Justice

During Question Period on justice matters, the Bloc Québécois pressed the government on how any future Quebec referendum would be judged, arguing that a democratic majority is 50% of votes plus one and asking the government to respect such a result. The Liberal replies pointed to the Clarity Act’s requirement of a clear majority, said the party will follow that law, and said they would wait to see the results of what happens in Alberta before commenting further. The exchange stayed on the referendum threshold and the clarification rules.Written by AI from the debate. Updated .

Official text (opens in a new tab)

2 statements

Mario Simard, Jonquière

Bloc Québécois
“The government says it will use federal rules to judge any future referendum in Quebec. A real democracy lets the people decide by a simple majority of 50 percent plus one. Will the government respect our democratic choice?”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, yesterday, the Prime Minister and his Minister of Justice confirmed that any future referendum will be subject to the undemocratic Clarity Act. They want to pick the question and decide what constitutes a majority. We would remind them that a democratic majority is 50% of the votes plus one. That is the rule wherever democracy exists. We would also remind them that the difference between a democracy and a banana republic is that in a banana republic, the government interferes with its citizens’ democratic choice. Is the government going to respect democracy?

Mario Simard, Jonquière

Bloc Québécois
“In a democracy, winning means getting 50 percent of the vote plus one. That is the rule for our elections, and it is Quebec's law for a referendum. I want the Liberals to respect that rule.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, they were not that clear yesterday. We will say it again: Democracy means 50% of the votes plus one. That is the threshold everywhere, for the laws passed here, for elections, for the people who are here. It is the same for everyone. An attack on that is an attack, in Quebec’s case, on a people’s right to self-determination. It is an attack on Quebec’s Bill 99, which establishes the rule of 50% plus one for any referendum and which has stood up in court. It is an attack on the principle of free elections. Will the Liberals stop sliding toward authoritarianism and respect democracy?

Discussion

No comments yet

See the full discussion

Comment rules

More from sitting 120

  1. Government Orders Military Justice System Modernization Act 22 statements
  2. Oral Questions Employment 12 statements
  3. Oral Questions Oil and Gas Industry 6 statements
  4. Oral Questions Youth 4 statements
  5. Oral Questions Finance 2 statements
  6. Oral Questions Justice 4 statements
  7. Oral Questions National Defence 6 statements
  8. Oral Questions Justice 2 statements
  9. Oral Questions Indigenous Affairs 10 statements
  10. Oral Questions Foreign Affairs 2 statements
  11. Oral Questions Health 6 statements
  12. Oral Questions Public Safety 2 statements
  13. Oral Questions Finance 2 statements
  14. Oral Questions Climate Change 2 statements
  15. Government Orders Military Justice System Modernization Act 28 statements
  16. Oral Questions International Trade 4 statements
  17. Oral Questions Finance 8 statements
  18. Oral Questions Canadian Identity and Culture 2 statements
  19. Private Members' Business Food and Drugs Act 14 statements
  20. Oral Questions Youth 4 statements
  21. Oral Questions Finance 2 statements
  22. Oral Questions Youth 2 statements