Rail Transportation

During question period, members raised the Alto high-speed rail project planned for Quebec and Ontario after farmers from the Mirabel area protested on Parliament Hill against the loss of their land. The Bloc Québécois said the government has not met conditions including consultation, respect for landowners facing expropriation, and an independent financial review, and asked the minister to meet with the farmers. Conservatives said the project threatens farming communities, questioned spending over $100 billion on it when many Canadians face food insecurity and financial strain, and asked the government to stop it. Liberal ministers said they respect farmers and will seek a middle ground, and argued the project would create jobs, connect major cities, boost trade between Quebec and Ontario, and reduce pollution.Written by AI from the debate. Updated .

Official text (opens in a new tab)

4 statements

Jacques Gourde, Lévis—Lotbinière

Conservative
“Farmers do not want the high-speed train cutting across their land. I want the Prime Minister to listen to them and stop this project.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, hundreds of people gathered on Parliament Hill today to make their voices heard about the Alto train, which is threatening the survival of our communities. These people included many farmers facing the prospect of not being able to cross their land because of the Liberal government’s threat to split it in two. I have not met a single farmer who wants a high‑speed train cutting across their land. Will the Prime Minister listen to the farmers and stop work on this project, which is totally off track?

Jacques Gourde, Lévis—Lotbinière

Conservative
“The minister should meet with farmers to explain why the government is taking their land for this rail project. Experts say the project is a waste of money and will not make a profit. We should spend this money on useful infrastructure instead.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, if the minister believes that this project is sound, he should go and meet with farmers himself to explain the expropriations. Experts are unanimous: This ideologically motivated project is completely irresponsible when it comes to our public finances. There is no evidence that it will be cost-effective. The Liberals want to leave us with a white elephant that runs purely on subsidies. With $90 million, we could refurbish nearly all of our infrastructure in Canada and become a global agricultural powerhouse. When are the Liberals going to invest in projects that will actually create wealth in Canada?

Pierre Paul-Hus, Charlesbourg—Haute-Saint-Charles

Conservative
“Canadians are struggling to buy food and pay their bills. Why is the government spending more than $100 billion on a high-speed train?”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, a United Way report released today reveals that Canadians are increasingly concerned about their financial situations. According to the report, 60% of Canadians are anxious about their finances, and 38% of Canadians are experiencing food insecurity. While families are struggling to build a future for themselves, the government wants them to foot the bill for a high-speed rail project that could cost more than $100 billion. Just this morning, the Liberals admitted that they have no idea how much it is going to cost. If Canadians can no longer afford to put food on the table, why do the Liberals think they can afford to spend over $100 billion on a train?

Pierre Paul-Hus, Charlesbourg—Haute-Saint-Charles

Conservative
“Many Canadians cannot afford food right now. The government should not spend over $100 billion on a fast train that people cannot afford to ride. I want an answer.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I think the Secretary of State for Nature did not understand what I said in my first question. Sixty per cent of Canadians are feeling anxious, and 38% of Canadians are experiencing food insecurity. The government wants to embark on a high-speed rail project costing over $100 billion while people are going hungry. How can anyone think that these people can afford a ticket to ride the high-speed train when they cannot even afford groceries? Can she answer that?

Discussion

No comments yet

See the full discussion

Comment rules

More from sitting 133

  1. Oral Questions Member for Côte-du-Sud—Rivière-du-Loup—Kataskomiq—Témiscouata 2 statements
  2. Oral Questions International Trade 4 statements
  3. Oral Questions Canadian Identity and Culture 2 statements
  4. Oral Questions The Economy 14 statements
  5. Oral Questions Taxation 2 statements
  6. Oral Questions Rail Transportation 12 statements
  7. Oral Questions The Economy 2 statements
  8. Oral Questions Indigenous Affairs 2 statements
  9. Oral Questions Natural Resources 2 statements
  10. Oral Questions Housing 2 statements
  11. Oral Questions National Defence 6 statements
  12. Oral Questions Canadian Identity and Culture 2 statements
  13. Oral Questions The Economy 2 statements
  14. Oral Questions Air Transportation 3 statements
  15. Oral Questions The Economy 8 statements
  16. Oral Questions The Economy 19 statements
  17. Government Orders Bail and Sentencing Reform Act 11 statements
  18. Private Members' Business Food and Drugs Act 9 statements
  19. Government Orders Government Orders 24 statements
  20. Government Orders Government Orders 16 statements
  21. Government Orders Government Orders 25 statements
  22. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements