Natural Resources

During question period on natural resources, the Bloc Québécois asked about public money for a proposed western oil pipeline, including reported spending to seek Indigenous community support, and asked that Quebec taxpayers’ money not go toward it, citing past spending on Trans Mountain and oil subsidies. It also criticized the government’s approval of a new gas pipeline expansion in western Canada and questioned its commitment to climate action. Liberal ministers responded by pointing to projects in Quebec, including a graphite mine, the Contrecoeur shipyard, mining and battery-sector investments, and the designation of the Port of Quebec as a first port of arrival, and said Canada would remain a leader in both conventional and renewable energy.Written by AI from the debate. Updated .

Official text (opens in a new tab)

3 statements

Yves Perron, Berthier—Maskinongé

Bloc Québécois
“The government wants to spend $10 billion of public money to convince Indigenous communities to support a new oil pipeline. I want the government to promise not to spend Quebeckers' money on this project.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, the Liberals are busy launching their new dirty oil pipeline project out west. Things may be buzzing in Ottawa, but it is crickets from developers. Nobody is interested. Who is going to pay, then? The answer is the Minister of Energy and Natural Resources. Yesterday, he confirmed in committee that he wants to give $10 billion of taxpayer money to indigenous communities so that they will agree to participate in the project. The Liberals are trying to buy social licence with $10 billion in cheques. Will the Liberals back down and promise not to put Quebeckers’ money into their pipeline?

Yves Perron, Berthier—Maskinongé

Bloc Québécois
“Quebec taxpayers have already spent billions on oil companies and the Trans Mountain pipeline. We will not pay for another oil pipeline. The government should spend our tax money on health care, fighting climate change, and dealing with American tariffs instead.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, when a member responds by talking about something else, it means he is bothered by the question. Quebeckers have already paid $34 billion for the Trans Mountain pipeline. We are already paying billions of dollars in subsidies to oil companies, even though those companies are making exorbitant profits because of the war in Iran. There is no way that we are going to pay for another dirty oil pipeline. Quebeckers want their money to be used to fight climate change, to counter Donald Trump’s tariffs and to fund health care. Basically, they want it to be used for anything other than saving oil companies money. When will the Liberals finally get the message?

Patrick Bonin, Repentigny

Bloc Québécois
“The government just approved a new gas pipeline project in western Canada. Instead of building clean energy, they are increasing our use of fossil fuels. I want to know why Liberal members let the Prime Minister back away from climate action.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, the Liberals’ descent into an ecological abyss continues. This morning, they approved the expansion of yet another gas project in western Canada. They announced Sunrise, an Enbridge pipeline designed to export shale gas produced through hydraulic fracturing. Instead of developing clean energy and reducing dependence on dirty energy, like other countries are doing, Canada is using the war in Iran as an excuse to increase its reliance on gas. It is another giant step backward. Is there a limit to how much packpedalling on climate action the Liberals will tolerate from their Prime Minister?

Discussion

No comments yet

See the full discussion

Comment rules

More from sitting 110

  1. Government Orders Strong and Free Elections Act 24 statements
  2. Oral Questions Finance 12 statements
  3. Oral Questions Natural Resources 6 statements
  4. Oral Questions Finance 6 statements
  5. Oral Questions Ethics 2 statements
  6. Oral Questions Public Services and Procurement 4 statements
  7. Oral Questions Labour 4 statements
  8. Oral Questions Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship 4 statements
  9. Oral Questions Health 4 statements
  10. Oral Questions International Trade 2 statements
  11. Oral Questions Taxation 2 statements
  12. Oral Questions International Trade 18 statements
  13. Oral Questions Foreign Affairs 2 statements
  14. Oral Questions Indigenous Affairs 2 statements
  15. Oral Questions Public Safety 2 statements
  16. Oral Questions The Environment 2 statements
  17. Oral Questions Steel and Aluminum Industry 5 statements
  18. Government Orders Strong and Free Elections Act 41 statements
  19. Oral Questions The Economy 2 statements
  20. Private Members' Business Jury Duty Appreciation Week Act 13 statements
  21. Oral Questions International Trade 4 statements