Justice

Question period focused on bail and sentencing after a violent home invasion in Toronto that left a family shot and injured. Conservatives cited rising home invasion numbers in Toronto and pressed the government to say whether it would support their two bills, one creating a stand-alone home invasion offence with a mandatory minimum sentence and another on defending oneself at home. Government ministers said they had brought in their own comprehensive legislation—the Bail and Sentencing Reform Act, along with a victims’ rights bill—that tightens bail, toughens sentences for violent offences including home invasions tied to organized crime, and protects victims; they said the law already guarantees the right of self-defence in the home, that provinces now need to enforce the measures, and that they want opposition collaboration rather than what they called piecemeal bills. They also sent condolences to the affected family.Written by AI from the debate. Updated .

Official text (opens in a new tab)

10 statements

Roman Baber, North York

Conservative
“Home invasions in Toronto are up 32 percent this year, and a recent one left three people shot. The government's bail and sentencing bill fails to fix this because it still lets accused criminals out too easily and cuts mandatory minimum sentences. I want the Attorney General to admit this failure and work with Conservatives on real bail and sentencing reform.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, Toronto was horrified by the Bridle Path home invasion in which a father and two daughters were shot and a mother injured. This was the 119th invasion in Toronto this year. That is a 32% increase from the same period in 2025. It is clear that the Liberal government’s bail and sentencing reform is a failure. The bail principle of restraint, to let an accused out at the earliest opportunity, remains. Conservatives wanted mandatory minimum sentences for armed home invasions. Instead the Liberals gutted all mandatory minimum sentences. Will the Attorney General own his failure and work with Conservatives to pass real bail and sentencing reform?

Sean Fraser, Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada and Minister responsible for the Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency

Liberal
“We wrote these public safety laws by listening to police, provincial governments, and victims' groups, instead of listening to Conservatives shouting in the House. I believe we made the right choice.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, we had a choice of who to listen to when it came to actually developing measures that were going to promote public safety in this country: Conservative members, who would simply yell and make noise on the floor of the House of Commons, or those who have dedicated their lives and careers to demand better public safety outcomes for Canadians. We chose to work with police who work on the ground to improve public safety. We chose to work with provincial governments that have the responsibility to administer the justice system of their province, and we worked with advocacy organizations that defended the interests of victims. I think we made the right choice.

Michael Guglielmin, Vaughan—Woodbridge

Conservative
“Home invasions are up 50% in Toronto. We have two bills to punish home invaders more harshly and to let Canadians better defend themselves in their homes. Will the Liberals support these bills, yes or no?”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, according to the Toronto Star, home invasions are up 50% in Toronto. Canadians want action. That is why we have two bills before the House. We have the proposed safe at home act, which would create a stand-alone offence for home invasions and carry with it a mandatory minimum of five years and a maximum of life imprisonment. We also have the proposed stand on guard law, which would strengthen provisions for self-defence so Canadians can defend themselves in their own home. I have a very simple question for the minister. On these two bills, will the Liberals stand with us and support them so that we can protect Canadians in their own home, yes or no?

Sean Fraser, Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada and Minister responsible for the Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency

Liberal
“Canadians already have the right to defend themselves in their homes. We also changed the law to make bail harder to get and sentences tougher for violent home invasions, especially those tied to organized crime. These changes are working, but we still have more to do.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, protecting the ability of Canadians to defend themselves in their own home is absolutely a priority that we share. Thankfully, that is what the law provides for today, but we took it a step further by implementing changes to the Criminal Code, which are now the law of Canada, that ensure there is a reverse onus when we have violent home invasions for someone seeking to have bail. It ensures that there is potential for tougher sentences when there are violent home invasions, particularly when they are tied to organized crime. We are seized with the issue. We are working, and as a result of the measures we put in place, we are seeing progress across the country. The job is not done, but we are trending in the right direction.

Michael Guglielmin, Vaughan—Woodbridge

Conservative
“I want the minister to give a yes-or-no answer. Will the Liberals support our two crime bills to protect Canadians from violent crimes like home invasions?”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I cannot understand for the life of me why the minister cannot answer the very simple question. The father of the family who just suffered the violent home invasion in Toronto said the following: “It is difficult to put into words the trauma of experiencing something so horrific in the one place where everyone should feel safest: their own home.” That is why we put these two bills before the House. This is a very simple question. Canadians deserve a very clear answer. Will the Liberals support these two pieces of legislation that we have before the House so we can protect Canadians, yes or no?

Gary Anandasangaree, Minister of Public Safety

Liberal
“I send my condolences to the family hurt by this crime. Everyone deserves to be safe at home. Our government has already introduced strong laws to fix bail, toughen sentences, and protect victims. These laws will keep Canadians safe.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, first of all, we send our deepest condolences to the family impacted by this horrific incident. All of us in this House share the need for safety and security in someone’s home. However, I will be very clear: We brought forward significant legislation, the most comprehensive criminal justice legislation in a generation, including stronger sentencing as well as bail reform and including protection of victims’ rights. These are critical pieces of legislation that will ensure the safety and security of Canadians over the long term.

Frank Caputo, Kamloops—Thompson—Nicola

Conservative

Linked statement

“People should feel safe in their homes. Armed men recently broke into a Toronto home and hurt a family. Will the Prime Minister support our bill to give harsher punishments to home invaders?”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, recently a Toronto family of four was terrorized by three masked men who entered their home with hammers and guns. Three people were shot and two people were hit with hammers. The family will never be the same. People should feel that they are safest when they are in their homes. Therefore, will the Prime Minister support our legislation to get tough on home invaders so people can feel safest in their homes?

Gary Anandasangaree, Minister of Public Safety

Liberal
“We already passed big laws to make bail and sentencing tougher and to protect victims' rights. The Conservatives did not support those laws. Now the provinces need to enforce them.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, we have brought forward transformational legislation to protect those who are suffering from the scourge of issues such as home invasion. We have in place Bill C-14, which strengthens bail as well as sentencing. We have Bill C-16, which ensures victims’ rights are protected. These are transformational pieces of legislation. Unfortunately, the party opposite did not give us its support. It is important that these pieces of legislation are implemented and that is what we look to the provinces to do.

Frank Caputo, Kamloops—Thompson—Nicola

Conservative
“The government's justice laws are not working, and violent crimes in homes are still putting people in the hospital. We must pass our Conservative bill to protect people in their homes. When will the Liberals act?”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, the minister speaks about transformational legislation. The Liberals can tell that to the family of four who are now in the hospital. We have to ensure that people are safest when the are in their own homes. Reforms are absolutely needed. One of the answers is our safe at home act that was put forward by the member for Vaughan—Woodbridge. How many more families need to suffer in their own homes before the Liberals take the time to act?

Gary Anandasangaree, Minister of Public Safety

Liberal
“Our bill protects Canadians and victims of crime. We need the opposition to work with us on it. We do not need small, piecemeal bills that miss the bigger picture.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I repeat: We have brought forward significant legislation that will protect Canadians in their homes and on the streets, as well as those victims who have been impacted by the criminal justice system. What we need right now is collaboration from the opposition. We do not need piecemeal pieces of a private member’s bill that does not look at the bigger picture. That is why we have brought forward the most comprehensive criminal justice legislation in a generation.

Discussion

No comments yet

See the full discussion

Comment rules

More from sitting 160

  1. Private Members' Business Income Tax Act 7 statements
  2. Government Orders Business of Supply 51 statements
  3. Oral Questions Taxation 12 statements
  4. Oral Questions Intergovernmental Relations 6 statements
  5. Oral Questions Taxation 12 statements
  6. Oral Questions The Economy 2 statements
  7. Oral Questions Justice 10 statements
  8. Oral Questions Employment Insurance 2 statements
  9. Oral Questions Health 4 statements
  10. Oral Questions International Trade 14 statements
  11. Oral Questions Health 2 statements
  12. Oral Questions Public Services and Procurement 7 statements
  13. Oral Questions Health 2 statements
  14. Oral Questions Labour 2 statements
  15. Oral Questions Veterans Affairs 2 statements
  16. Government Orders Business of Supply 93 statements
  17. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  18. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  19. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  20. Oral Questions The Environment 4 statements