Labour

Question period dealt with federal labour policy and the government’s new labour legislation. NDP members said the Bank of Canada broke the law twice by using replacement workers during a strike and argued that the government’s new bill weakens workers’ right to strike, asking who the bill was meant to serve. Liberal ministers replied that the government always protects workers’ constitutional right to strike, that stepping into labour disputes should happen only in exceptional circumstances, and that the bill adds rules to help parties reach agreements at the bargaining table, which the minister said labour groups had asked for. The remaining items in the period were unrelated procedural matters, including a request for unanimous consent to table a constituent’s letter and a complaint about noise during members’ statements.Written by AI from the debate. Updated .

Official text (opens in a new tab)

2 statements

Heather McPherson, Edmonton Strathcona

NDP
“The Bank of Canada broke the law twice this summer by using replacement workers during a strike, and the government did nothing. Now the government is trying to weaken the right to strike. When will the government stand up for workers instead of employers?”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, twice this summer the Canada Industrial Relations Board found that the Bank of Canada broke the law by using scabs against striking security officers represented by PSAC. Twice. The Liberal government has done absolutely nothing to fix this, which is hardly surprising coming from a government that introduced legislation yesterday to undermine workers’ right to strike. When will the government stop siding with employers and start standing up for workers, or does the government believe that labour law is something that only workers have to obey?

Gord Johns, Courtenay—Alberni

NDP
“The government's new bill takes away the right to strike. Striking is how workers fight for fair pay to feed their families. I want the government to explain who asked for this bill, and how hurting workers' bargaining power helps families.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, who is the government listening to? Canada’s biggest corporations are making record profits, yet yesterday the Liberals introduced legislation trying to take away workers’ right to strike. Withholding labour is the workers’ bargaining power. It is how families fight back against corporate greed so people can feed their kids. We are asking, precisely who asked the Liberal government for these changes, and can the Liberals explain how they think weakening bargaining power helps Canadian families?

Discussion

No comments yet

See the full discussion

Comment rules

More from sitting 141

  1. Government Orders Canadian Fuel Affordability Act 92 statements
  2. Oral Questions The Economy 12 statements
  3. Government Orders Canadian Fuel Affordability Act 10 statements
  4. Oral Questions Government Priorities 6 statements
  5. Oral Questions The Economy 4 statements
  6. Oral Questions Forestry Industry 4 statements
  7. Oral Questions Housing 4 statements
  8. Oral Questions The Economy 2 statements
  9. Oral Questions Canadian Identity and Culture 4 statements
  10. Oral Questions Housing 4 statements
  11. Oral Questions The Economy 8 statements
  12. Oral Questions Public Safety 4 statements
  13. Oral Questions Justice 4 statements
  14. Oral Questions The Economy 8 statements
  15. Oral Questions The Economy 2 statements
  16. Oral Questions Justice 4 statements
  17. Oral Questions Taxation 2 statements
  18. Oral Questions The Economy 2 statements
  19. Oral Questions Labour 6 statements
  20. Oral Questions Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship 2 statements
  21. Government Orders Canadian Fuel Affordability Act 65 statements
  22. Oral Questions Justice 2 statements
  23. Private Members' Business Jury Duty Appreciation Week Act 6 statements
  24. Government Orders Canadian Fuel Affordability Act 182 statements
  25. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  26. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements