Natural Resources

During question period on natural resources, the Conservatives said the government’s policies and the carbon tax are making Canadian energy uncompetitive and driving investment away, citing the Cenovus CEO’s comments, and asked when the government will approve the next pipeline, noting a previous promise to speed up project approvals. The Liberal minister replied that major companies are investing in Canada, pointing to the Shell and Enbridge CEOs’ statements and billions in investment, and listed projects underway including the Taylor to Gordondale pipeline, an expansion of a major B.C. pipeline system, an $8 billion investment in Goose Bay, a wind farm, and power lines.Written by AI from the debate. Updated .

Official text (opens in a new tab)

2 statements

Jacob Mantle, York—Durham

Conservative
“Liberal policies and the carbon tax make Canadian energy uncompetitive and drive investment away. Will the minister cut all gas taxes for a year to help Canadians?”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, for weeks now the Liberals have blamed external events for homegrown problems. For higher gasoline, they blame Iran. For higher diesel, they blame Iran. However, yesterday the CEO of Cenovus said it was not external events but Liberal policies that were making resource development and investment in Canada uncompetitive. He said the industrial carbon tax incents industry to invest outside Canada, so Liberal policies equal higher costs, more debt for Canadians and fleeing investors. Will the Minister of Energy instead give Canadians a break and cut all the gas taxes for the entire year?

Jacob Mantle, York—Durham

Conservative
“The government promised to speed up pipeline and resource project approvals, but it has not approved any. When will the minister approve the next pipeline?”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, CBC is reporting that the Liberals will change the rules for resource development and pipeline approvals to allegedly try to speed them up, but we have been here before. Last year they promised big projects at speeds never seen before. If the minister were right, we would have projects coming out of everywhere, but in that year, no project has been approved in the national interest and nothing has been fast-tracked. Not one anti-resource development law or tax has been removed. It is beginning to feel a little like Alice in Wonderland, in which the rule is, “pipeline tomorrow, pipeline yesterday, but never a pipeline today.” If that is not the case, will the minister tell us when the next pipeline will be approved?

Discussion

No comments yet

See the full discussion

Comment rules

More from sitting 119

  1. Government Orders Business of Supply 116 statements
  2. Oral Questions The Economy 4 statements
  3. Oral Questions Natural Resources 4 statements
  4. Oral Questions Climate Change 6 statements
  5. Oral Questions Youth 14 statements
  6. Oral Questions The Economy 4 statements
  7. Oral Questions Youth 4 statements
  8. Oral Questions Veterans Affairs 2 statements
  9. Oral Questions International Trade 2 statements
  10. Oral Questions Health 4 statements
  11. Oral Questions Climate Change 4 statements
  12. Oral Questions International Trade 2 statements
  13. Oral Questions Indigenous Affairs 6 statements
  14. Oral Questions Youth 2 statements
  15. Oral Questions Foreign Affairs 2 statements
  16. Oral Questions Air Transportation 2 statements
  17. Oral Questions Climate Change 2 statements
  18. Oral Questions Aerospace Industry 4 statements
  19. Oral Questions Business of the House 2 statements
  20. Government Orders Business of Supply 69 statements
  21. Private Members' Business Financial Administration Act 11 statements
  22. Oral Questions Finance 4 statements
  23. Oral Questions National Defence 11 statements
  24. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  25. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  26. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements