Oil and Gas Industry

During question period, the Bloc Québécois pressed the government on its support for oil and gas, citing a letter signed by 122 environmental groups calling for no new pipelines, and pointing to the roughly $40 billion taxpayers spent on the Trans Mountain pipeline as a failed approach. Liberal members replied that Canada can fight climate change while remaining an economically autonomous country, citing plans to cut pollution, expand clean electricity, and develop natural resources responsibly toward the 2050 climate goals. One Liberal response argued that the Bloc only says no to development.Written by AI from the debate. Updated .

Official text (opens in a new tab)

2 statements

Patrick Bonin, Repentigny

Bloc Québécois
“Over a hundred environmental groups signed a letter saying no to new pipelines. Pipelines harm the climate, wildlife, and Indigenous relations. Will the Prime Minister stop supporting oil and gas?”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, one week after 300 mayors, civil society is now speaking out against the Liberals’ pro-oil stance. One hundred and twenty-two environmental groups, including 49 from Quebec, signed a letter today. They are here with a clear message: no new pipelines. They are saying no to any project that threatens the climate, endangered species, indigenous relations or the sovereignty of governments. It would be a betrayal of all Canadians who still believe in the fight against climate change. Will the Prime Minister end his pro-oil and gas stance?

Patrick Bonin, Repentigny

Bloc Québécois
“Taxpayers spent nearly $40 billion on the Trans Mountain pipeline, and oil emissions only went up. Quebeckers paid for that. I want the Prime Minister to admit this failed and promise not to make another pipeline deal.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, regarding the agreement with Alberta for a new pipeline, environmental groups are pointing out that we have seen this movie before. It is called “Trans Mountain”. Taxpayers paid nearly $40 billion for a new pipeline to transport dirty oil. In return, the oil sector made absolutely zero effort to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions. They actually rose sharply. Canada basically became an oil developer at Quebeckers’ expense. The film was a flop. Will the Prime Minister finally acknowledge that we do not want to see that movie ever again?

Discussion

No comments yet

See the full discussion

Comment rules

More from sitting 132

  1. Government Orders Build Canada Homes Act 34 statements
  2. Government Orders Government Orders 39 statements
  3. Oral Questions Rail Transportation 4 statements
  4. Oral Questions The Economy 7 statements
  5. Oral Questions Canadian Identity and Culture 6 statements
  6. Oral Questions The Economy 15 statements
  7. Oral Questions Oil and Gas Industry 4 statements
  8. Oral Questions The Economy 4 statements
  9. Oral Questions Steel and Aluminum Industry 4 statements
  10. Oral Questions International Trade 2 statements
  11. Oral Questions The Economy 10 statements
  12. Oral Questions Diversity and Inclusion 2 statements
  13. Oral Questions Public Safety 9 statements
  14. Oral Questions The Economy 2 statements
  15. Oral Questions Agriculture and Agri-Food 2 statements
  16. Oral Questions International Trade 2 statements
  17. Oral Questions Health 2 statements
  18. Oral Questions Employment 8 statements
  19. Government Orders Build Canada Homes Act 45 statements
  20. Private Members' Business Corrections and Conditional Release Act 7 statements
  21. Government Orders Build Canada Homes Act 59 statements
  22. Government Orders Protecting Victims Act 106 statements
  23. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements