Business of Supply

A supply-day debate on a Conservative motion for what members called an emergency diesel relief plan: cutting taxes on diesel and making it easier to build energy projects, including more Canadian refining capacity, with the aim of lowering costs for farmers, truckers and families. Conservatives said federal taxes and policy are driving up gas and grocery prices, and noted they have proposed fuel-tax relief several times before. Liberals pointed to the government’s existing fuel tax break and other affordability measures, saying Canada cannot control global prices, that relief should be immediate rather than long-term, and that energy development and clean alternatives can go ahead together. The Bloc Québécois proposed refunding the diesel excise tax to businesses when prices spike, paid for by ending oil and gas subsidies, and questioned subsidies to that sector; the NDP called for taxing record oil and gas company profits. Some members also traded remarks about past promises and their own ridings.Written by AI from the debate. Updated .

Official text (opens in a new tab)

2 statements

Elizabeth May, Saanich—Gulf Islands

Green
“The Liberals support these pipeline projects without asking if they make financial sense. We already wasted $34 billion on a pipeline that does not make enough money to pay the interest on its debt. Experts say other countries do not even want our bitumen, so we should not spend public money on another one.”
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, here is the thing. All the statements being made by Liberal members about these projects’ being so wonderful are premised on the idea that we do not ask questions such as how a particular project diversifies markets. So far, we have wasted $34 billion. The previous government, under Justin Trudeau and former finance minister Bill Morneau, spent $34 billion to build a pipeline, which still has massive objections, across the landscape, but it still has not made enough money in any given year to pay the interest on the debt Canadians took on to build it. Now, as we are proposing a second one, also built with public money, experts in financial markets are saying there really is not a market for bitumen in other countries, though we are presuming there is one when we do not have any evidence for it.

Elizabeth May, Saanich—Gulf Islands

Green
“I disagree with the member. Cutting greenhouse gases is based on science, not ideology. Every party in this House needs to listen to scientists and take action on climate change before it is too late.”
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, the hon. member for York—South Simcoe and I are not going to agree. I will let him know that right away. The issue for me is that the Liberals are following the Conservative platform and playbook on climate. While the hon. member dismisses what the Liberals have done as purely ideological, I want to put on the record that as far as the Green Party is concerned, when one takes action to reduce greenhouse gases to stabilize what is happening and avoid tipping points in the atmosphere, it is based on science and evidence. Every party in this House should be willing to agree to sit around a table, listen to the scientists and take the steps that are necessary before we lose human civilization and the options for our grandchildren.

Discussion

No comments yet

See the full discussion

Comment rules

More from sitting 146

  1. Government Orders Business of Supply 110 statements
  2. Oral Questions International Trade 13 statements
  3. Oral Questions The Environment 6 statements
  4. Oral Questions Taxation 16 statements
  5. Oral Questions Pensions 4 statements
  6. Oral Questions Taxation 10 statements
  7. Oral Questions National Defence 2 statements
  8. Oral Questions Canada Revenue Agency 4 statements
  9. Oral Questions Small Business 4 statements
  10. Oral Questions The Economy 4 statements
  11. Oral Questions Public Services and Procurement 6 statements
  12. Oral Questions Health 7 statements
  13. Oral Questions Natural Resources 2 statements
  14. Oral Questions Agriculture and Agri-Food 2 statements
  15. Oral Questions Indigenous Affairs 2 statements
  16. Oral Questions Democratic Institutions 5 statements
  17. Government Orders Business of Supply 42 statements
  18. Oral Questions Women and Gender Equality 3 statements
  19. Private Members' Business Youth Criminal Justice Act 11 statements
  20. Government Orders Business of Supply 22 statements
  21. Government Orders Building Canada Strong Act 7 statements
  22. Government Orders Building Canada Strong Act 166 statements
  23. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  24. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements