member clearly is not living in the real world. Perhaps he needs to come down from the clouds and talk to constituents in his riding. I know it has been a while, maybe, since he was there. I am pretty sure he does not live there anymore. Perhaps he should talk to them and to folks in Whitby, Clarington and Oshawa about what they are really struggling with, because the day-to-day reality is harder than what he is gaslighting them to make them think it is.

Ryan Turnbull, Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Finance and National Revenue and to the Secretary of State (Canada Revenue Agency and Financial Institutions)

Liberal
“I have made many announcements in the member's riding, including funding for women's shelters. She was never there.”
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, this gives me the opportunity to point out many of the announcements I have happened to make in the member’s riding. We have helped women’s shelters in her riding. She was nowhere to be found—

Ryan Turnbull, Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Finance and National Revenue and to the Secretary of State (Canada Revenue Agency and Financial Institutions)

Liberal
“The member's party voted against housing and school food programs. Our government gave $1 billion over five years to feed kids at school, including in her riding.”
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, her party voted against the national housing strategy. It did not support those organizations. What about the national school food program? Our government put in $1 billion over five years and then made that program permanent. I have gone and seen that program deliver food to kids who badly need it in her riding—

Mark Gerretsen, Kingston and the Islands

Liberal
“The member for Oshawa yelled, 'That is a lie.' That is against the rules. I want you to make her take it back.”
  • Question or comment in debate

    Relevance 0 of 100

    None of this question addressed the preceding speech or the topic under debate.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, I am sure you heard it. In that exchange, the member for Oshawa yelled, “That is a lie.” I am sorry. The neighbouring member for York—Durham thinks that is funny. The member for Oshawa yelled, “That is a lie.” She should know that is unparliamentary. I would respectfully request that you ask her to withdraw that comment.

Rhonda Kirkland, Oshawa

Conservative
“I was shouting across the room, not standing to speak. What the member said about me is not true. I always support Oshawa.”
  • Question or comment in debate

    Relevance 0 of 100

    None of this question addressed the preceding speech or the topic under debate.

    See full analysis
  • Question or comment in debate

    Signal 22 of 100

    Much of this statement went to praise, blame, greetings, routine procedure or general stories rather than reasons, requests or specific points.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, I was not standing to speak. I was shouting across, like we often do. I am sorry that it was heard, but it is categorically untrue what he said. I am always there for Oshawa—

Mark Gerretsen, Kingston and the Islands

Liberal
“Our rules do not let members call someone a liar. The member for Oshawa must take back what she said and make a full apology.”
  • Question or comment in debate

    Relevance 0 of 100

    None of this question addressed the preceding speech or the topic under debate.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, the member for Oshawa is not recognizing the fact that what she said was wrong. At best, she was sorry that it was heard. The rules in the House are very clear. We cannot accuse someone of lying, much less call them a liar. The member needs to withdraw the comment and apologize for what she said without qualification or any caveat attached to it.

Rhonda Kirkland, Oshawa

Conservative
“I take back saying the word "lie," but what was said is not true.”
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, I withdraw saying, “That is a lie,” but it was categorically untrue.

Mark Gerretsen, Kingston and the Islands

Liberal
“The member must take back her comment and apologize without making excuses. She has refused to respect your authority twice now.”
  • Question or comment in debate

    Relevance 0 of 100

    None of this question addressed the preceding speech or the topic under debate.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, we have seen twice now that the member is refusing to recognize your authority, because she is once again adding a caveat to it and saying, “I apologize, but”. She has to unreservedly remove the comment and apologize for what she said.

Steeve Lavoie, Beauport—Limoilou

Liberal
“Canada's economy is doing well, despite what the opposition says. We are creating jobs, wages are growing faster than prices, and our banks are strong. I do not agree with the motion.”
  • A repeated line

    “We are going to build the strongest economy in the G7.”

    Said 15 times by 6 members since April 23.

    Every time it was said
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, I am grateful for the opportunity to speak today. When I read the motion today, I could not help but think of a story my father told me when I was a kid. The story had to do with Optimist clubs. There are Optimist clubs in Quebec and in just about every province in Canada, and they are really essential to the community. They work hard. I am thinking in particular of the clubs in Beauport—Limoilou that sell hot dogs at baseball tournaments and donate the proceeds to young people. Everyone knows about the Optimist clubs in their community. When I was young, my father told me a little story to make me think. Given the success of the Optimist clubs, he told me a story about two guys. The first one tells the other that since Optimist clubs seem to work so well, they should start a “pessimist club”. The second replies that he does not think it will work. When I read the motion, it reminded me a bit of that story, and I will explain why. I think it is important to put some facts back into the debate today. Yes, the global economy is undergoing a period of uncertainty. Yes, the challenges are real. However, presenting Canada as an economic failure is more pessimism than a serious analysis. The fact of the matter is that Canada is still in a great economic position today compared to many of its G7 partners. Canada is expected to have the second-fastest growth in the G7 this year and next. Our banking system, in which I worked for more than 20 years, is recognized as one of the strongest in the world. Our unemployment rate remains historically low despite global economic turbulence. Millions of jobs have been created since the pandemic, and Canada continues to attract major investments in growth sectors such as critical minerals, artificial intelligence, batteries, aerospace and clean technology. Let us not forget the fundamental fact that Canada and the United States share the world’s longest international border. This proximity gives us privileged access to the world’s largest economy. Billions of dollars’ worth of goods and services cross that border every day, supporting millions of jobs on both sides. Few G7 countries enjoy such a significant advantage in terms of geography and trade. However, this advantage also comes with its share of challenges. When the American economy slows down, when trade tensions emerge or when political decisions are made in Washington, the effects are felt here in Canada right away. Our level of economic integration with the United States leaves us more exposed than many other countries to the ups and downs of the U.S. economy and the uncertainties of its trade policies. That is precisely why we must look at our economic performance in context and with a positive outlook. Despite the economic upheaval in recent years, the supply chain disruptions, the rising global inflation and the uncertainty when it comes to our main trading partner, Canada remains one of the most stable and resilient economies in the G7. That is why we need to assess Canada’s economic performance rigorously and honestly. What do the numbers tell us? They tell us that Canada’s economy is stronger and more resilient that many people expected. The May labour force survey results show that our plan is working. While several analysts had predicted that only 10,000 jobs would be created, we actually created 88,000 jobs in one month. That is unbelievable. That is not a small difference. It is almost nine times what the market expected. The unemployment rate also dropped to 6.6% from a high of 7.1% last August. These numbers demonstrate one very simple thing: Despite headwinds, global uncertainty and trade tensions with our main economic partner, Canada’s labour market remains resilient. What is more, over the past 12 months, Canada has created 147,000 jobs. Since December 2024, Canada has added more jobs per capita than the United States. Canada has created 2.8 jobs for every 1,000 residents, nearly double the rate seen among our neighbours to the south. These are results we can be proud of. It is not just the number of jobs that matters. The quality of the jobs matters too. The recent gains have mainly come from full-time jobs, particularly in the construction industry. Why is that so important? It is because it shows that the investments we are making are in infrastructure, housing and major economic projects that deliver real results. That is good news for the people and the riding of Beauport—Limoilou. It also shows that our decision to align our public investments more closely with the construction season is paying off. Meanwhile, wages continue to rise faster than inflation. For over three years now, workers’ incomes have been outpacing price increases. That means more money in the pockets of Canadian families. That is the reality for millions of workers across the country. Of course, there are still some challenges. I am thinking in particular about youth employment. Although youth unemployment is down by 0.9%, marking the first drop since January, we know that many young Canadians are still having a hard time entering the labour market. That is why our government is taking action. In the spring economic update, we announced over $6 billion in investments in our team Canada strong initiative. This initiative will mobilize Canada’s skilled trades workforce and meet the growing needs of our economy. Thanks to these investments, we expect to create more than 100,000 new, well‑paying jobs in the skilled trades by 2030. We are making it easier to access apprenticeships. We are supporting training. We are helping young people find stable, well‑paying jobs that are in demand across the country. We are continuing to protect essential programs like Canada summer jobs and the youth climate corps. The opposition is asking us today to conclude that the Canadian economy is failing. The facts tell a very different story. They show us an economy that continues to add jobs despite global uncertainty. They show us wages rising faster than inflation. They show us investments that are boosting construction and strengthening our productive capacity. They show us a country that remains one of the strongest economies in the G20 despite global challenges. Our government remains focused on a clear priority: building the strongest economy in the G7. That is the goal of budget 2025. That is the goal of the spring economic update. That is the goal of every measure we are implementing to support workers, attract investment, and strengthen Canada’s competitiveness. Canadians are asking us not to give in to pessimism. They want us to build the future. That is exactly what we are doing. Our free trade agreements with Europe and the Indo‑Pacific region have made Canada one of the best-positioned countries in the world for international trade. The real question is this: Are we in a better position to weather this storm than most of our international partners? The answer is yes, because we have strong institutions, strategic natural resources that are in demand all over the world, and access to over 1.5 billion consumers through our trade agreements and, most of all, because we can count on Canadians’ talent, innovation and resilience. Rather than giving into pessimism, we have to acknowledge the challenges yet trust in the incredible strengths of our economy and the immense potential of Canadians. That is exactly what our government is focused on doing: investing in productivity, infrastructure, housing, trade and the workers building our collective prosperity. I, for one, am siding with the optimists.

Kevin Lamoureux, Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons

Liberal
“The Conservatives are misleading Canadians about job losses and exports. They always talk down the country. I want my colleague to speak about how Canada is actually growing.”
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, part of the concern I have about the Conservatives’ opposition day is that, consistent with what they usually do, they are misleading Canadians. With the first two speakers, we had one member stand up and say there has been a net loss in jobs since this Prime Minister became the Prime Minister, which is just not true, and then another member stood up and said export numbers are going in the wrong direction. Again, it is just not true. Implying that Canada is constantly broken is something the Conservatives are very good at doing, and they seem to take great glee in talking down Canada. I wonder if my colleague could talk about what he believes is important in terms of how Canada is, in fact, growing and things are getting better in many different areas.

Steeve Lavoie, Beauport—Limoilou

Liberal
“Canada has plenty of energy and minerals, and trade deals give us access to 1.5 billion customers around the world. Even though times are tough, our plan to grow the economy and bring in investment is setting us up well for the future.”
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, I see that my colleague is part of the optimists’ club too. I am glad about that, and I am sure we will make something good out of it. Canada is truly a superpower when it comes to clean and conventional energy. We have vast deposits of critical minerals, so we are well equipped. I see this because I am a member of the Standing Committee on International Trade. I have seen the agreements we are signing all over the world. As I mentioned earlier, that is nearly 1.5 billion consumers worldwide we can do business with. There is no doubt that by diversifying our economy and continuing to attract investment here, we are truly laying the groundwork for the future, and people know it. People know we are going through some rough times right now, but they still believe in us, and we really feel that.

Grant Jackson, Brandon—Souris

Conservative
“The Liberals claim Conservatives hate Canada, but that is not true. We are pointing out where the government has failed. More Canadians than ever cannot afford food or buy a home under this government.”
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, there are a few disturbing comments on the record already, unfortunately, early this Monday, from the government whip and the parliamentary secretary to the government House leader. I find it very unfortunate that they continue to accuse Conservatives of hating Canada. I love this country, and the member for Winnipeg North knows that. I find it very disturbing that he continues to accuse us of rightfully calling out the government where it has failed over the last 11 years. There are more Canadians at food banks than ever before, including educated Canadians with post-secondary degrees, more than ever, lining up at food banks because their jobs do not pay them enough to pay for the increase in food prices under the Liberals. There are more Canadians under 35 out of the housing market than ever before. What exactly is it that the Liberals think they have to be so proud of?

Steeve Lavoie, Beauport—Limoilou

Liberal
“We need to work together to build a strong country. The opposition parties say they want to help, but they vote against programs for dental care and groceries. I want them to support these programs instead.”
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, I am not sure that question was actually directed at me, but I will take the time to answer it. During my speech, I recounted a story my father used to tell me when I was young, a story about optimists and pessimists. The whole idea is that if we want to build a strong Canada, if we want to look to the future, we have to be part of the optimists’ club. If we are pessimists, we will get nowhere together, and the word “together” will cease to exist. That is what we are building, and it saddens me to see members of the opposition parties saying one thing in the House and then doing another. I am talking about voting against measures that help, such as the Canadian dental care plan and the Canada groceries and essentials benefit. I would like to see them join us on the optimistic side.

Jean-Denis Garon, Mirabel

Bloc Québécois
“I want the member to explain how Canada can be a clean energy leader while spending 34 billion dollars on an oil pipeline. I want to know if he thinks that is clean.”
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, I would like to extend greetings to my colleague. We work very well together on the Standing Committee on Finance. As he said, he spent 20 years in banking. I would like to know whether he and his fellow optimists believe that spending $34 billion on a pipeline for the dirtiest oil in the world and funding a new pipeline forms part of what he referred to in his comments as Canada’s strategy to become a clean energy superpower. I would like to know whether the optimists consider that to be clean.

Discussion

No comments yet

See the full discussion

Comment rules

More from sitting 131

  1. Private Members' Business The Criminal Code 6 statements
  2. Government Orders Business of Supply 68 statements
  3. Oral Questions The Economy 12 statements
  4. Oral Questions Canadian Identity and Culture 6 statements
  5. Oral Questions The Economy 14 statements
  6. Oral Questions Health 4 statements
  7. Oral Questions The Economy 10 statements
  8. Oral Questions Youth 2 statements
  9. Oral Questions The Economy 10 statements
  10. Oral Questions Health 8 statements
  11. Oral Questions Public Safety 6 statements
  12. Oral Questions Indigenous Affairs 2 statements
  13. Oral Questions Employment 4 statements
  14. Oral Questions The Economy 2 statements
  15. Government Orders Business of Supply 38 statements
  16. Government Orders Business of Supply 28 statements
  17. Government Orders Main Estimates, 2026-27 106 statements
  18. Government Orders Supplementary Estimates (A), 2026‑27 7 statements
  19. Government Orders Government Orders 5 statements
  20. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  21. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements