“You won't listen to farmers about this train! Lots of people came to complain. They don't want their land split in two. The Prime Minister should stop this train project. It's bad!”
What they said. What they meant.
Plain-language translations from the House of Commons.
Recent debates
8 latest topics
Spring Economic Update 2026 Implementation Act
57 statements
Spring Economic Update 2026 Implementation Act
19 statements
Arab Heritage Month Act
5 statements
The Economy
15 statements
Government Priorities
2 statements
Government Priorities
2 statements
Housing
12 statements
The Environment
2 statements
Oral Questions
Rail Transportation
A debate on a proposed high-speed rail project that would involve significant government spending and potential expropriation of farmland. The Bloc Quebecois listed several conditions they wanted met before supporting it. The Liberals insisted they respect farmers but want to press ahead with the costly rail line, arguing it will boost trade and help the economy. Conservatives questioned the financial sense of the project given its huge price tag amid an affordability crisis for many Canadians. The Liberals responded that recent federal benefit payments show they are aware of Canadians' struggles but still think this $100+ billion rail project is worthwhile.
“Why don't you go talk to the farmers yourself? Experts say your train project is irresponsible. It will need lots of subsidies. Liberals want a train that doesn't make sense. That money should be spent on other infrastructure to help farmers. When will you spend money on useful things?”
“The government wants to spend over $100 billion on a train. Canadians are struggling to afford food. That's unreasonable.”
“I don't think you heard me. Canadians are struggling. They can't afford food. And you want to throw money at a fancy train? Come on. You're out of touch.”