Health

Question period touched on two health topics. The NDP asked why flavoured vaping products have not been banned, saying the Liberals promised a ban five years ago, the regulations are drafted, and evidence shows flavour bans reduce youth vaping; a Liberal member said youth vaping is a serious issue and pointed to public education and enforcement against companies exploiting loopholes. The NDP also raised a constituent with a vaccine injury who was approved for $26,000 in medical and home support costs but has not been reimbursed and is being evicted, asking for a way to handle urgent cases; a Liberal member said the vaccine injury support program is meant to help Canadians and that the Public Health Agency of Canada took over administering it in April to deliver support while spending public money responsibly.Written by AI from the debate. Updated .

Official text (opens in a new tab)

2 statements

Gord Johns, Courtenay—Alberni

NDP
“The Liberals promised five years ago to ban flavoured vapes that attract kids. The rules are written, and evidence shows these bans work. I want to know who is stopping the rules and when the government will finally ban these flavours.”
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, five years ago, the Liberals promised to ban flavoured vaping products that appeal to youth. Health Canada drafted the regulations years ago, and evidence from Canada, Quebec and the Netherlands shows that flavour bans can reduce youth vaping without increasing smoking rates, yet shelves remain stocked with bubble gum-flavoured, cotton candy-flavoured, berry-flavoured, mango-flavoured and watermelon-flavoured products designed to attract young people and increase the risk of nicotine addiction. The evidence is clear and the regulations are ready. Who is blocking these regulations, and when will the Liberal government finally ban these youth-targeted flavoured vaping products?

Jenny Kwan, Vancouver East

NDP
“A disabled man in my riding was promised $26,000 for medical costs, but the government has not paid him. He is broke and losing his home. I want the minister to create a way to help urgent cases like this right now.”
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, my constituent suffered a debilitating vaccine injury. He is in constant pain and permanently disabled. Oxaro approved his $26,000 medical and home support costs back in February. He has yet to be reimbursed. He is now broke and being evicted. The health minister says to contact the Public Health Agency of Canada. PHAC says it is in transition and will not even look at the file until July. This is unacceptable. My constituent will be homeless and may not survive if he does not get help now. Will the minister immediately put in place a system to address urgent cases?

Discussion

No comments yet

See the full discussion

Comment rules

More from sitting 130

  1. Government Orders Build Canada Homes Act 34 statements
  2. Oral Questions The Economy 12 statements
  3. Oral Questions Canadian Identity and Culture 6 statements
  4. Oral Questions The Economy 14 statements
  5. Oral Questions The Economy 30 statements
  6. Oral Questions Artificial Intelligence 2 statements
  7. Oral Questions The Economy 4 statements
  8. Oral Questions Transportation 2 statements
  9. Oral Questions The Economy 2 statements
  10. Oral Questions Agriculture and Agri-Food 2 statements
  11. Oral Questions Health 4 statements
  12. Oral Questions Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship 4 statements
  13. Government Orders Build Canada Homes Act 28 statements
  14. Private Members' Business Silver Alert National Framework Act 4 statements