Adjournment Proceedings

The debate centered on the PrescribeIT digital prescription program and the government’s response to allegations of missing funds and executive payouts. A Conservative member stated that $200 million is missing from the $300 million digital program and argued that the government’s explanations regarding oversight and executive bonuses were inadequate. In response, a Liberal MP asserted that an independent review and external audit are underway to demonstrate that taxpayer money is being used properly.Written by AI from the debate. Updated .

Official text (opens in a new tab)

4 statements

Michael Cooper, St. Albert—Sturgeon River

Conservative
“The government spent $300 million on a digital prescription program that failed, and $200 million of that money is missing. Meanwhile, executives got huge bonuses and payouts while the health minister asked no questions. I want the government to explain why there was no oversight.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I rise to follow up on a question I posed to the Minister of Health regarding the PrescribeIT scandal. I have to say that a week and a half ago when I participated in an adjournment debate on this scandal, I was astounded that the parliamentary secretary to the Minister of Natural Resources had the audacity to say that the way the Liberals have handled PrescribeIT is what good governance looks like. Is it really? We are talking about a failed IT solution to digitize prescription services that cost taxpayers $300 million for a service that almost no one used. Even more concerning is the fact that of that $300 million, 200 million tax dollars are missing and unaccounted for. There are also the Liberal insider executives who got rich padding their pockets with exorbitant bonuses. Let us take the CEO, Michael Green, for example. He padded his pocket with in excess of $600,000 in bonuses in just three years, between 2023 and 2026. Then he was awarded $1 million on his way out the door after the Minister of Health claimed she had fired him. I can only say that most Canadians would love to have $1 million in compensation upon being fired. There are at least five other executives who received between $70,000 and $90,000 in bonuses in the same three-year period. We are talking about millions of tax dollars that went out the door by way of bonuses to reward Liberal insider executives who presided over what was a complete and total debacle, if not something much worse. Then, there is the Minister of Health. Where was the Minister of Health through it all? The minister had completely turned a blind eye. She turned a blind eye as millions of dollars continued to flow to PrescribeIT. Officials testified at the health committee that the minister asked no questions about PrescribeIT. She had no questions about where 300 million taxpayer dollars had gone. The parliamentary secretary says that is what good governance looks like. If that is what good governance looks like, I would hate to see what bad governance looks like. It is time for the Liberals to stop gaslighting and begin to answer some basic questions such as where the oversight was as 300 million tax dollars went up in smoke as the health minister was asleep at the switch.

Maggie Chi, Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Health

Liberal
“We are making sure taxpayers get good value for their money. We started an independent review and an outside audit of Infoway, and both are happening now. The Auditor General called this a strong response and said her office does not need to do more work on it. The member opposite should accept that.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, first, I appreciate a lot of the late show speeches. Monday is a good start to the week. As we go through the session, we have a lot of great legislation going on in the House, including Bill C-39 and a lot of the safe social media bills we are trying to advance also. As the minister announced in June, our government wants to be sure we are getting accountability and value for money for taxpayers. This why she launched the independent review of Infoway’s governance and structure, and a third party audit of the organization’s findings. I want to make sure my colleague is aware that the review and the audits are both under way, and we are looking forward to seeing and sharing the results once they are available. The Auditor General herself felt this was a very strong response, and the last time I checked, my Conservative colleague still respects the work of the Auditor General. She said that any additional work on the file by her would be “duplicative and therefore of limited added value for Parliamentarians and Canadians.” Especially seeing that the member opposite’s Conservative colleagues on the health committee were some of the people who asked for the Auditor General’s thoughts on the matter, I hope it is a good enough response for my colleague across the way as well.

Michael Cooper, St. Albert—Sturgeon River

Conservative

Linked statement

“The parliamentary secretary did not answer my questions about oversight. I want her to answer why Mr. Green was given a $1-million payout when he left, and why the minister did not disclose it.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, it is a totally inadequate response. What we just heard from the parliamentary secretary was more gaslighting. Her answer was very much in line with the ridiculous answer provided by the parliamentary secretary to the Minister of Natural Resources. Since she will not answer basic questions, such as where the oversight was, perhaps she will answer a very specific question: Why did Mr. Green receive a $1-million golden parachute on his way out the door, and why did the minister fail to disclose this?

Maggie Chi, Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Health

Liberal
“We need to let the independent audit and review finish. That work will show Canadians that their money is being spent properly.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I want to emphasize that there is work under way, and we need to allow the independent auditors to do their work, work that I hope the member will also allow. There is work under way, an internal review of the governance and structure of Infoway. Maybe my colleague did not get the updated QP card from his leader. Canadians deserve a modernized health care system, and we will always make sure that that is built on the best possible information. Allowing for that third-party review and audit to be completed will do that work, and it will give Canadians the confidence that our money is being spent appropriately.

Discussion

No comments yet

See the full discussion

Comment rules

More from sitting 160

  1. Private Members' Business Income Tax Act 7 statements
  2. Government Orders Business of Supply 51 statements
  3. Oral Questions Taxation 12 statements
  4. Oral Questions Intergovernmental Relations 6 statements
  5. Oral Questions Taxation 12 statements
  6. Oral Questions The Economy 2 statements
  7. Oral Questions Justice 10 statements
  8. Oral Questions Employment Insurance 2 statements
  9. Oral Questions Health 4 statements
  10. Oral Questions International Trade 14 statements
  11. Oral Questions Health 2 statements
  12. Oral Questions Public Services and Procurement 7 statements
  13. Oral Questions Health 2 statements
  14. Oral Questions Labour 2 statements
  15. Oral Questions Veterans Affairs 2 statements
  16. Government Orders Business of Supply 93 statements
  17. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  18. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  19. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  20. Oral Questions The Environment 4 statements