Business of Supply

The House debated a Conservative supply motion on fuel affordability, which calls for cutting fuel taxes, including on diesel, speeding up approvals for fuel projects, and increasing Canadian fuel production. Conservatives argued high fuel taxes raise costs for farmers, truckers and rural drivers, driving up food prices and food bank use, and pointed to diesel prices higher than in the U.S. and global averages. Liberals defended the government’s affordability measures, including a bill to extend the fuel excise tax suspension until January 2027 and then cut rates in half for two months, along with income tax cuts, the school food program, grocery benefits, and the removal of the consumer carbon price, and cautioned against comparing fuel prices across countries. The NDP member called for an excess profits tax on oil companies, pointing to record industry profits. Members also exchanged points on party records on the carbon tax, foreign investment leaving or entering Canada, and which side had voted against affordability programs.Written by AI from the debate. Updated .

Official text (opens in a new tab)

9 statements

Juanita Nathan, Pickering—Brooklin

Liberal
“High prices and gas costs are coming from foreign conflicts and American tariffs. Our government is helping families by lowering income taxes, paying for school lunches, and giving people grocery benefits. We also want to pass this bill to keep the federal tax on fuel paused until early 2027, and then cut it in half for two months.”
  • A repeated line

    “We introduced the Canada groceries and essentials benefit.”

    Said 29 times by 19 members since April 23.

    Every time it was said
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, it is an honour to rise and speak about this subject today, which is of crucial importance to all Canadians. We are all aware that recent changes on the global stage have made life more unpredictable, more complex and, for too many people, more costly. Our largest trading partner has imposed tariffs on our imports, significantly impacting Canadian workers and businesses from coast to coast to coast. Conservatives may not want to call these tariffs what they are, but on this side of the House, we understand the impacts they are having on Canadian families, businesses, exports and workers. Conflict and instability in the Middle East have led to an increase in fuel prices around the globe. Conservatives may want to blame Canada and Canadians for the challenges we face, but on this side of the House, we are positioning Canada to thrive within a rapidly changing world. Facing these circumstances, Canadians do not need slogans, and they do not need social media influences. They need relief, and relief is what our government has delivered. Through carefully considered measures, we are strengthening our country’s sovereignty and economic resilience while supporting Canadians through these challenges. Since day one in March 2025, we have worked to save Canadians hard-earned money. On July 1 of last year, 22 million Canadians, more than half the country, had their income taxes lowered when we cut the first income tax bracket from 15% to 14%. This represents an annual tax savings of $420 for individuals or up to $840 for two-income families. To help support Canada’s most vulnerable people, we introduced automatic federal benefits filings, starting with the 2026 tax year. This change will automatically give up to 5.5 million low-income Canadians the benefits they qualify for by the 2028 tax year. We also removed the goods and services tax on new homes costing up to $1 million for first-time homebuyers, and we lowered it on new homes priced between $1 million and $1.5 million. This move gives more Canadians, especially young families, the chance to live the Canadian dream of owning a home. Speaking of young families, they know the importance of good food during school days. We made permanent the national school food program, a program derided by Conservatives as “garbage”, to provide meals for up to 400,000 children across Canada. This program saves participating families with two school-age children approximately $800 annually on groceries. Food is essential, but it has grown more costly. To help more than 12 million Canadians manage their grocery budget, we introduced the new Canada groceries and essentials benefit, which provides a family of four with up to $1,890 this year and about $1,400 annually for the next four years. Single Canadians will have a benefit of up to $950 this year and about $700 for the next four years. Food is fuel for learning minds and working bodies, but groceries do not make their way into stores on their own. Canada is a vast nation, and moving people and products is a necessity that requires fuel of a different kind. We know that consumers are facing higher gas and diesel prices at the pump, and businesses have their profitability impacted by the increased cost of getting goods to market. I know that in my riding of Pickering—Brooklin, this is true. Although the factors that led to these high fuel prices are not within Canada’s control, Canadians expect a strong response. We are focused on what we can control. That is why we introduced Bill C-38, the Canadian fuel affordability act, which is currently being studied. Bill C-39 is being debated in the House and will be debated later on today as well. Bill C-38 would build on the temporary suspension of the federal fuel excise tax that we introduced earlier this year, bringing the tax on gasoline, aviation gasoline, diesel and aviation fuel to zero cents per litre. For Canadians filling up their cars, it means a tax cut of 10¢ per litre on gasoline, a savings of about five dollars on a typical 50-litre fill-up, and four cents per litre on diesel fuel. While this cut was originally set to expire last month, Bill C-38, if passed, would extend that suspension of the federal fuel excise tax until January 31, 2027, after the holiday season. Regular rates would then be reduced by 50% through March 31, 2027, inclusive. Higher energy prices are a concern not just here at home but in every part of the planet. We are fortunate to be rich in many natural resources and to be the fourth-largest exporter of crude oil in the world. This is why the Prime Minister has said, “Canada has what the world wants.” This summer, the executive director of the International Energy Agency said that Canada has a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to become a global energy exporting superpower. The leaders of our G7 peer nations are asking us to step up and supply the world with the sustainable, reliable energy they need to power their economies. This is an opportunity we are leaning into and seizing with intention. That is why we recently announced that Pacific link, an oil pipeline that will bring Albertan oil to ports in British Columbia, will be listed as a project of national interest under the Building Canada Act. Designating the Pacific link pipeline as a project of national interest means it will get built faster, reducing Canada’s dependency on U.S. markets as buyers for our oil by giving us a new ability to export to Asian customers. Once completed, the Pacific link will allow us to ship an additional one million barrels of oil each day across the Pacific. While we are prioritizing measures to help Canadians during this difficult time and working to create the right climate to grow the economy and foster investment, we have never wavered in our focus on fiscal responsibility. The International Monetary Fund forecasts that our country will be the second-fastest growing economy in the G7 groups of nations this year and in 2027. Canada’s sovereign debt continues to command the highest rating, a AAA credit rating, from Fitch, from Standard & Poor’s and from Moody’s, the three main debt rating agencies. As we know, this exemplary credit rating allows Canada to issue debt to investors on the best possible terms. As well, as noted in April’s spring economic update, Canada is on track to reduce its deficit in 2025-26 by $11 billion more than originally forecasted in the last federal budget. This gives us an advantage when it comes to investing in the supports and services that matter to Canadians. Canadians are strong and resourceful, and in times of adversity, they expect a strong, resourceful response from their government. The measures I have mentioned are just some of the actions we have taken to protect and promote Canadian interests while positioning the country for future growth and prosperity.

Juanita Nathan, Pickering—Brooklin

Liberal
“We should not compare Canada's diesel prices to global averages. Many other countries control fuel prices or help pay for them, so it is not a fair comparison.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Relevance 100 of 100

    Of this reply, 100% addressed the question or point raised.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, the reason we are speaking about this over and over is that we hear questions about diesel over and over during QP. I wanted to caution my colleague across the aisle that international comparisons on average diesel prices should be interpreted with caution. Diesel prices in many countries are influenced by government subsidies, administrative pricing regimes or other forms of state interventions. As a result, global averages that combine both market-based and non-market prices are not a like-for-like benchmark for assessing Canadian diesel prices. A more meaningful comparison—

Juanita Nathan, Pickering—Brooklin

Liberal
“Our government is lowering costs by extending fuel tax relief and investing money so Canadians can benefit from the returns. I do not have an answer to the member's question right now.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Relevance 46 of 100

    None of this reply addressed the specific point raised or the topic under debate.

    See full analysis
  • A repeated line

    “As Canada continues to build a stronger.”

    Said 3 times by 3 members since September 22.

    Every time it was said
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, as Canada continues to build a stronger, more resilient and more independent economy, the government is taking practical steps to reduce costs today while investing in long-term prosperity. We are extending the fuel tax relief on one of the measures, helping families, workers and businesses navigate the global economic uncertainty. The sovereign fund we have created will be invested where people can benefit from the interest on it and make money. With respect to the question my colleague is asking, I have no answer at this point.

Kevin Lamoureux, Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons

Liberal
“The Conservatives should look at other major countries before they criticize us. Our government is helping Canadians with living costs in many ways, and fuel tax relief is just one part of that plan.”
  • Question or comment in debate

    Signal 29 of 100

    Much of this statement went to praise, blame, greetings, routine procedure or general stories rather than reasons, requests or specific points.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, with respect to the Conservative member’s question, I wish they would take a look at Germany and the United Kingdom. They could take a look at the G7 countries and then maybe come back and pose a question. The member for Pickering—Brooklin has often advocated for affordability. I know she has a lot more that she would like to share with the House on the issue of affordability. It is a holistic approach that the Government of Canada is taking to try to support Canadians. The gas levy tax is one of the measures.

Juanita Nathan, Pickering—Brooklin

Liberal
“Our government is making life more affordable for Canadians right now. We cancelled the consumer carbon tax to help people save money on gas. We cut personal income taxes for 22 million people. We also removed the GST on new homes up to $1 million for first-time buyers.”
  • A repeated line

    “Since July 1, Canadians have been paying less tax, after the government lowered the first marginal personal income tax rate from 15% to 14%.”

    Said 7 times by 7 members since April 23.

    Every time it was said
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, as I said before, as our government makes these large-scale structural transformations to create a stronger, more resilient Canadian economy, we are also taking more immediate actions to make life more affordable for Canadians. There are a few measures that we have taken since this new government formed in 2025. One of them is cancelling the federal consumer carbon tax, which was effective on April 1 and has directly helped Canadians save money at the pump. We have cut taxes for 22 million people, as I have already mentioned, by lowering the first marginal personal income tax rate from 15% to 14%. We have eliminated the goods and services tax for first-time homebuyers on new homes up to $1 million. We have reduced the—

Kevin Lamoureux, Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons

Liberal
“The Conservatives keep changing their minds about the carbon tax. Our Prime Minister got rid of it, and I am glad he did. Manitoba cut gas taxes, and it was a good idea. Our government is happy to use good ideas from any party if they help Canadians.”
  • Question or comment in debate

    Signal 43 of 100

    Much of this statement went to praise, blame, greetings, routine procedure or general stories rather than reasons, requests or specific points.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, those were interesting comments, that is for sure. There was a time when the Conservatives were in favour of a carbon tax, and then they were against the carbon tax. Then Erin O’Toole put the Conservatives back in favour of the carbon tax. Their most recent leader is the one who has said the Conservatives are against the carbon tax. Canada elected a brand new Prime Minister, and what was his first action? It was to get rid of the carbon tax. I, for one, am glad the Prime Minister got rid of the carbon tax. We can take a look at the Conservative idea farm, if we want to call it that. Wab Kinew, Premier of Manitoba, gave Manitobans a break on the excise tax on gasoline. Did the NDP in Manitoba steal the Conservative idea? Maybe if there are good ideas out there, our Prime Minister and this government are not shy to look at them and put them in place because they will help Canadians. Is that not what all this should be about?

Kevin Lamoureux, Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons

Liberal
“Children cannot learn when they are hungry, and this has been a problem for decades. The Conservatives should admit they are wrong and support the school food program.”
  • Question or comment in debate

    Signal 41 of 100

    Much of this statement went to praise, blame, greetings, routine procedure or general stories rather than reasons, requests or specific points.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, in another aspect of the member’s speech, he downplayed the importance of the national school food program. I was first elected in 1988 when Sharon Carstairs was the leader of the Liberal Party in Manitoba. She advocated that a child cannot learn on an empty stomach. For generations, there have been many children in society who have not been able to learn on a full stomach or who have not had food in their tummy during the school day. The need is very real. It is there. It has been there for decades. However, the Conservatives are saying that they do not care about that aspect of education, that those children do not deserve to have food in their tummy when it comes to education. To try to give the false impression that this issue has only been generated in the last 10 or 15 years is just wrong. Will the member admit he is wrong and maybe reverse the Conservative policy?

Serge Cormier, Acadie—Bathurst

Liberal
“The member says he wants to help people in New Brunswick, but he voted against programs that give them food, money for their children, and help for local fishers. He voted against every program that helps his community.”
  • A repeated line

    “Conservatives voted against the Canada child benefit.”

    Said 3 times by 3 members since June 16.

    Every time it was said
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, when I was listening to my colleague from New Brunswick, he said that he wants to help his constituents and wants to help New Brunswickers, but he also said that families are experiencing food insecurity. He voted against the school food program. He voted against the groceries and essentials benefit. He voted against the Canada child benefit. Imagine saying that families are experiencing some difficulty and then voting against all those programs. Every time it was time to help New Brunswickers and his constituents, he voted against. He talks about the crab fishermen and lobster fishermen in my riding. He voted against the Atlantic fisheries fund, the top-up for small craft harbours and the $1 billion that we just announced. He voted against everything. What is he going to vote against the next time?

Braedon Clark, Sackville—Bedford—Preston

Liberal
“Canada had the highest foreign investment this year in almost 20 years, and we just got nearly half a trillion dollars more in investments. I want the member to explain how that fits with his claims about money leaving the country.”
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, the member talked about capital outflow between 2015 and 2024, but I think he stopped a bit early. I wonder if he would respond to the fact that this year we have had the highest level of foreign direct investment in close to 20 years and just last month at the investment summit, Canada received almost half a trillion dollars in investments. I wonder how he would respond to that.

Discussion

No comments yet

See the full discussion

Comment rules

More from sitting 146

  1. Government Orders Business of Supply 110 statements
  2. Oral Questions International Trade 13 statements
  3. Oral Questions The Environment 6 statements
  4. Oral Questions Taxation 16 statements
  5. Oral Questions Pensions 4 statements
  6. Oral Questions Taxation 10 statements
  7. Oral Questions National Defence 2 statements
  8. Oral Questions Canada Revenue Agency 4 statements
  9. Oral Questions Small Business 4 statements
  10. Oral Questions The Economy 4 statements
  11. Oral Questions Public Services and Procurement 6 statements
  12. Oral Questions Health 7 statements
  13. Oral Questions Natural Resources 2 statements
  14. Oral Questions Agriculture and Agri-Food 2 statements
  15. Oral Questions Indigenous Affairs 2 statements
  16. Oral Questions Democratic Institutions 5 statements
  17. Government Orders Business of Supply 42 statements
  18. Oral Questions Women and Gender Equality 3 statements
  19. Private Members' Business Youth Criminal Justice Act 11 statements
  20. Government Orders Business of Supply 22 statements
  21. Government Orders Building Canada Strong Act 7 statements
  22. Government Orders Building Canada Strong Act 166 statements
  23. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  24. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements